Aqueductal stroke volume: Comparisons with intracranial pressure scores in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

G. Ringstad, K. E. Emblem, O. Geier, Noam Alperin, P. K. Eide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aqueductal stroke volume from phase-contrast MR imaging has been proposed for predicting shunt response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, this biomarker has remained controversial in use and has a lack of validation with invasive intracranial monitoring. We studied how aqueductal stroke volume compares with intracranial pressure scores in the presurgical work-up and clinical score, ventricular volume, and aqueduct area and assessed the patient's response to shunting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase-contrast MR imaging was performed in 21 patients with probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients were selected for shunting on the basis of pathologically increased intracranial pressure pulsatility. Patients with shunts were offered a second MR imaging after 12 months. Ventricular volume and transverse aqueductal area were calculated, as well as clinical symptom score. RESULTS: No correlations between aqueductal stroke volume and preoperative scores of mean intracranial pressure or mean wave amplitudes were observed. Preoperative aqueductal stroke volume was not different between patients with shunts and conservatively treated patients (P=.69) but was correlated with ventricular volume (R=0.60, P=.004) and aqueductal area (R=0.58, P=.006) but not with the severity or duration of clinical symptoms. After shunting, aqueductal stroke volume (P=.006) and ventricular volume (P=.002) were reduced. A clinical improvement was seen in 16 of 17 patients who had shunts (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueductal stroke volume does not reflect intracranial pressure pulsatility or symptom score, but rather aqueduct area and ventricular volume. The results do not support the use of aqueductal stroke volume for selecting patients for shunting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1623-1630
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume36
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Intracranial Pressure
Stroke Volume
Biomarkers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Aqueductal stroke volume : Comparisons with intracranial pressure scores in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. / Ringstad, G.; Emblem, K. E.; Geier, O.; Alperin, Noam; Eide, P. K.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 36, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 1623-1630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4857fce912cf4a9fb8c91faa76b316fc,
title = "Aqueductal stroke volume: Comparisons with intracranial pressure scores in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aqueductal stroke volume from phase-contrast MR imaging has been proposed for predicting shunt response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, this biomarker has remained controversial in use and has a lack of validation with invasive intracranial monitoring. We studied how aqueductal stroke volume compares with intracranial pressure scores in the presurgical work-up and clinical score, ventricular volume, and aqueduct area and assessed the patient's response to shunting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase-contrast MR imaging was performed in 21 patients with probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients were selected for shunting on the basis of pathologically increased intracranial pressure pulsatility. Patients with shunts were offered a second MR imaging after 12 months. Ventricular volume and transverse aqueductal area were calculated, as well as clinical symptom score. RESULTS: No correlations between aqueductal stroke volume and preoperative scores of mean intracranial pressure or mean wave amplitudes were observed. Preoperative aqueductal stroke volume was not different between patients with shunts and conservatively treated patients (P=.69) but was correlated with ventricular volume (R=0.60, P=.004) and aqueductal area (R=0.58, P=.006) but not with the severity or duration of clinical symptoms. After shunting, aqueductal stroke volume (P=.006) and ventricular volume (P=.002) were reduced. A clinical improvement was seen in 16 of 17 patients who had shunts (94{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueductal stroke volume does not reflect intracranial pressure pulsatility or symptom score, but rather aqueduct area and ventricular volume. The results do not support the use of aqueductal stroke volume for selecting patients for shunting.",
author = "G. Ringstad and Emblem, {K. E.} and O. Geier and Noam Alperin and Eide, {P. K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A4340",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1623--1630",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aqueductal stroke volume

T2 - Comparisons with intracranial pressure scores in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

AU - Ringstad, G.

AU - Emblem, K. E.

AU - Geier, O.

AU - Alperin, Noam

AU - Eide, P. K.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aqueductal stroke volume from phase-contrast MR imaging has been proposed for predicting shunt response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, this biomarker has remained controversial in use and has a lack of validation with invasive intracranial monitoring. We studied how aqueductal stroke volume compares with intracranial pressure scores in the presurgical work-up and clinical score, ventricular volume, and aqueduct area and assessed the patient's response to shunting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase-contrast MR imaging was performed in 21 patients with probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients were selected for shunting on the basis of pathologically increased intracranial pressure pulsatility. Patients with shunts were offered a second MR imaging after 12 months. Ventricular volume and transverse aqueductal area were calculated, as well as clinical symptom score. RESULTS: No correlations between aqueductal stroke volume and preoperative scores of mean intracranial pressure or mean wave amplitudes were observed. Preoperative aqueductal stroke volume was not different between patients with shunts and conservatively treated patients (P=.69) but was correlated with ventricular volume (R=0.60, P=.004) and aqueductal area (R=0.58, P=.006) but not with the severity or duration of clinical symptoms. After shunting, aqueductal stroke volume (P=.006) and ventricular volume (P=.002) were reduced. A clinical improvement was seen in 16 of 17 patients who had shunts (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueductal stroke volume does not reflect intracranial pressure pulsatility or symptom score, but rather aqueduct area and ventricular volume. The results do not support the use of aqueductal stroke volume for selecting patients for shunting.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aqueductal stroke volume from phase-contrast MR imaging has been proposed for predicting shunt response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, this biomarker has remained controversial in use and has a lack of validation with invasive intracranial monitoring. We studied how aqueductal stroke volume compares with intracranial pressure scores in the presurgical work-up and clinical score, ventricular volume, and aqueduct area and assessed the patient's response to shunting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase-contrast MR imaging was performed in 21 patients with probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients were selected for shunting on the basis of pathologically increased intracranial pressure pulsatility. Patients with shunts were offered a second MR imaging after 12 months. Ventricular volume and transverse aqueductal area were calculated, as well as clinical symptom score. RESULTS: No correlations between aqueductal stroke volume and preoperative scores of mean intracranial pressure or mean wave amplitudes were observed. Preoperative aqueductal stroke volume was not different between patients with shunts and conservatively treated patients (P=.69) but was correlated with ventricular volume (R=0.60, P=.004) and aqueductal area (R=0.58, P=.006) but not with the severity or duration of clinical symptoms. After shunting, aqueductal stroke volume (P=.006) and ventricular volume (P=.002) were reduced. A clinical improvement was seen in 16 of 17 patients who had shunts (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueductal stroke volume does not reflect intracranial pressure pulsatility or symptom score, but rather aqueduct area and ventricular volume. The results do not support the use of aqueductal stroke volume for selecting patients for shunting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941359661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941359661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4340

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4340

M3 - Article

C2 - 25977480

AN - SCOPUS:84941359661

VL - 36

SP - 1623

EP - 1630

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 9

ER -