Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991

Alexey Kaplan, Mark A. Cane, Yochanan Kushnir, Amy C Clement, M. Benno Blumenthal, Balaji Rajagopalan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global analyses of monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies from 1856 to 1991 are produced using three statistically based methods: optimal smoothing (OS), the Kaiman filter (KF) and optimal interpolation (OI). Each of these is accompanied by estimates of the error covariance of the analyzed fields. The spatial covariance function these methods require is estimated from the available data; the timemarching model is a first-order autoregressive model again estimated from data. The data input for the analyses are monthly anomalies from the United Kingdom Meteorological Office historical sea surface temperature data set (MOHSST5) [Parker et al., 1994] of the Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas (GOSTA) [Bottomley et al., 1990]. These analyses are compared with each other, with GOSTA, and with an analysis generated by projection (P) onto a set of empirical orthogonal functions (as in Smith et al. [1996]). In theory, the quality of the analyses should rank in the order OS, KF, OI, P, and GOSTA. It is found that the first four give comparable results in the data-rich periods (1951-1991), but at times when data is sparse the first three differ significantly from P and GOSTA. At these times the latter two often have extreme and fluctuating values, prima facie evidence of error. The statistical schemes are also verified against data not used in any of the analyses (proxy records derived from corals and air temperature records from coastal and island stations). We also present evidence that the analysis error estimates are indeed indicative of the quality of the products. At most times the OS and KF products are close to the OI product, but at times of especially poor coverage their use of information from other times is advantageous. The methods appear to reconstruct the major features of the global SST field from very sparse data. Comparison with other indications of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle show that the analyses provide usable information on interannual variability as far back as the 1860s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18567-18589
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans
Volume103
Issue numberC9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ocean temperature
ocean surface
sea surface temperature
surface temperature
smoothing
interpolation
global ocean
atlas
filters
sea surface
products
Interpolation
anomalies
orthogonal functions
Southern Oscillation
Temperature
United Kingdom
filter
error analysis
estimates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Oceanography

Cite this

Kaplan, A., Cane, M. A., Kushnir, Y., Clement, A. C., Blumenthal, M. B., & Rajagopalan, B. (1998). Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991. Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, 103(C9), 18567-18589. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01736

Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991. / Kaplan, Alexey; Cane, Mark A.; Kushnir, Yochanan; Clement, Amy C; Blumenthal, M. Benno; Rajagopalan, Balaji.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, Vol. 103, No. C9, 15.08.1998, p. 18567-18589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaplan, A, Cane, MA, Kushnir, Y, Clement, AC, Blumenthal, MB & Rajagopalan, B 1998, 'Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991', Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, vol. 103, no. C9, pp. 18567-18589. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01736
Kaplan A, Cane MA, Kushnir Y, Clement AC, Blumenthal MB, Rajagopalan B. Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991. Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans. 1998 Aug 15;103(C9):18567-18589. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01736
Kaplan, Alexey ; Cane, Mark A. ; Kushnir, Yochanan ; Clement, Amy C ; Blumenthal, M. Benno ; Rajagopalan, Balaji. / Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991. In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans. 1998 ; Vol. 103, No. C9. pp. 18567-18589.
@article{e4951eb418764361b712e06207c048bb,
title = "Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991",
abstract = "Global analyses of monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies from 1856 to 1991 are produced using three statistically based methods: optimal smoothing (OS), the Kaiman filter (KF) and optimal interpolation (OI). Each of these is accompanied by estimates of the error covariance of the analyzed fields. The spatial covariance function these methods require is estimated from the available data; the timemarching model is a first-order autoregressive model again estimated from data. The data input for the analyses are monthly anomalies from the United Kingdom Meteorological Office historical sea surface temperature data set (MOHSST5) [Parker et al., 1994] of the Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas (GOSTA) [Bottomley et al., 1990]. These analyses are compared with each other, with GOSTA, and with an analysis generated by projection (P) onto a set of empirical orthogonal functions (as in Smith et al. [1996]). In theory, the quality of the analyses should rank in the order OS, KF, OI, P, and GOSTA. It is found that the first four give comparable results in the data-rich periods (1951-1991), but at times when data is sparse the first three differ significantly from P and GOSTA. At these times the latter two often have extreme and fluctuating values, prima facie evidence of error. The statistical schemes are also verified against data not used in any of the analyses (proxy records derived from corals and air temperature records from coastal and island stations). We also present evidence that the analysis error estimates are indeed indicative of the quality of the products. At most times the OS and KF products are close to the OI product, but at times of especially poor coverage their use of information from other times is advantageous. The methods appear to reconstruct the major features of the global SST field from very sparse data. Comparison with other indications of the El Ni{\~n}o-Southern Oscillation cycle show that the analyses provide usable information on interannual variability as far back as the 1860s.",
author = "Alexey Kaplan and Cane, {Mark A.} and Yochanan Kushnir and Clement, {Amy C} and Blumenthal, {M. Benno} and Balaji Rajagopalan",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1029/97JC01736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "18567--18589",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "C9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856-1991

