Angling for endangered fish

Conservation problem or conservation action?

Steven J. Cooke, Zeb S. Hogan, Paul A. Butcher, Michael J W Stokesbury, Rajeev Raghavan, Austin J. Gallagher, Neil Hammerschlag, Andy J. Danylchuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recreational angling has been implicated in population declines of some marine and freshwater fish, but this activity is rarely considered as a threat or even halted when endangered species are targeted. Indeed, in some cases, anglers are drawn to fish for rare or endangered species. Conservation-oriented behaviours such as catch-and-release are often practiced voluntarily due to the ethics of anglers, yet even in these cases, some fishing mortality occurs. Nonetheless, there are many indirect conservation benefits associated with recreational angling. Here, we present a series of case-studies and consider whether catch-and-release angling for endangered fish is a conservation problem or a conservation action. If recreational angling activities contribute to population-level consequences that are contrary to recovery strategies, then angling for endangered species would seem to be a poor option. However, as revealed by several case-studies, there is much evidence that anglers are vocal and effective proponents of fish and habitat conservation, and for endangered species, they are often the only voice when other stakeholders are not engaged. Anglers may contribute directly to conservation actions via user fees (e.g. licences), philanthropic donations or by volunteering in research, education and restoration activities. However, it is important to quantify post-release mortality as well as understand the full suite of factors influencing a given population or species to know the potential risks. A risk assessment approach outlined in the paper may be used by managers to determine when the benefits of angling for endangered species outweigh the risks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFish and Fisheries
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2014

Fingerprint

angling
sport fishing
endangered species
fishermen
fish
volunteerism
user fee
risk assessment process
case studies
educational research
habitat conservation
fishing mortality
ethics
population decline
rare species
freshwater fish
marine fish
stakeholders
managers
stakeholder

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Endangered fish
  • Recreational angling
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science

Cite this

Cooke, S. J., Hogan, Z. S., Butcher, P. A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Raghavan, R., Gallagher, A. J., ... Danylchuk, A. J. (Accepted/In press). Angling for endangered fish: Conservation problem or conservation action? Fish and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12076

Angling for endangered fish : Conservation problem or conservation action? / Cooke, Steven J.; Hogan, Zeb S.; Butcher, Paul A.; Stokesbury, Michael J W; Raghavan, Rajeev; Gallagher, Austin J.; Hammerschlag, Neil; Danylchuk, Andy J.

In: Fish and Fisheries, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooke, SJ, Hogan, ZS, Butcher, PA, Stokesbury, MJW, Raghavan, R, Gallagher, AJ, Hammerschlag, N & Danylchuk, AJ 2014, 'Angling for endangered fish: Conservation problem or conservation action?', Fish and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12076
Cooke SJ, Hogan ZS, Butcher PA, Stokesbury MJW, Raghavan R, Gallagher AJ et al. Angling for endangered fish: Conservation problem or conservation action? Fish and Fisheries. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12076
Cooke, Steven J. ; Hogan, Zeb S. ; Butcher, Paul A. ; Stokesbury, Michael J W ; Raghavan, Rajeev ; Gallagher, Austin J. ; Hammerschlag, Neil ; Danylchuk, Andy J. / Angling for endangered fish : Conservation problem or conservation action?. In: Fish and Fisheries. 2014.
@article{cfa86b460c064632a3c722805782561d,
title = "Angling for endangered fish: Conservation problem or conservation action?",
abstract = "Recreational angling has been implicated in population declines of some marine and freshwater fish, but this activity is rarely considered as a threat or even halted when endangered species are targeted. Indeed, in some cases, anglers are drawn to fish for rare or endangered species. Conservation-oriented behaviours such as catch-and-release are often practiced voluntarily due to the ethics of anglers, yet even in these cases, some fishing mortality occurs. Nonetheless, there are many indirect conservation benefits associated with recreational angling. Here, we present a series of case-studies and consider whether catch-and-release angling for endangered fish is a conservation problem or a conservation action. If recreational angling activities contribute to population-level consequences that are contrary to recovery strategies, then angling for endangered species would seem to be a poor option. However, as revealed by several case-studies, there is much evidence that anglers are vocal and effective proponents of fish and habitat conservation, and for endangered species, they are often the only voice when other stakeholders are not engaged. Anglers may contribute directly to conservation actions via user fees (e.g. licences), philanthropic donations or by volunteering in research, education and restoration activities. However, it is important to quantify post-release mortality as well as understand the full suite of factors influencing a given population or species to know the potential risks. A risk assessment approach outlined in the paper may be used by managers to determine when the benefits of angling for endangered species outweigh the risks.",
keywords = "Conservation, Endangered fish, Recreational angling, Risk assessment",
author = "Cooke, {Steven J.} and Hogan, {Zeb S.} and Butcher, {Paul A.} and Stokesbury, {Michael J W} and Rajeev Raghavan and Gallagher, {Austin J.} and Neil Hammerschlag and Danylchuk, {Andy J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/faf.12076",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Fish and Fisheries",
issn = "1467-2960",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angling for endangered fish

