Anesthetic Implications of Ebola Patient Management: A Review of the Literature and Policies

Andres Missair, Michael J. Marino, Catherine N. Vu, Juan Gutierrez, Alfredo Missair, Brian Osman, Ralf E Gebhard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As of mid-October 2014, the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa has affected approximately 10,000 patients, approached a 50% mortality rate, and crossed political and geographic borders without precedent. The disease has spread throughout Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Isolated cases have arrived in urban centers in Europe and North America. The exponential growth, currently unabated, highlights the urgent need for effective and immediate management protocols for the various health care subspecialties that may care for Ebola virus disease patients. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to identify key areas of anesthetic care affected by this disease. The serious potential for “high-risk exposure” and “direct contact” (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of anesthesiologists caring for Ebola patients prompted this urgent investigation. A search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, MeSH, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. Key words included “anesthesia” and/or “ebola” combined with “surgery,” “intubation,” “laryngoscopy,” “bronchoscopy,” “stethoscope,” “ventilation,” “ventilator,” “phlebotomy,” “venous cannulation,” “operating room,” “personal protection,” “equipment,” “aerosol,” “respiratory failure,” or “needle stick.” No language or date limits were applied. We also included secondary-source data from government organizations and scientific societies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Surgeons. Articles were reviewed for primary-source data related to inpatient management of Ebola cases as well as evidence-based management guidelines and protocols for the care of Ebola patients in the operative room, infection control, and health care worker personal protection. Two hundred thirty-six articles were identified using the aforementioned terminology in the scientific database search engines. Twenty articles met search criteria for information related to inpatient Ebola virus disease management or animal virology studies as primary or secondary sources. In addition, 9 articles met search criteria as tertiary sources, representing published guidelines. The recommendations developed in this article are based on these 29 source documents. Anesthesia-specific literature regarding the care of Ebola patients is very limited. Secondary-source guidelines and policies represent the majority of available information. Data from controlled animal experiments and tuberculosis patient research provide some evidence for the existing recommendations and identify future guideline considerations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 30 2014

Fingerprint

Anesthetics
Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever
Guidelines
Information Storage and Retrieval
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Inpatients
Patient Care
Anesthesia
Liberia
Sierra Leone
Stethoscopes
Guinea
Needlestick Injuries
Delivery of Health Care
Search Engine
Laryngoscopy
Virology
Western Africa
Phlebotomy
Case Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Anesthetic Implications of Ebola Patient Management : A Review of the Literature and Policies. / Missair, Andres; Marino, Michael J.; Vu, Catherine N.; Gutierrez, Juan; Missair, Alfredo; Osman, Brian; Gebhard, Ralf E.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, 30.12.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0d6acdcabb140b0af2f807ebc0a8b56,
title = "Anesthetic Implications of Ebola Patient Management: A Review of the Literature and Policies",
abstract = "As of mid-October 2014, the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa has affected approximately 10,000 patients, approached a 50{\%} mortality rate, and crossed political and geographic borders without precedent. The disease has spread throughout Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Isolated cases have arrived in urban centers in Europe and North America. The exponential growth, currently unabated, highlights the urgent need for effective and immediate management protocols for the various health care subspecialties that may care for Ebola virus disease patients. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to identify key areas of anesthetic care affected by this disease. The serious potential for “high-risk exposure” and “direct contact” (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of anesthesiologists caring for Ebola patients prompted this urgent investigation. A search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, MeSH, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. Key words included “anesthesia” and/or “ebola” combined with “surgery,” “intubation,” “laryngoscopy,” “bronchoscopy,” “stethoscope,” “ventilation,” “ventilator,” “phlebotomy,” “venous cannulation,” “operating room,” “personal protection,” “equipment,” “aerosol,” “respiratory failure,” or “needle stick.” No language or date limits were applied. We also included secondary-source data from government organizations and scientific societies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Surgeons. Articles were reviewed for primary-source data related to inpatient management of Ebola cases as well as evidence-based management guidelines and protocols for the care of Ebola patients in the operative room, infection control, and health care worker personal protection. Two hundred thirty-six articles were identified using the aforementioned terminology in the scientific database search engines. Twenty articles met search criteria for information related to inpatient Ebola virus disease management or animal virology studies as primary or secondary sources. In addition, 9 articles met search criteria as tertiary sources, representing published guidelines. The recommendations developed in this article are based on these 29 source documents. Anesthesia-specific literature regarding the care of Ebola patients is very limited. Secondary-source guidelines and policies represent the majority of available information. Data from controlled animal experiments and tuberculosis patient research provide some evidence for the existing recommendations and identify future guideline considerations.",
author = "Andres Missair and Marino, {Michael J.} and Vu, {Catherine N.} and Juan Gutierrez and Alfredo Missair and Brian Osman and Gebhard, {Ralf E}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0000000000000573",
language = "English",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anesthetic Implications of Ebola Patient Management

T2 - A Review of the Literature and Policies

AU - Missair, Andres

AU - Marino, Michael J.

