Angiosarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case series of seven patients from a single institution

Vaia Florou, Andrew E. Rosenberg, Eric Wieder, Krishna V. Komanduri, Despina Kolonias, Mohamed Uduman, John C. Castle, Jennifer S. Buell, Jonathan C. Trent, Breelyn A. Wilky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Results: We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29%) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43%) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions: This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number213
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 8 2019

Fingerprint

Hemangiosarcoma
Immunotherapy
Skin
Genetic Heterogeneity
Sarcoma
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Angiosarcoma
  • Checkpoint inhibitors
  • CTLA-4 antibody
  • Fusions
  • Tumor mutation burden

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Angiosarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors : A case series of seven patients from a single institution. / Florou, Vaia; Rosenberg, Andrew E.; Wieder, Eric; Komanduri, Krishna V.; Kolonias, Despina; Uduman, Mohamed; Castle, John C.; Buell, Jennifer S.; Trent, Jonathan C.; Wilky, Breelyn A.

In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Vol. 7, No. 1, 213, 08.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{463cab2af1bc433d8a20a027158fb6c1,
title = "Angiosarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case series of seven patients from a single institution",
abstract = "Background: Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Results: We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71{\%}) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29{\%}) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43{\%}) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions: This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.",
keywords = "Angiosarcoma, Checkpoint inhibitors, CTLA-4 antibody, Fusions, Tumor mutation burden",
author = "Vaia Florou and Rosenberg, {Andrew E.} and Eric Wieder and Komanduri, {Krishna V.} and Despina Kolonias and Mohamed Uduman and Castle, {John C.} and Buell, {Jennifer S.} and Trent, {Jonathan C.} and Wilky, {Breelyn A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/s40425-019-0689-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer",
issn = "2051-1426",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angiosarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

T2 - A case series of seven patients from a single institution

AU - Florou, Vaia

AU - Rosenberg, Andrew E.

AU - Wieder, Eric

AU - Komanduri, Krishna V.

AU - Kolonias, Despina

AU - Uduman, Mohamed

AU - Castle, John C.

AU - Buell, Jennifer S.

AU - Trent, Jonathan C.

AU - Wilky, Breelyn A.

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - Background: Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Results: We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29%) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43%) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions: This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.

AB - Background: Angiosarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignancy and a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Due to its infiltrative nature, successful management of localized angiosarcoma is often challenging. Systemic chemotherapy is used in the metastatic setting and occasionally in patients with high-risk localized disease in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. However, responses tend to be short-lived and most patients succumb to metastatic disease. Novel therapies are needed for patients with angiosarcomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, who were treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected their clinical information and outcome measurements. In one patient with achieved complete response, we analyzed circulating and infiltrating T cells within peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Results: We have treated seven angiosarcoma (AS) patients with checkpoint inhibitors either in the context of clinical trials or off label [Pembrolizumab + Axitinib (NCT02636725; n = 1), AGEN1884, a CTLA-4 inhibitor (NCT02694822; n = 2), Pembrolizumab (n = 4)]. Five patients had cutaneous angiosarcoma, one primary breast angiosarcoma and one radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma. At 12 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) had partial response of their lesions either on imaging and/or clinical exam and two (29%) had progressive disease. 6/7 patients are alive to date and, thus far, 3/7 patients (43%) have progressed (median 3.4 months)- one achieved partial response after pembrolizumab was switched to ongoing Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, one died of progressive disease at 31 weeks (primary breast angiosarcoma) and one was placed on pazopanib. One patient had a complete response (CR) following extended treatment with monotherapy AGEN1884. No patient experienced any ≥ grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions: This case series underscores the value of targeted immunotherapy in treating angiosarcoma. It also identifies genetic heterogeneity of cutaneous angiosarcomas and discusses specific genetic findings that may explain reported benefits from immunotherapy.

KW - Angiosarcoma

KW - Checkpoint inhibitors

KW - CTLA-4 antibody

KW - Fusions

KW - Tumor mutation burden

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070446324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070446324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40425-019-0689-7

DO - 10.1186/s40425-019-0689-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 31395100

AN - SCOPUS:85070446324

VL - 7

JO - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

SN - 2051-1426

IS - 1

M1 - 213

ER -