Anesthesia information management systems: A survey of current implementation policies and practices

Richard H. Epstein, Michael M. Vigoda, David M. Feinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) implementation is increasing, but there are no published recommendations from anesthesia professional societies to guide configuration and policy decisions that affect billing, security, medical-legal, and compliance issues. METHODS: A 45-question structured survey was developed by a committee of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia and was sent to the clinical administrator at 18 separate institutions, comprising six different installed AIMS systems. The primary goal of the survey was to establish a baseline of current policies and practices. RESULTS: There was more than two-third agreement among respondents for only 25% of questions. A number of configurations reported may increase exposure to billing denial, Medicare and Medicaid noncompliance, security breeches, and medical-legal defense difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Developing guidelines by anesthesia professional organizations such as Society for Technology in Anesthesia to assist in the configuration of AIMS is recommended to help anesthesia departments avoid problems that may result in significant financial and legal risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-411
Number of pages7
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007

Fingerprint

Management Information Systems
Anesthesia
Hospital Anesthesia Department
Technology
Medicaid
Medicare
Surveys and Questionnaires
Administrative Personnel
Compliance
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Anesthesia information management systems : A survey of current implementation policies and practices. / Epstein, Richard H.; Vigoda, Michael M.; Feinstein, David M.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 105, No. 2, 01.08.2007, p. 405-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Richard H. ; Vigoda, Michael M. ; Feinstein, David M. / Anesthesia information management systems : A survey of current implementation policies and practices. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2007 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 405-411.
@article{9a9456a4958a46cbbf765f973412d54d,
title = "Anesthesia information management systems: A survey of current implementation policies and practices",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) implementation is increasing, but there are no published recommendations from anesthesia professional societies to guide configuration and policy decisions that affect billing, security, medical-legal, and compliance issues. METHODS: A 45-question structured survey was developed by a committee of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia and was sent to the clinical administrator at 18 separate institutions, comprising six different installed AIMS systems. The primary goal of the survey was to establish a baseline of current policies and practices. RESULTS: There was more than two-third agreement among respondents for only 25{\%} of questions. A number of configurations reported may increase exposure to billing denial, Medicare and Medicaid noncompliance, security breeches, and medical-legal defense difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Developing guidelines by anesthesia professional organizations such as Society for Technology in Anesthesia to assist in the configuration of AIMS is recommended to help anesthesia departments avoid problems that may result in significant financial and legal risk.",
author = "Epstein, {Richard H.} and Vigoda, {Michael M.} and Feinstein, {David M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000270214.58811.c4",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "405--411",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anesthesia information management systems

T2 - A survey of current implementation policies and practices

AU - Epstein, Richard H.

AU - Vigoda, Michael M.

AU - Feinstein, David M.

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) implementation is increasing, but there are no published recommendations from anesthesia professional societies to guide configuration and policy decisions that affect billing, security, medical-legal, and compliance issues. METHODS: A 45-question structured survey was developed by a committee of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia and was sent to the clinical administrator at 18 separate institutions, comprising six different installed AIMS systems. The primary goal of the survey was to establish a baseline of current policies and practices. RESULTS: There was more than two-third agreement among respondents for only 25% of questions. A number of configurations reported may increase exposure to billing denial, Medicare and Medicaid noncompliance, security breeches, and medical-legal defense difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Developing guidelines by anesthesia professional organizations such as Society for Technology in Anesthesia to assist in the configuration of AIMS is recommended to help anesthesia departments avoid problems that may result in significant financial and legal risk.

AB - BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) implementation is increasing, but there are no published recommendations from anesthesia professional societies to guide configuration and policy decisions that affect billing, security, medical-legal, and compliance issues. METHODS: A 45-question structured survey was developed by a committee of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia and was sent to the clinical administrator at 18 separate institutions, comprising six different installed AIMS systems. The primary goal of the survey was to establish a baseline of current policies and practices. RESULTS: There was more than two-third agreement among respondents for only 25% of questions. A number of configurations reported may increase exposure to billing denial, Medicare and Medicaid noncompliance, security breeches, and medical-legal defense difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Developing guidelines by anesthesia professional organizations such as Society for Technology in Anesthesia to assist in the configuration of AIMS is recommended to help anesthesia departments avoid problems that may result in significant financial and legal risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547609553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547609553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000270214.58811.c4

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000270214.58811.c4

M3 - Article

C2 - 17646498

AN - SCOPUS:34547609553

VL - 105

SP - 405

EP - 411

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -