Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is challenging to research ethics committees (RECs). We reviewed the REC preparedness when reviewing CBPR projects. We searched the MEDLINE database and included qualitative studies of CBPR researchers or REC members about their experiences with RECs. The search yielded 107 studies, of which 10 met our criteria. Barriers were that the community is not prepared to conduct research, the reluctance of RECs to work outside the university, the difficulty RECs have understanding CBPR, and that REC forms evaluate individual rather than community risk. Facilitators were having a CBPR expert as an REC member and educating RECs. Therefore, RECs are not prepared to evaluate CBPR projects leading to unnecessary delays in the approval process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-495
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Community-Based Participatory Research
research ethics
Research Ethics Committees
community
Committee Membership
research project
MEDLINE
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • community consent
  • community involvement
  • community risk
  • community-based participatory research
  • IRB/REC forms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research? / Tamariz, Leonardo; Medina, Heidy; Taylor, Janielle; Carrasquillo, Olveen; Kobetz, Erin; Palacio, Ana M.

In: Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.12.2015, p. 488-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{01b5e8e3a0c148b69a9a18a1a3ea64b7,
title = "Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?",
abstract = "Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is challenging to research ethics committees (RECs). We reviewed the REC preparedness when reviewing CBPR projects. We searched the MEDLINE database and included qualitative studies of CBPR researchers or REC members about their experiences with RECs. The search yielded 107 studies, of which 10 met our criteria. Barriers were that the community is not prepared to conduct research, the reluctance of RECs to work outside the university, the difficulty RECs have understanding CBPR, and that REC forms evaluate individual rather than community risk. Facilitators were having a CBPR expert as an REC member and educating RECs. Therefore, RECs are not prepared to evaluate CBPR projects leading to unnecessary delays in the approval process.",
keywords = "community consent, community involvement, community risk, community-based participatory research, IRB/REC forms",
author = "Leonardo Tamariz and Heidy Medina and Janielle Taylor and Olveen Carrasquillo and Erin Kobetz and Palacio, {Ana M}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1556264615615008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "488--495",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics",
issn = "1556-2646",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?

AU - Tamariz, Leonardo

AU - Medina, Heidy

AU - Taylor, Janielle

AU - Carrasquillo, Olveen

AU - Kobetz, Erin

AU - Palacio, Ana M

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is challenging to research ethics committees (RECs). We reviewed the REC preparedness when reviewing CBPR projects. We searched the MEDLINE database and included qualitative studies of CBPR researchers or REC members about their experiences with RECs. The search yielded 107 studies, of which 10 met our criteria. Barriers were that the community is not prepared to conduct research, the reluctance of RECs to work outside the university, the difficulty RECs have understanding CBPR, and that REC forms evaluate individual rather than community risk. Facilitators were having a CBPR expert as an REC member and educating RECs. Therefore, RECs are not prepared to evaluate CBPR projects leading to unnecessary delays in the approval process.

AB - Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is challenging to research ethics committees (RECs). We reviewed the REC preparedness when reviewing CBPR projects. We searched the MEDLINE database and included qualitative studies of CBPR researchers or REC members about their experiences with RECs. The search yielded 107 studies, of which 10 met our criteria. Barriers were that the community is not prepared to conduct research, the reluctance of RECs to work outside the university, the difficulty RECs have understanding CBPR, and that REC forms evaluate individual rather than community risk. Facilitators were having a CBPR expert as an REC member and educating RECs. Therefore, RECs are not prepared to evaluate CBPR projects leading to unnecessary delays in the approval process.

KW - community consent

KW - community involvement

KW - community risk

KW - community-based participatory research

KW - IRB/REC forms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983471965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983471965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1556264615615008

DO - 10.1177/1556264615615008

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26527370

AN - SCOPUS:84983471965

VL - 10

SP - 488

EP - 495

JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

SN - 1556-2646

IS - 5

ER -