Assessing the accuracy of the cloud and water vapor fields in the Hurricane WRF (HWRF) model using satellite infrared brightness temperatures

Jason A. Otkin, William E. Lewis, Allen J. Lenzen, Brian D. McNoldy, Sharanya J Majumdar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, cycled forecast experiments were performed to assess the ability of different cloud microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes in the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model to accurately simulate the evolution of the cloud and moisture fields during the entire life cycle of Hurricane Edouard (2014). The forecast accuracy for each model configuration was evaluated through comparison of observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-13 (GOES-13) infrared brightness temperatures and satellite-derived tropical cyclone intensity estimates computed using the advanced Dvorak technique (ADT). Overall, the analysis revealed a large moist bias in the mid- and upper troposphere during the entire forecast period that was at least partially due to a moist bias in the initialization datasets but was also affected by the microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Large differences occurred in the azimuthal brightness temperature distributions, with two of the microphysics schemes producing hurricane eyes that were much larger and clearer than observed, especially for later forecast hours. Comparisons to the forecast 10-m wind speeds showed reasonable agreement (correlations between 0.58 and 0.74) between the surface-based intensities and the ADT intensity estimates inferred via cloud patterns in the upper troposphere. It was also found that model configurations that had the smallest differences between the ADT and surface-based intensities had the most accurate track and intensity forecasts. Last, the cloud microphysics schemes had the largest impact on the forecast accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2027-2046
Number of pages20
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume145
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

brightness temperature
hurricane
water vapor
cloud microphysics
cumulus
troposphere
parameterization
GOES
forecast
tropical cyclone
life cycle
wind velocity
moisture
weather
experiment

Keywords

  • Cloud parameterizations
  • Clouds
  • Hurricanes/typhoons
  • Numerical weather prediction/forecasting
  • Satellite observations
  • Water vapor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Assessing the accuracy of the cloud and water vapor fields in the Hurricane WRF (HWRF) model using satellite infrared brightness temperatures. / Otkin, Jason A.; Lewis, William E.; Lenzen, Allen J.; McNoldy, Brian D.; Majumdar, Sharanya J.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 145, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 2027-2046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Otkin, Jason A. ; Lewis, William E. ; Lenzen, Allen J. ; McNoldy, Brian D. ; Majumdar, Sharanya J. / Assessing the accuracy of the cloud and water vapor fields in the Hurricane WRF (HWRF) model using satellite infrared brightness temperatures. In: Monthly Weather Review. 2017 ; Vol. 145, No. 5. pp. 2027-2046.
@article{a3e906ded6504468a6011bf7f9abcb0d,
title = "Assessing the accuracy of the cloud and water vapor fields in the Hurricane WRF (HWRF) model using satellite infrared brightness temperatures",
abstract = "In this study, cycled forecast experiments were performed to assess the ability of different cloud microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes in the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model to accurately simulate the evolution of the cloud and moisture fields during the entire life cycle of Hurricane Edouard (2014). The forecast accuracy for each model configuration was evaluated through comparison of observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-13 (GOES-13) infrared brightness temperatures and satellite-derived tropical cyclone intensity estimates computed using the advanced Dvorak technique (ADT). Overall, the analysis revealed a large moist bias in the mid- and upper troposphere during the entire forecast period that was at least partially due to a moist bias in the initialization datasets but was also affected by the microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Large differences occurred in the azimuthal brightness temperature distributions, with two of the microphysics schemes producing hurricane eyes that were much larger and clearer than observed, especially for later forecast hours. Comparisons to the forecast 10-m wind speeds showed reasonable agreement (correlations between 0.58 and 0.74) between the surface-based intensities and the ADT intensity estimates inferred via cloud patterns in the upper troposphere. It was also found that model configurations that had the smallest differences between the ADT and surface-based intensities had the most accurate track and intensity forecasts. Last, the cloud microphysics schemes had the largest impact on the forecast accuracy.",
keywords = "Cloud parameterizations, Clouds, Hurricanes/typhoons, Numerical weather prediction/forecasting, Satellite observations, Water vapor",
author = "Otkin, {Jason A.} and Lewis, {William E.} and Lenzen, {Allen J.} and McNoldy, {Brian D.} and Majumdar, {Sharanya J}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/MWR-D-16-0354.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "2027--2046",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the accuracy of the cloud and water vapor fields in the Hurricane WRF (HWRF) model using satellite infrared brightness temperatures

AU - Otkin, Jason A.

AU - Lewis, William E.

AU - Lenzen, Allen J.

AU - McNoldy, Brian D.

AU - Majumdar, Sharanya J

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - In this study, cycled forecast experiments were performed to assess the ability of different cloud microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes in the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model to accurately simulate the evolution of the cloud and moisture fields during the entire life cycle of Hurricane Edouard (2014). The forecast accuracy for each model configuration was evaluated through comparison of observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-13 (GOES-13) infrared brightness temperatures and satellite-derived tropical cyclone intensity estimates computed using the advanced Dvorak technique (ADT). Overall, the analysis revealed a large moist bias in the mid- and upper troposphere during the entire forecast period that was at least partially due to a moist bias in the initialization datasets but was also affected by the microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Large differences occurred in the azimuthal brightness temperature distributions, with two of the microphysics schemes producing hurricane eyes that were much larger and clearer than observed, especially for later forecast hours. Comparisons to the forecast 10-m wind speeds showed reasonable agreement (correlations between 0.58 and 0.74) between the surface-based intensities and the ADT intensity estimates inferred via cloud patterns in the upper troposphere. It was also found that model configurations that had the smallest differences between the ADT and surface-based intensities had the most accurate track and intensity forecasts. Last, the cloud microphysics schemes had the largest impact on the forecast accuracy.

AB - In this study, cycled forecast experiments were performed to assess the ability of different cloud microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes in the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model to accurately simulate the evolution of the cloud and moisture fields during the entire life cycle of Hurricane Edouard (2014). The forecast accuracy for each model configuration was evaluated through comparison of observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-13 (GOES-13) infrared brightness temperatures and satellite-derived tropical cyclone intensity estimates computed using the advanced Dvorak technique (ADT). Overall, the analysis revealed a large moist bias in the mid- and upper troposphere during the entire forecast period that was at least partially due to a moist bias in the initialization datasets but was also affected by the microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Large differences occurred in the azimuthal brightness temperature distributions, with two of the microphysics schemes producing hurricane eyes that were much larger and clearer than observed, especially for later forecast hours. Comparisons to the forecast 10-m wind speeds showed reasonable agreement (correlations between 0.58 and 0.74) between the surface-based intensities and the ADT intensity estimates inferred via cloud patterns in the upper troposphere. It was also found that model configurations that had the smallest differences between the ADT and surface-based intensities had the most accurate track and intensity forecasts. Last, the cloud microphysics schemes had the largest impact on the forecast accuracy.

KW - Cloud parameterizations

KW - Clouds

KW - Hurricanes/typhoons

KW - Numerical weather prediction/forecasting

KW - Satellite observations

KW - Water vapor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018347477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018347477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0354.1

DO - 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0354.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018347477

VL - 145

SP - 2027

EP - 2046

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 5

ER -