Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors

Isaac Moradi, Brian J Soden, Ralph Ferraro, Phillip Arkin, Holger Vömel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors in upper, middle, and lower troposphere for the period 2000-2011 were investigated using satellite observations from three microwave water vapor channels operating at 183.31±1, 183.31±3, and 183.31±7 GHz. The radiosonde data were partitioned based on sensor type into 19 classes. The satellite brightness temperatures (Tb) were simulated using radiosonde profiles and a radiative transfer model, then the radiosonde simulated Tb's were compared with the observed Tb's from the satellites. The surface affected Tb's were excluded from the comparison due to the lack of reliable surface emissivity data at the microwave frequencies. Daytime and nighttime data were examined separately to see the possible effect of daytime radiation bias on the sonde data. The error characteristics among different radiosondes vary significantly, which largely reflects the differences in sensor type. These differences are more evident in the mid-upper troposphere than in the lower troposphere, mainly because some of the sensors stop responding to tropospheric humidity somewhere in the upper or even in the middle troposphere. In the upper troposphere, most sensors have a dry bias but Russian sensors and a few other sensors including GZZ2, VZB2, and RS80H have a wet bias. In middle troposphere, Russian sensors still have a wet bias but all other sensors have a dry bias. All sensors, including Russian sensors, have a dry bias in lower troposphere. The systematic and random errors generally decrease from upper to lower troposphere. Sensors from China, India, Russia, and the U.S. have a large random error in upper troposphere, which indicates that these sensors are not suitable for upper tropospheric studies as they fail to respond to humidity changes in the upper and even middle troposphere. Overall, Vaisala sensors perform better than other sensors throughout the troposphere exhibiting the smallest systematic and random errors. Because of the large differences between different radiosonde humidity sensors, it is important for long-term trend studies to only use data measured using a single type of sensor at any given station. If multiple sensor types are used then it is necessary to consider the bias between sensor types and its possible dependence on humidity and temperature. Key Points Investigating the quality of operational radiosonde humidity profiles Most humidity sensors fail to measure mid-upper tropospheric humidity Ddifferent radiosonde sensors introduce temporal and spatial inhomogeneity

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8040-8053
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans
Volume118
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 27 2013

Fingerprint

humidity measurement
Radiosondes
radiosondes
radiosonde
Atmospheric humidity
humidity
Troposphere
sensor
sensors
Sensors
troposphere
Random errors
random errors
Humidity sensors
Systematic errors
Satellites
daytime
systematic errors
satellite temperature

Keywords

  • microwave remote sensing
  • radiative transfer
  • radiosonde data
  • satellite data
  • tropospheric humidity
  • water vapor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors. / Moradi, Isaac; Soden, Brian J; Ferraro, Ralph; Arkin, Phillip; Vömel, Holger.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, Vol. 118, No. 14, 27.07.2013, p. 8040-8053.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moradi, Isaac ; Soden, Brian J ; Ferraro, Ralph ; Arkin, Phillip ; Vömel, Holger. / Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors. In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans. 2013 ; Vol. 118, No. 14. pp. 8040-8053.
@article{04dac9744c19423a920cd3c6c2272f93,
title = "Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors",
abstract = "The quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors in upper, middle, and lower troposphere for the period 2000-2011 were investigated using satellite observations from three microwave water vapor channels operating at 183.31±1, 183.31±3, and 183.31±7 GHz. The radiosonde data were partitioned based on sensor type into 19 classes. The satellite brightness temperatures (Tb) were simulated using radiosonde profiles and a radiative transfer model, then the radiosonde simulated Tb's were compared with the observed Tb's from the satellites. The surface affected Tb's were excluded from the comparison due to the lack of reliable surface emissivity data at the microwave frequencies. Daytime and nighttime data were examined separately to see the possible effect of daytime radiation bias on the sonde data. The error characteristics among different radiosondes vary significantly, which largely reflects the differences in sensor type. These differences are more evident in the mid-upper troposphere than in the lower troposphere, mainly because some of the sensors stop responding to tropospheric humidity somewhere in the upper or even in the middle troposphere. In the upper troposphere, most sensors have a dry bias but Russian sensors and a few other sensors including GZZ2, VZB2, and RS80H have a wet bias. In middle troposphere, Russian sensors still have a wet bias but all other sensors have a dry bias. All sensors, including Russian sensors, have a dry bias in lower troposphere. The systematic and random errors generally decrease from upper to lower troposphere. Sensors from China, India, Russia, and the U.S. have a large random error in upper troposphere, which indicates that these sensors are not suitable for upper tropospheric studies as they fail to respond to humidity changes in the upper and even middle troposphere. Overall, Vaisala sensors perform better than other sensors throughout the troposphere exhibiting the smallest systematic and random errors. Because of the large differences between different radiosonde humidity sensors, it is important for long-term trend studies to only use data measured using a single type of sensor at any given station. If multiple sensor types are used then it is necessary to consider the bias between sensor types and its possible dependence on humidity and temperature. Key Points Investigating the quality of operational radiosonde humidity profiles Most humidity sensors fail to measure mid-upper tropospheric humidity Ddifferent radiosonde sensors introduce temporal and spatial inhomogeneity",
keywords = "microwave remote sensing, radiative transfer, radiosonde data, satellite data, tropospheric humidity, water vapor",
author = "Isaac Moradi and Soden, {Brian J} and Ralph Ferraro and Phillip Arkin and Holger V{\"o}mel",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1002/jgrd.50589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "8040--8053",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors

AU - Moradi, Isaac

AU - Soden, Brian J

AU - Ferraro, Ralph

AU - Arkin, Phillip

AU - Vömel, Holger

PY - 2013/7/27

Y1 - 2013/7/27

N2 - The quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors in upper, middle, and lower troposphere for the period 2000-2011 were investigated using satellite observations from three microwave water vapor channels operating at 183.31±1, 183.31±3, and 183.31±7 GHz. The radiosonde data were partitioned based on sensor type into 19 classes. The satellite brightness temperatures (Tb) were simulated using radiosonde profiles and a radiative transfer model, then the radiosonde simulated Tb's were compared with the observed Tb's from the satellites. The surface affected Tb's were excluded from the comparison due to the lack of reliable surface emissivity data at the microwave frequencies. Daytime and nighttime data were examined separately to see the possible effect of daytime radiation bias on the sonde data. The error characteristics among different radiosondes vary significantly, which largely reflects the differences in sensor type. These differences are more evident in the mid-upper troposphere than in the lower troposphere, mainly because some of the sensors stop responding to tropospheric humidity somewhere in the upper or even in the middle troposphere. In the upper troposphere, most sensors have a dry bias but Russian sensors and a few other sensors including GZZ2, VZB2, and RS80H have a wet bias. In middle troposphere, Russian sensors still have a wet bias but all other sensors have a dry bias. All sensors, including Russian sensors, have a dry bias in lower troposphere. The systematic and random errors generally decrease from upper to lower troposphere. Sensors from China, India, Russia, and the U.S. have a large random error in upper troposphere, which indicates that these sensors are not suitable for upper tropospheric studies as they fail to respond to humidity changes in the upper and even middle troposphere. Overall, Vaisala sensors perform better than other sensors throughout the troposphere exhibiting the smallest systematic and random errors. Because of the large differences between different radiosonde humidity sensors, it is important for long-term trend studies to only use data measured using a single type of sensor at any given station. If multiple sensor types are used then it is necessary to consider the bias between sensor types and its possible dependence on humidity and temperature. Key Points Investigating the quality of operational radiosonde humidity profiles Most humidity sensors fail to measure mid-upper tropospheric humidity Ddifferent radiosonde sensors introduce temporal and spatial inhomogeneity

AB - The quality of humidity measurements from global operational radiosonde sensors in upper, middle, and lower troposphere for the period 2000-2011 were investigated using satellite observations from three microwave water vapor channels operating at 183.31±1, 183.31±3, and 183.31±7 GHz. The radiosonde data were partitioned based on sensor type into 19 classes. The satellite brightness temperatures (Tb) were simulated using radiosonde profiles and a radiative transfer model, then the radiosonde simulated Tb's were compared with the observed Tb's from the satellites. The surface affected Tb's were excluded from the comparison due to the lack of reliable surface emissivity data at the microwave frequencies. Daytime and nighttime data were examined separately to see the possible effect of daytime radiation bias on the sonde data. The error characteristics among different radiosondes vary significantly, which largely reflects the differences in sensor type. These differences are more evident in the mid-upper troposphere than in the lower troposphere, mainly because some of the sensors stop responding to tropospheric humidity somewhere in the upper or even in the middle troposphere. In the upper troposphere, most sensors have a dry bias but Russian sensors and a few other sensors including GZZ2, VZB2, and RS80H have a wet bias. In middle troposphere, Russian sensors still have a wet bias but all other sensors have a dry bias. All sensors, including Russian sensors, have a dry bias in lower troposphere. The systematic and random errors generally decrease from upper to lower troposphere. Sensors from China, India, Russia, and the U.S. have a large random error in upper troposphere, which indicates that these sensors are not suitable for upper tropospheric studies as they fail to respond to humidity changes in the upper and even middle troposphere. Overall, Vaisala sensors perform better than other sensors throughout the troposphere exhibiting the smallest systematic and random errors. Because of the large differences between different radiosonde humidity sensors, it is important for long-term trend studies to only use data measured using a single type of sensor at any given station. If multiple sensor types are used then it is necessary to consider the bias between sensor types and its possible dependence on humidity and temperature. Key Points Investigating the quality of operational radiosonde humidity profiles Most humidity sensors fail to measure mid-upper tropospheric humidity Ddifferent radiosonde sensors introduce temporal and spatial inhomogeneity

KW - microwave remote sensing

KW - radiative transfer

KW - radiosonde data

KW - satellite data

KW - tropospheric humidity

KW - water vapor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882780153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882780153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jgrd.50589

DO - 10.1002/jgrd.50589

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84882780153

VL - 118

SP - 8040

EP - 8053

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

IS - 14

ER -