T2 - Conservation problem or conservation action?

AU - Cooke, Steven J.

AU - Hogan, Zeb S.

AU - Butcher, Paul A.

AU - Stokesbury, Michael J W

AU - Raghavan, Rajeev

AU - Gallagher, Austin J.

AU - Hammerschlag, Neil

AU - Danylchuk, Andy J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recreational angling has been implicated in population declines of some marine and freshwater fish, but this activity is rarely considered as a threat or even halted when endangered species are targeted. Indeed, in some cases, anglers are drawn to fish for rare or endangered species. Conservation-oriented behaviours such as catch-and-release are often practiced voluntarily due to the ethics of anglers, yet even in these cases, some fishing mortality occurs. Nonetheless, there are many indirect conservation benefits associated with recreational angling. Here, we present a series of case-studies and consider whether catch-and-release angling for endangered fish is a conservation problem or a conservation action. If recreational angling activities contribute to population-level consequences that are contrary to recovery strategies, then angling for endangered species would seem to be a poor option. However, as revealed by several case-studies, there is much evidence that anglers are vocal and effective proponents of fish and habitat conservation, and for endangered species, they are often the only voice when other stakeholders are not engaged. Anglers may contribute directly to conservation actions via user fees (e.g. licences), philanthropic donations or by volunteering in research, education and restoration activities. However, it is important to quantify post-release mortality as well as understand the full suite of factors influencing a given population or species to know the potential risks. A risk assessment approach outlined in the paper may be used by managers to determine when the benefits of angling for endangered species outweigh the risks.

AB - Recreational angling has been implicated in population declines of some marine and freshwater fish, but this activity is rarely considered as a threat or even halted when endangered species are targeted. Indeed, in some cases, anglers are drawn to fish for rare or endangered species. Conservation-oriented behaviours such as catch-and-release are often practiced voluntarily due to the ethics of anglers, yet even in these cases, some fishing mortality occurs. Nonetheless, there are many indirect conservation benefits associated with recreational angling. Here, we present a series of case-studies and consider whether catch-and-release angling for endangered fish is a conservation problem or a conservation action. If recreational angling activities contribute to population-level consequences that are contrary to recovery strategies, then angling for endangered species would seem to be a poor option. However, as revealed by several case-studies, there is much evidence that anglers are vocal and effective proponents of fish and habitat conservation, and for endangered species, they are often the only voice when other stakeholders are not engaged. Anglers may contribute directly to conservation actions via user fees (e.g. licences), philanthropic donations or by volunteering in research, education and restoration activities. However, it is important to quantify post-release mortality as well as understand the full suite of factors influencing a given population or species to know the potential risks. A risk assessment approach outlined in the paper may be used by managers to determine when the benefits of angling for endangered species outweigh the risks.

KW - Conservation

KW - Endangered fish

KW - Recreational angling

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893842886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893842886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/faf.12076

DO - 10.1111/faf.12076

M3 - Article

JO - Fish and Fisheries

JF - Fish and Fisheries

SN - 1467-2960

ER -