Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation

Ivaylo B Mihaylov, F. A. Lerma, Y. Wu, J. V. Siebers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A hybrid dose-computation method is designed which accurately accounts for multileaf collimator (MLC)-induced intensity modulation in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. The method employs Monte Carlo (MC) modeling to determine the fluence modulation caused by the delivery of dynamic or multisegmental (step-and-shoot) MLC fields, and a conventional dose-computation algorithm to estimate the delivered dose to a phantom or a patient. Thus, it determines the IMRT fluence prediction accuracy achievable by analytic methods in the limit that the analytic method includes all details of the MLC leaf transport and scatter. The hybrid method is validated and benchmarked by comparison with in-phantom film dose measurements, as well as dose calculations from two in-house, and two commercial treatment planning system analytic fluence estimation methods. All computation methods utilize the same dose algorithm to calculate dose to a phantom, varying only in the estimation of the MLC modulation of the incident photon energy fluence. Gamma analysis, with respect to measured two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, is used to benchmark each algorithm's performance. The analyzed fields include static and dynamic test patterns, as well as fields from ten DMLC IMRT treatment plans (79 fields) and five SMLC treatment plans (29 fields). The test fields (fully closed MLC, picket fence, sliding windows of different size, and leaf-tip profiles) cover the extremes of MLC usage during IMRT, while the patient fields represent realistic clinical conditions. Of the methods tested, the hybrid method most accurately reproduces measurements. For the hybrid method, 79 of 79 DMLC field calculations have γ≤1 (3%3 mm) for more than 95% of the points (per field) while for SMLC fields, 27 of 29 pass the same criteria. The analytic energy fluence estimation methods show inferior pass rates, with 76 of 79 DMLC and 24 of 29 SMLC fields having more than 95% of the test points with γ≤1 (3%3 mm). Paired one-way ANOVA tests of the gamma analysis results found that the hybrid method better predicts measurements in terms of both the fraction of points with γ≤1 and the average gamma for both 2%2 mm and 3%3 mm criteria. These results quantify the enhancement in accuracy in IMRT dose calculations when MC is used to model the MLC field modulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)828-839
Number of pages12
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Monte Carlo Method
Benchmarking
Photons
Analysis of Variance
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Dose computation
  • Fluence
  • IMRT
  • MLC
  • Monte Carlo simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation. / Mihaylov, Ivaylo B; Lerma, F. A.; Wu, Y.; Siebers, J. V.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 828-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mihaylov, Ivaylo B ; Lerma, F. A. ; Wu, Y. ; Siebers, J. V. / Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 828-839.
@article{c7df4f3c85e44e6aa0108dbcd4f34df9,
title = "Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation",
abstract = "A hybrid dose-computation method is designed which accurately accounts for multileaf collimator (MLC)-induced intensity modulation in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. The method employs Monte Carlo (MC) modeling to determine the fluence modulation caused by the delivery of dynamic or multisegmental (step-and-shoot) MLC fields, and a conventional dose-computation algorithm to estimate the delivered dose to a phantom or a patient. Thus, it determines the IMRT fluence prediction accuracy achievable by analytic methods in the limit that the analytic method includes all details of the MLC leaf transport and scatter. The hybrid method is validated and benchmarked by comparison with in-phantom film dose measurements, as well as dose calculations from two in-house, and two commercial treatment planning system analytic fluence estimation methods. All computation methods utilize the same dose algorithm to calculate dose to a phantom, varying only in the estimation of the MLC modulation of the incident photon energy fluence. Gamma analysis, with respect to measured two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, is used to benchmark each algorithm's performance. The analyzed fields include static and dynamic test patterns, as well as fields from ten DMLC IMRT treatment plans (79 fields) and five SMLC treatment plans (29 fields). The test fields (fully closed MLC, picket fence, sliding windows of different size, and leaf-tip profiles) cover the extremes of MLC usage during IMRT, while the patient fields represent realistic clinical conditions. Of the methods tested, the hybrid method most accurately reproduces measurements. For the hybrid method, 79 of 79 DMLC field calculations have γ≤1 (3{\%}3 mm) for more than 95{\%} of the points (per field) while for SMLC fields, 27 of 29 pass the same criteria. The analytic energy fluence estimation methods show inferior pass rates, with 76 of 79 DMLC and 24 of 29 SMLC fields having more than 95{\%} of the test points with γ≤1 (3{\%}3 mm). Paired one-way ANOVA tests of the gamma analysis results found that the hybrid method better predicts measurements in terms of both the fraction of points with γ≤1 and the average gamma for both 2{\%}2 mm and 3{\%}3 mm criteria. These results quantify the enhancement in accuracy in IMRT dose calculations when MC is used to model the MLC field modulation.",
keywords = "Dose computation, Fluence, IMRT, MLC, Monte Carlo simulation",
author = "Mihaylov, {Ivaylo B} and Lerma, {F. A.} and Y. Wu and Siebers, {J. V.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1118/1.2178449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "828--839",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation

AU - Mihaylov, Ivaylo B

AU - Lerma, F. A.

