Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses

Belle Rose Ragins, Teresa Scandura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the "contact hypothesis," which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the "sex role spillover" model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-455
Number of pages27
JournalSex Roles
Volume32
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1995

Fingerprint

Sexual Harassment
sexual harassment
gender
role model
Occupations
occupation
blue-collar occupation
contact
Caucasian
job satisfaction
gender role
Job Satisfaction
discrimination
promotion
workplace
Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment : An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. / Ragins, Belle Rose; Scandura, Teresa.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 32, No. 7-8, 01.04.1995, p. 429-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1965597afa6249d997f5c8f425e86628,
title = "Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses",
abstract = "This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the {"}contact hypothesis,{"} which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the {"}sex role spillover{"} model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.",
author = "Ragins, {Belle Rose} and Teresa Scandura",
year = "1995",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01544181",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "429--455",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment

T2 - An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses

AU - Ragins, Belle Rose

AU - Scandura, Teresa

PY - 1995/4/1

Y1 - 1995/4/1

N2 - This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the "contact hypothesis," which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the "sex role spillover" model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.

AB - This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the "contact hypothesis," which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the "sex role spillover" model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844481211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844481211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01544181

DO - 10.1007/BF01544181

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21844481211

VL - 32

SP - 429

EP - 455

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 7-8

ER -