Arch versus femoral artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass

T. A. Salerno, D. P. Lince, D. N. White, R. B. Lynn, E. J. Charrette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


Aortic arch perfusion is favored by most cardiac surgeons. Perfusion via the femoral artery is still used sporadically at reoperations, for aneurysms of the ascending aorta, or for the institution of partial pump support in very sick patients prior to opening of the chest. Our over-all experience indicates that surgical complications occurred primarily in the group of patients perfused via the femoral artery. On the other hand, serious disturbance in cerebral perfusion, as determined by electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring, occurred in 7 percent of the patients perfused via the arch and 3 percent of those perfused via the femoral artery, a difference that was not statistically significant. We continue to advocate aortic arch cannulation and EEG monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)681-684
Number of pages4
JournalUnknown Journal
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Arch versus femoral artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this