AU - Wu, Y.

AU - Siebers, J. V.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - A hybrid dose-computation method is designed which accurately accounts for multileaf collimator (MLC)-induced intensity modulation in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. The method employs Monte Carlo (MC) modeling to determine the fluence modulation caused by the delivery of dynamic or multisegmental (step-and-shoot) MLC fields, and a conventional dose-computation algorithm to estimate the delivered dose to a phantom or a patient. Thus, it determines the IMRT fluence prediction accuracy achievable by analytic methods in the limit that the analytic method includes all details of the MLC leaf transport and scatter. The hybrid method is validated and benchmarked by comparison with in-phantom film dose measurements, as well as dose calculations from two in-house, and two commercial treatment planning system analytic fluence estimation methods. All computation methods utilize the same dose algorithm to calculate dose to a phantom, varying only in the estimation of the MLC modulation of the incident photon energy fluence. Gamma analysis, with respect to measured two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, is used to benchmark each algorithm's performance. The analyzed fields include static and dynamic test patterns, as well as fields from ten DMLC IMRT treatment plans (79 fields) and five SMLC treatment plans (29 fields). The test fields (fully closed MLC, picket fence, sliding windows of different size, and leaf-tip profiles) cover the extremes of MLC usage during IMRT, while the patient fields represent realistic clinical conditions. Of the methods tested, the hybrid method most accurately reproduces measurements. For the hybrid method, 79 of 79 DMLC field calculations have γ≤1 (3%3 mm) for more than 95% of the points (per field) while for SMLC fields, 27 of 29 pass the same criteria. The analytic energy fluence estimation methods show inferior pass rates, with 76 of 79 DMLC and 24 of 29 SMLC fields having more than 95% of the test points with γ≤1 (3%3 mm). Paired one-way ANOVA tests of the gamma analysis results found that the hybrid method better predicts measurements in terms of both the fraction of points with γ≤1 and the average gamma for both 2%2 mm and 3%3 mm criteria. These results quantify the enhancement in accuracy in IMRT dose calculations when MC is used to model the MLC field modulation.

AB - A hybrid dose-computation method is designed which accurately accounts for multileaf collimator (MLC)-induced intensity modulation in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. The method employs Monte Carlo (MC) modeling to determine the fluence modulation caused by the delivery of dynamic or multisegmental (step-and-shoot) MLC fields, and a conventional dose-computation algorithm to estimate the delivered dose to a phantom or a patient. Thus, it determines the IMRT fluence prediction accuracy achievable by analytic methods in the limit that the analytic method includes all details of the MLC leaf transport and scatter. The hybrid method is validated and benchmarked by comparison with in-phantom film dose measurements, as well as dose calculations from two in-house, and two commercial treatment planning system analytic fluence estimation methods. All computation methods utilize the same dose algorithm to calculate dose to a phantom, varying only in the estimation of the MLC modulation of the incident photon energy fluence. Gamma analysis, with respect to measured two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, is used to benchmark each algorithm's performance. The analyzed fields include static and dynamic test patterns, as well as fields from ten DMLC IMRT treatment plans (79 fields) and five SMLC treatment plans (29 fields). The test fields (fully closed MLC, picket fence, sliding windows of different size, and leaf-tip profiles) cover the extremes of MLC usage during IMRT, while the patient fields represent realistic clinical conditions. Of the methods tested, the hybrid method most accurately reproduces measurements. For the hybrid method, 79 of 79 DMLC field calculations have γ≤1 (3%3 mm) for more than 95% of the points (per field) while for SMLC fields, 27 of 29 pass the same criteria. The analytic energy fluence estimation methods show inferior pass rates, with 76 of 79 DMLC and 24 of 29 SMLC fields having more than 95% of the test points with γ≤1 (3%3 mm). Paired one-way ANOVA tests of the gamma analysis results found that the hybrid method better predicts measurements in terms of both the fraction of points with γ≤1 and the average gamma for both 2%2 mm and 3%3 mm criteria. These results quantify the enhancement in accuracy in IMRT dose calculations when MC is used to model the MLC field modulation.

KW - Dose computation

KW - Fluence

KW - IMRT

KW - MLC

KW - Monte Carlo simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645506880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645506880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2178449

DO - 10.1118/1.2178449

M3 - Article

C2 - 16696458

AN - SCOPUS:33645506880

VL - 33

SP - 828

EP - 839

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 4

ER -