AU - Kaplan, Alexey

AU - Cane, Mark A.

AU - Kushnir, Yochanan

AU - Clement, Amy C

AU - Blumenthal, M. Benno

AU - Rajagopalan, Balaji

PY - 1998/8/15

Y1 - 1998/8/15

N2 - Global analyses of monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies from 1856 to 1991 are produced using three statistically based methods: optimal smoothing (OS), the Kaiman filter (KF) and optimal interpolation (OI). Each of these is accompanied by estimates of the error covariance of the analyzed fields. The spatial covariance function these methods require is estimated from the available data; the timemarching model is a first-order autoregressive model again estimated from data. The data input for the analyses are monthly anomalies from the United Kingdom Meteorological Office historical sea surface temperature data set (MOHSST5) [Parker et al., 1994] of the Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas (GOSTA) [Bottomley et al., 1990]. These analyses are compared with each other, with GOSTA, and with an analysis generated by projection (P) onto a set of empirical orthogonal functions (as in Smith et al. [1996]). In theory, the quality of the analyses should rank in the order OS, KF, OI, P, and GOSTA. It is found that the first four give comparable results in the data-rich periods (1951-1991), but at times when data is sparse the first three differ significantly from P and GOSTA. At these times the latter two often have extreme and fluctuating values, prima facie evidence of error. The statistical schemes are also verified against data not used in any of the analyses (proxy records derived from corals and air temperature records from coastal and island stations). We also present evidence that the analysis error estimates are indeed indicative of the quality of the products. At most times the OS and KF products are close to the OI product, but at times of especially poor coverage their use of information from other times is advantageous. The methods appear to reconstruct the major features of the global SST field from very sparse data. Comparison with other indications of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle show that the analyses provide usable information on interannual variability as far back as the 1860s.

AB - Global analyses of monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies from 1856 to 1991 are produced using three statistically based methods: optimal smoothing (OS), the Kaiman filter (KF) and optimal interpolation (OI). Each of these is accompanied by estimates of the error covariance of the analyzed fields. The spatial covariance function these methods require is estimated from the available data; the timemarching model is a first-order autoregressive model again estimated from data. The data input for the analyses are monthly anomalies from the United Kingdom Meteorological Office historical sea surface temperature data set (MOHSST5) [Parker et al., 1994] of the Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas (GOSTA) [Bottomley et al., 1990]. These analyses are compared with each other, with GOSTA, and with an analysis generated by projection (P) onto a set of empirical orthogonal functions (as in Smith et al. [1996]). In theory, the quality of the analyses should rank in the order OS, KF, OI, P, and GOSTA. It is found that the first four give comparable results in the data-rich periods (1951-1991), but at times when data is sparse the first three differ significantly from P and GOSTA. At these times the latter two often have extreme and fluctuating values, prima facie evidence of error. The statistical schemes are also verified against data not used in any of the analyses (proxy records derived from corals and air temperature records from coastal and island stations). We also present evidence that the analysis error estimates are indeed indicative of the quality of the products. At most times the OS and KF products are close to the OI product, but at times of especially poor coverage their use of information from other times is advantageous. The methods appear to reconstruct the major features of the global SST field from very sparse data. Comparison with other indications of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle show that the analyses provide usable information on interannual variability as far back as the 1860s.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959172280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959172280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/97JC01736

DO - 10.1029/97JC01736

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 18567

EP - 18589

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

IS - C9

ER -