Are 'passive' extension exercises really passive?

Ira Fiebert, C. D. Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When rehabilitating patients with back dysfunction, extension exercises that are presumably 'passive' for the erector spinae muscles are frequently used. The purpose of this study was to record electromyographic (EMG) activity from back extensor muscles to determine if these muscles are truly inactive during these maneuvers. Surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from lower lumbar muscles in 62 pain-free subjects. The root-mean-square EMG activity, recorded in μV for the four positions tested was (X̄ ± SD): lying prone (1.268 ± 0.902), extension in lying prone (6.713 ± 6.976), standing neutral (4.760 ± 3.282), and extension in standing (3.558 ± 2.273). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that EMG activity was greatest for extension in lying prone (p < .05), equivalent between the two standing positions (p > .05), and least when lying prone (p < .05). The results of this study demonstrated that 'passive' extension exercises were not truly passive for lumbar back extensor muscles. From a clinical perspective, if the performance of passive back extension is important, extension in lying prone may not be the exercise of choice and having patients lying prone may be the most beneficial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-116
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume19
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Back Muscles
Exercise
Muscles
Analysis of Variance
Pain-Free

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Are 'passive' extension exercises really passive? / Fiebert, Ira; Keller, C. D.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.01.1994, p. 111-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a572765dc4f4b0e9d7887ce2f5bc3de,
title = "Are 'passive' extension exercises really passive?",
abstract = "When rehabilitating patients with back dysfunction, extension exercises that are presumably 'passive' for the erector spinae muscles are frequently used. The purpose of this study was to record electromyographic (EMG) activity from back extensor muscles to determine if these muscles are truly inactive during these maneuvers. Surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from lower lumbar muscles in 62 pain-free subjects. The root-mean-square EMG activity, recorded in μV for the four positions tested was (X̄ ± SD): lying prone (1.268 ± 0.902), extension in lying prone (6.713 ± 6.976), standing neutral (4.760 ± 3.282), and extension in standing (3.558 ± 2.273). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that EMG activity was greatest for extension in lying prone (p < .05), equivalent between the two standing positions (p > .05), and least when lying prone (p < .05). The results of this study demonstrated that 'passive' extension exercises were not truly passive for lumbar back extensor muscles. From a clinical perspective, if the performance of passive back extension is important, extension in lying prone may not be the exercise of choice and having patients lying prone may be the most beneficial.",
author = "Ira Fiebert and Keller, {C. D.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "111--116",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy",
issn = "0190-6011",
publisher = "JOSPT",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are 'passive' extension exercises really passive?

AU - Fiebert, Ira

AU - Keller, C. D.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - When rehabilitating patients with back dysfunction, extension exercises that are presumably 'passive' for the erector spinae muscles are frequently used. The purpose of this study was to record electromyographic (EMG) activity from back extensor muscles to determine if these muscles are truly inactive during these maneuvers. Surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from lower lumbar muscles in 62 pain-free subjects. The root-mean-square EMG activity, recorded in μV for the four positions tested was (X̄ ± SD): lying prone (1.268 ± 0.902), extension in lying prone (6.713 ± 6.976), standing neutral (4.760 ± 3.282), and extension in standing (3.558 ± 2.273). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that EMG activity was greatest for extension in lying prone (p < .05), equivalent between the two standing positions (p > .05), and least when lying prone (p < .05). The results of this study demonstrated that 'passive' extension exercises were not truly passive for lumbar back extensor muscles. From a clinical perspective, if the performance of passive back extension is important, extension in lying prone may not be the exercise of choice and having patients lying prone may be the most beneficial.

AB - When rehabilitating patients with back dysfunction, extension exercises that are presumably 'passive' for the erector spinae muscles are frequently used. The purpose of this study was to record electromyographic (EMG) activity from back extensor muscles to determine if these muscles are truly inactive during these maneuvers. Surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from lower lumbar muscles in 62 pain-free subjects. The root-mean-square EMG activity, recorded in μV for the four positions tested was (X̄ ± SD): lying prone (1.268 ± 0.902), extension in lying prone (6.713 ± 6.976), standing neutral (4.760 ± 3.282), and extension in standing (3.558 ± 2.273). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that EMG activity was greatest for extension in lying prone (p < .05), equivalent between the two standing positions (p > .05), and least when lying prone (p < .05). The results of this study demonstrated that 'passive' extension exercises were not truly passive for lumbar back extensor muscles. From a clinical perspective, if the performance of passive back extension is important, extension in lying prone may not be the exercise of choice and having patients lying prone may be the most beneficial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027954185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027954185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8148864

AN - SCOPUS:0027954185

VL - 19

SP - 111

EP - 116

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

SN - 0190-6011

IS - 2

ER -