AU - Vu, Catherine N.

AU - Gutierrez, Juan

AU - Missair, Alfredo

AU - Osman, Brian

AU - Gebhard, Ralf E

PY - 2014/12/30

Y1 - 2014/12/30

N2 - As of mid-October 2014, the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa has affected approximately 10,000 patients, approached a 50% mortality rate, and crossed political and geographic borders without precedent. The disease has spread throughout Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Isolated cases have arrived in urban centers in Europe and North America. The exponential growth, currently unabated, highlights the urgent need for effective and immediate management protocols for the various health care subspecialties that may care for Ebola virus disease patients. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to identify key areas of anesthetic care affected by this disease. The serious potential for “high-risk exposure” and “direct contact” (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of anesthesiologists caring for Ebola patients prompted this urgent investigation. A search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, MeSH, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. Key words included “anesthesia” and/or “ebola” combined with “surgery,” “intubation,” “laryngoscopy,” “bronchoscopy,” “stethoscope,” “ventilation,” “ventilator,” “phlebotomy,” “venous cannulation,” “operating room,” “personal protection,” “equipment,” “aerosol,” “respiratory failure,” or “needle stick.” No language or date limits were applied. We also included secondary-source data from government organizations and scientific societies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Surgeons. Articles were reviewed for primary-source data related to inpatient management of Ebola cases as well as evidence-based management guidelines and protocols for the care of Ebola patients in the operative room, infection control, and health care worker personal protection. Two hundred thirty-six articles were identified using the aforementioned terminology in the scientific database search engines. Twenty articles met search criteria for information related to inpatient Ebola virus disease management or animal virology studies as primary or secondary sources. In addition, 9 articles met search criteria as tertiary sources, representing published guidelines. The recommendations developed in this article are based on these 29 source documents. Anesthesia-specific literature regarding the care of Ebola patients is very limited. Secondary-source guidelines and policies represent the majority of available information. Data from controlled animal experiments and tuberculosis patient research provide some evidence for the existing recommendations and identify future guideline considerations.

AB - As of mid-October 2014, the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa has affected approximately 10,000 patients, approached a 50% mortality rate, and crossed political and geographic borders without precedent. The disease has spread throughout Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Isolated cases have arrived in urban centers in Europe and North America. The exponential growth, currently unabated, highlights the urgent need for effective and immediate management protocols for the various health care subspecialties that may care for Ebola virus disease patients. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to identify key areas of anesthetic care affected by this disease. The serious potential for “high-risk exposure” and “direct contact” (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of anesthesiologists caring for Ebola patients prompted this urgent investigation. A search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, MeSH, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. Key words included “anesthesia” and/or “ebola” combined with “surgery,” “intubation,” “laryngoscopy,” “bronchoscopy,” “stethoscope,” “ventilation,” “ventilator,” “phlebotomy,” “venous cannulation,” “operating room,” “personal protection,” “equipment,” “aerosol,” “respiratory failure,” or “needle stick.” No language or date limits were applied. We also included secondary-source data from government organizations and scientific societies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Surgeons. Articles were reviewed for primary-source data related to inpatient management of Ebola cases as well as evidence-based management guidelines and protocols for the care of Ebola patients in the operative room, infection control, and health care worker personal protection. Two hundred thirty-six articles were identified using the aforementioned terminology in the scientific database search engines. Twenty articles met search criteria for information related to inpatient Ebola virus disease management or animal virology studies as primary or secondary sources. In addition, 9 articles met search criteria as tertiary sources, representing published guidelines. The recommendations developed in this article are based on these 29 source documents. Anesthesia-specific literature regarding the care of Ebola patients is very limited. Secondary-source guidelines and policies represent the majority of available information. Data from controlled animal experiments and tuberculosis patient research provide some evidence for the existing recommendations and identify future guideline considerations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920451013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920451013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000573

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000573

M3 - Article

C2 - 25551317

AN - SCOPUS:84940114761

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

ER -