Anterior cruciate ligament injury and access to care in South Florida: Does insurance status play a role?

Michael Baraga, Marvin K. Smith, Jean P. Tanner, Lee Kaplan, Bryson P. Lesniak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Health insurance status and access to care are recurring topics of discussion and concern. The purpose of this investigation was to examine access to care on the basis of insurance status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in South Florida. Methods: From March 2010 to March 2011, eighty patients with ACL injuries were identified at a county hospital sports medicine clinic and a university-based sports medicine practice. Demographic and injury-specific data were obtained with attention to the date of injury, the date of diagnosis, and the number of medical visits. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models to determine the effect of insurance type on the time to diagnosis of an ACL tear. Results: Patients with private insurance were diagnosed at a median fourteen days after the injury, whereas those receiving Medicaid and those without insurance were diagnosed a median of fifty-six and 121 days after the injury, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients without insurance and those receiving Medicaid had more medical visits prior to diagnosis (median, four; range two to six) than those with private insurance (median, three; range, one to five) (p = 0.006). Differences for patient delays due to not seeking care were not significant among the three groups (p = 0.484). Conclusions: When grouped according to insurance status, subjects receiving Medicaid in South Florida faced greater system-related delays in obtaining care than did subjects with private insurance. System-related factors such as lack of access to specialized care result in an increased number of medical encounters. These regional findings are consistent with those of other regional studies on access to orthopaedic care. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume94
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 19 2012

Fingerprint

Insurance Coverage
Insurance
Medicaid
Sports Medicine
Wounds and Injuries
Hospital Medicine
County Hospitals
Health Insurance
Proportional Hazards Models
Health Status
Orthopedics
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Demography
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Anterior cruciate ligament injury and access to care in South Florida : Does insurance status play a role? / Baraga, Michael; Smith, Marvin K.; Tanner, Jean P.; Kaplan, Lee; Lesniak, Bryson P.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 94, No. 24, 19.12.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b22c76748bd4d23a9ba7795ce120ec3,
title = "Anterior cruciate ligament injury and access to care in South Florida: Does insurance status play a role?",
abstract = "Background: Health insurance status and access to care are recurring topics of discussion and concern. The purpose of this investigation was to examine access to care on the basis of insurance status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in South Florida. Methods: From March 2010 to March 2011, eighty patients with ACL injuries were identified at a county hospital sports medicine clinic and a university-based sports medicine practice. Demographic and injury-specific data were obtained with attention to the date of injury, the date of diagnosis, and the number of medical visits. Hazard ratios and 95{\%} confidence intervals were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models to determine the effect of insurance type on the time to diagnosis of an ACL tear. Results: Patients with private insurance were diagnosed at a median fourteen days after the injury, whereas those receiving Medicaid and those without insurance were diagnosed a median of fifty-six and 121 days after the injury, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients without insurance and those receiving Medicaid had more medical visits prior to diagnosis (median, four; range two to six) than those with private insurance (median, three; range, one to five) (p = 0.006). Differences for patient delays due to not seeking care were not significant among the three groups (p = 0.484). Conclusions: When grouped according to insurance status, subjects receiving Medicaid in South Florida faced greater system-related delays in obtaining care than did subjects with private insurance. System-related factors such as lack of access to specialized care result in an increased number of medical encounters. These regional findings are consistent with those of other regional studies on access to orthopaedic care. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "Michael Baraga and Smith, {Marvin K.} and Tanner, {Jean P.} and Lee Kaplan and Lesniak, {Bryson P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "19",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.K.00852",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior cruciate ligament injury and access to care in South Florida

T2 - Does insurance status play a role?

AU - Baraga, Michael

AU - Smith, Marvin K.

AU - Tanner, Jean P.

AU - Kaplan, Lee

AU - Lesniak, Bryson P.

PY - 2012/12/19

Y1 - 2012/12/19

N2 - Background: Health insurance status and access to care are recurring topics of discussion and concern. The purpose of this investigation was to examine access to care on the basis of insurance status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in South Florida. Methods: From March 2010 to March 2011, eighty patients with ACL injuries were identified at a county hospital sports medicine clinic and a university-based sports medicine practice. Demographic and injury-specific data were obtained with attention to the date of injury, the date of diagnosis, and the number of medical visits. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models to determine the effect of insurance type on the time to diagnosis of an ACL tear. Results: Patients with private insurance were diagnosed at a median fourteen days after the injury, whereas those receiving Medicaid and those without insurance were diagnosed a median of fifty-six and 121 days after the injury, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients without insurance and those receiving Medicaid had more medical visits prior to diagnosis (median, four; range two to six) than those with private insurance (median, three; range, one to five) (p = 0.006). Differences for patient delays due to not seeking care were not significant among the three groups (p = 0.484). Conclusions: When grouped according to insurance status, subjects receiving Medicaid in South Florida faced greater system-related delays in obtaining care than did subjects with private insurance. System-related factors such as lack of access to specialized care result in an increased number of medical encounters. These regional findings are consistent with those of other regional studies on access to orthopaedic care. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Background: Health insurance status and access to care are recurring topics of discussion and concern. The purpose of this investigation was to examine access to care on the basis of insurance status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in South Florida. Methods: From March 2010 to March 2011, eighty patients with ACL injuries were identified at a county hospital sports medicine clinic and a university-based sports medicine practice. Demographic and injury-specific data were obtained with attention to the date of injury, the date of diagnosis, and the number of medical visits. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models to determine the effect of insurance type on the time to diagnosis of an ACL tear. Results: Patients with private insurance were diagnosed at a median fourteen days after the injury, whereas those receiving Medicaid and those without insurance were diagnosed a median of fifty-six and 121 days after the injury, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients without insurance and those receiving Medicaid had more medical visits prior to diagnosis (median, four; range two to six) than those with private insurance (median, three; range, one to five) (p = 0.006). Differences for patient delays due to not seeking care were not significant among the three groups (p = 0.484). Conclusions: When grouped according to insurance status, subjects receiving Medicaid in South Florida faced greater system-related delays in obtaining care than did subjects with private insurance. System-related factors such as lack of access to specialized care result in an increased number of medical encounters. These regional findings are consistent with those of other regional studies on access to orthopaedic care. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871522315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871522315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.K.00852

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.K.00852

M3 - Article

C2 - 23318622

AN - SCOPUS:84871522315

VL - 94

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 24

ER -