Analysis of support apparatus for flexural load-deflection testing: Minimizing bias caused by arching forces

Ronald F. Zollo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is in the best interests of standards development that bias and inter-laboratory variability be minimized in the reporting of test results. However, the apparatus sections of flexural test standards, such as ASTM C78, C1399, C1550, and C1609, may not adequately address important issues raised in this study that could adversely affect test results. Specifically, current standards specifications fail to address arching forces and effective span control. The mechanics of commonly applied journal-bearing-type support designs are analyzed and compared to an alternative ball or needle-bearing-type support design. The analysis demonstrates that significant bias can be introduced as a direct consequence of the mechanics that is the nature of journal-bearing-type supports. The analysis applies equally well to flexural tests involving small deformations of portland cement concrete or similar brittle materials, as it does to tests that are carried out involving relatively large deformations, such as with fiber-reinforced concrete.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Testing and Evaluation
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Journal bearings
Mechanics
Testing
Bearings (structural)
Portland cement
Brittleness
Needles
Reinforced concrete
Concretes
Specifications
Fibers

Keywords

  • Beam-support design
  • Fiber reinforced concrete
  • Flexural arching
  • Flexural test bias
  • Flexural testing
  • Large deflection apparatus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Analysis of support apparatus for flexural load-deflection testing : Minimizing bias caused by arching forces. / Zollo, Ronald F.

In: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0951dd4614e2452b960c3debc3be81ac,
title = "Analysis of support apparatus for flexural load-deflection testing: Minimizing bias caused by arching forces",
abstract = "It is in the best interests of standards development that bias and inter-laboratory variability be minimized in the reporting of test results. However, the apparatus sections of flexural test standards, such as ASTM C78, C1399, C1550, and C1609, may not adequately address important issues raised in this study that could adversely affect test results. Specifically, current standards specifications fail to address arching forces and effective span control. The mechanics of commonly applied journal-bearing-type support designs are analyzed and compared to an alternative ball or needle-bearing-type support design. The analysis demonstrates that significant bias can be introduced as a direct consequence of the mechanics that is the nature of journal-bearing-type supports. The analysis applies equally well to flexural tests involving small deformations of portland cement concrete or similar brittle materials, as it does to tests that are carried out involving relatively large deformations, such as with fiber-reinforced concrete.",
keywords = "Beam-support design, Fiber reinforced concrete, Flexural arching, Flexural test bias, Flexural testing, Large deflection apparatus",
author = "Zollo, {Ronald F.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1520/JTE104251",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
journal = "Journal of Testing and Evaluation",
issn = "0090-3973",
publisher = "American Society for Testing and Materials",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of support apparatus for flexural load-deflection testing

T2 - Minimizing bias caused by arching forces

AU - Zollo, Ronald F.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - It is in the best interests of standards development that bias and inter-laboratory variability be minimized in the reporting of test results. However, the apparatus sections of flexural test standards, such as ASTM C78, C1399, C1550, and C1609, may not adequately address important issues raised in this study that could adversely affect test results. Specifically, current standards specifications fail to address arching forces and effective span control. The mechanics of commonly applied journal-bearing-type support designs are analyzed and compared to an alternative ball or needle-bearing-type support design. The analysis demonstrates that significant bias can be introduced as a direct consequence of the mechanics that is the nature of journal-bearing-type supports. The analysis applies equally well to flexural tests involving small deformations of portland cement concrete or similar brittle materials, as it does to tests that are carried out involving relatively large deformations, such as with fiber-reinforced concrete.

AB - It is in the best interests of standards development that bias and inter-laboratory variability be minimized in the reporting of test results. However, the apparatus sections of flexural test standards, such as ASTM C78, C1399, C1550, and C1609, may not adequately address important issues raised in this study that could adversely affect test results. Specifically, current standards specifications fail to address arching forces and effective span control. The mechanics of commonly applied journal-bearing-type support designs are analyzed and compared to an alternative ball or needle-bearing-type support design. The analysis demonstrates that significant bias can be introduced as a direct consequence of the mechanics that is the nature of journal-bearing-type supports. The analysis applies equally well to flexural tests involving small deformations of portland cement concrete or similar brittle materials, as it does to tests that are carried out involving relatively large deformations, such as with fiber-reinforced concrete.

KW - Beam-support design

KW - Fiber reinforced concrete

KW - Flexural arching

KW - Flexural test bias

KW - Flexural testing

KW - Large deflection apparatus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875471650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875471650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1520/JTE104251

DO - 10.1520/JTE104251

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875471650

VL - 41

JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

SN - 0090-3973

IS - 1

ER -