Are student ratings of communication instructors due to “easy” grading practices? An analysis of teacher credibility and student-reported performance levels

Michael Beatty, Christopher J. Zahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research indicates that student ratings of mathematics and science instructors are significantly lower than those of their counterparts in social science and the humanities. Frequently, communication instructors’ ratings are among the highest in their respective colleges. Unfortunately, these high ratings sometimes arouse suspicion among administrators and colleagues regarding whether highly rated courses are sufficiently rigorous. A considerable body of research literature suggests that expected grade is unrelated to students’ ratings of instructors. Furthermore, most studies show positive relations/tips between student generated ratings and indices of course difficulty. The present study examined the relationship between teacher credibility and various student perceptions about the instructor and course within the context of communication courses. Although teacher credibility was positively correlated with students’ (1) overall rating of the level of excellence of the course and instructor and (2) intentions to take more courses from the instructor, recommend the course and instructor to peers, and take more communication courses from other instructors, the correlations between teacher credibility and student-reported levels of course performance were uncorrelated at the end of the semester. Implications regarding the independence of student ratings of teacher credibility and self-reported performance are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-282
Number of pages8
JournalCommunication Education
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

grading
credibility
instructor
rating
Students
communication
Communication
teacher
performance
student
Social sciences
Teacher Credibility
Instructor
Rating
Grading
semester
social science
mathematics
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Education

Cite this

@article{89a6050003554247b3bebe7f7533b552,
title = "Are student ratings of communication instructors due to “easy” grading practices?: An analysis of teacher credibility and student-reported performance levels",
abstract = "Research indicates that student ratings of mathematics and science instructors are significantly lower than those of their counterparts in social science and the humanities. Frequently, communication instructors’ ratings are among the highest in their respective colleges. Unfortunately, these high ratings sometimes arouse suspicion among administrators and colleagues regarding whether highly rated courses are sufficiently rigorous. A considerable body of research literature suggests that expected grade is unrelated to students’ ratings of instructors. Furthermore, most studies show positive relations/tips between student generated ratings and indices of course difficulty. The present study examined the relationship between teacher credibility and various student perceptions about the instructor and course within the context of communication courses. Although teacher credibility was positively correlated with students’ (1) overall rating of the level of excellence of the course and instructor and (2) intentions to take more courses from the instructor, recommend the course and instructor to peers, and take more communication courses from other instructors, the correlations between teacher credibility and student-reported levels of course performance were uncorrelated at the end of the semester. Implications regarding the independence of student ratings of teacher credibility and self-reported performance are discussed.",
author = "Michael Beatty and Zahn, {Christopher J.}",
year = "1990",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03634529009378809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "275--282",
journal = "Communication Education",
issn = "0363-4523",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are student ratings of communication instructors due to “easy” grading practices?

T2 - An analysis of teacher credibility and student-reported performance levels

AU - Beatty, Michael

AU - Zahn, Christopher J.

PY - 1990/10/1

Y1 - 1990/10/1

N2 - Research indicates that student ratings of mathematics and science instructors are significantly lower than those of their counterparts in social science and the humanities. Frequently, communication instructors’ ratings are among the highest in their respective colleges. Unfortunately, these high ratings sometimes arouse suspicion among administrators and colleagues regarding whether highly rated courses are sufficiently rigorous. A considerable body of research literature suggests that expected grade is unrelated to students’ ratings of instructors. Furthermore, most studies show positive relations/tips between student generated ratings and indices of course difficulty. The present study examined the relationship between teacher credibility and various student perceptions about the instructor and course within the context of communication courses. Although teacher credibility was positively correlated with students’ (1) overall rating of the level of excellence of the course and instructor and (2) intentions to take more courses from the instructor, recommend the course and instructor to peers, and take more communication courses from other instructors, the correlations between teacher credibility and student-reported levels of course performance were uncorrelated at the end of the semester. Implications regarding the independence of student ratings of teacher credibility and self-reported performance are discussed.

AB - Research indicates that student ratings of mathematics and science instructors are significantly lower than those of their counterparts in social science and the humanities. Frequently, communication instructors’ ratings are among the highest in their respective colleges. Unfortunately, these high ratings sometimes arouse suspicion among administrators and colleagues regarding whether highly rated courses are sufficiently rigorous. A considerable body of research literature suggests that expected grade is unrelated to students’ ratings of instructors. Furthermore, most studies show positive relations/tips between student generated ratings and indices of course difficulty. The present study examined the relationship between teacher credibility and various student perceptions about the instructor and course within the context of communication courses. Although teacher credibility was positively correlated with students’ (1) overall rating of the level of excellence of the course and instructor and (2) intentions to take more courses from the instructor, recommend the course and instructor to peers, and take more communication courses from other instructors, the correlations between teacher credibility and student-reported levels of course performance were uncorrelated at the end of the semester. Implications regarding the independence of student ratings of teacher credibility and self-reported performance are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954690923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954690923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03634529009378809

DO - 10.1080/03634529009378809

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84954690923

VL - 39

SP - 275

EP - 282

JO - Communication Education

JF - Communication Education

SN - 0363-4523

IS - 4

ER -