ANCHORS AWAY–THE STABILITY OF MEANING OF ANCHORS WHEN THEIR LOCATION IS CHANGED

Gail Ironson, PATRICIA C. SMITH

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addresses three questions. (1) Does the meaning of the neutral anchor shift when its position is moved away from the middle of the series? The location of (psychological) zero in rating scales is crucial if they are to be used as multipliers (e.g., as weights or in functional equations). (2) Does moving the neutral anchor from a central position increase sensitivity (variance) of ratings? Such displacement has been used frequently without investigation of its effects. (3) Are any of the above effects general across types of anchors? Displacement had significant effects (N= 210) on meaning of the neutral anchor and on sensitivity. Stability of meaning of anchors, however, was greater when anchors were words rather than faces. Therefore verbal anchors should be used, with the neutral anchor located centrally, to establish zero; but displaced to increase sensitivity at one end of the scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-262
Number of pages14
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Weights and Measures
Functional equation
Multiplier
Rating
Psychological
Rating scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

ANCHORS AWAY–THE STABILITY OF MEANING OF ANCHORS WHEN THEIR LOCATION IS CHANGED. / Ironson, Gail; SMITH, PATRICIA C.

In: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1981, p. 249-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1826a69bc4824364a1f9e3d561b0be14,
title = "ANCHORS AWAY–THE STABILITY OF MEANING OF ANCHORS WHEN THEIR LOCATION IS CHANGED",
abstract = "This study addresses three questions. (1) Does the meaning of the neutral anchor shift when its position is moved away from the middle of the series? The location of (psychological) zero in rating scales is crucial if they are to be used as multipliers (e.g., as weights or in functional equations). (2) Does moving the neutral anchor from a central position increase sensitivity (variance) of ratings? Such displacement has been used frequently without investigation of its effects. (3) Are any of the above effects general across types of anchors? Displacement had significant effects (N= 210) on meaning of the neutral anchor and on sensitivity. Stability of meaning of anchors, however, was greater when anchors were words rather than faces. Therefore verbal anchors should be used, with the neutral anchor located centrally, to establish zero; but displaced to increase sensitivity at one end of the scale.",
author = "Gail Ironson and SMITH, {PATRICIA C.}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb00941.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "249--262",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ANCHORS AWAY–THE STABILITY OF MEANING OF ANCHORS WHEN THEIR LOCATION IS CHANGED

AU - Ironson, Gail

AU - SMITH, PATRICIA C.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - This study addresses three questions. (1) Does the meaning of the neutral anchor shift when its position is moved away from the middle of the series? The location of (psychological) zero in rating scales is crucial if they are to be used as multipliers (e.g., as weights or in functional equations). (2) Does moving the neutral anchor from a central position increase sensitivity (variance) of ratings? Such displacement has been used frequently without investigation of its effects. (3) Are any of the above effects general across types of anchors? Displacement had significant effects (N= 210) on meaning of the neutral anchor and on sensitivity. Stability of meaning of anchors, however, was greater when anchors were words rather than faces. Therefore verbal anchors should be used, with the neutral anchor located centrally, to establish zero; but displaced to increase sensitivity at one end of the scale.

AB - This study addresses three questions. (1) Does the meaning of the neutral anchor shift when its position is moved away from the middle of the series? The location of (psychological) zero in rating scales is crucial if they are to be used as multipliers (e.g., as weights or in functional equations). (2) Does moving the neutral anchor from a central position increase sensitivity (variance) of ratings? Such displacement has been used frequently without investigation of its effects. (3) Are any of the above effects general across types of anchors? Displacement had significant effects (N= 210) on meaning of the neutral anchor and on sensitivity. Stability of meaning of anchors, however, was greater when anchors were words rather than faces. Therefore verbal anchors should be used, with the neutral anchor located centrally, to establish zero; but displaced to increase sensitivity at one end of the scale.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970372041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970372041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb00941.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb00941.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 249

EP - 262

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

IS - 2

ER -