Assessing the discordance rate between local and central HER2 testing in women with locally determined HER2-negative breast cancer

Peter A. Kaufman, Kenneth J. Bloom, Howard Burris, Julie R. Gralow, Musa Mayer, Mark Pegram, Hope S. Rugo, Sandra M. Swain, Denise A. Yardley, Miu Chau, Deepa Lalla, Bongin Yoo, Melissa G. Brammer, Charles L. Vogel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND The importance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast cancer is well established. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to determine optimal treatment options. METHODS Breast cancer tumor tissue samples from the VIRGO observational cohort tissue substudy that were locally HER2-negative were retested centrally with both US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays, using FDA-approved assay cutoffs; results were compared. RESULTS Of the 552 unique patient samples centrally retested with local HER2-negative results recorded, tumor samples from 22 (4.0%) patients were determined to be HER2-positive (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.5%-5.7%). Of these, 18 had been tested locally by only one testing methodology; 15 of 18 were HER2-positive after the central retesting, based on the testing methodology not performed locally. Compared with the 530 patients with centrally confirmed HER2-negative tumors, the 22 patients with centrally determined HER2-positive tumors were younger (median age 56.5 versus 60.0 years) and more likely to have ER/PR-negative tumors (27.3% versus 22.3%). These patients also had shorter median progression-free survival (6.4 months [95% CI=3.8-15.9 months] versus 9.1 months [95% CI=8.3-10.3 months]) and overall survival (25.9 months [95% CI=13.8-not estimable] versus 27.9 months [95% CI=25.0-32.9 months]). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the limitations of employing just one HER2 testing methodology in current clinical practice. It identifies a cohort of patients who did not receive potentially efficacious therapy because their tumor HER2-positivity was not determined by the test initially used. Because of inherent limitations in testing methodologies, it is inadvisable to rely on a single test to rule out potential benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. Cancer 2014;120:2657-2664.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2657-2664
Number of pages8
Issue number17
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014


  • breast cancer
  • discordance rate
  • fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
  • immunohistochemistry
  • local and central HER2 testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the discordance rate between local and central HER2 testing in women with locally determined HER2-negative breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this