An Exploratory Electromyography-Based Coactivation Index for the Cervical Spine

Peter Le, Alexander Aurand, Thomas Best, Safdar N. Khan, Ehud Mendel, William S. Marras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Develop a coactivation index for the neck and test its effectiveness with complex dynamic head motions. Background: Studies describing coactivation for the cervical spine are sparse in the literature. Of those in existence, they were either limited to a priori definitions of agonist/antagonist activity that limited the testing to sagittal and lateral planes or consisted of isometric exertions. Multiplanar movements would allow for a more realistic understanding of naturalistic movements in the cervical spine and propensity for neck pain. However, a gap in the literature exists in which a method to describe coactivation during complex dynamic motions does not exist for the cervical spine. Methods: An electromyography-based coactivation index was developed for the cervical spine based on previously tested methodology used on the lumbar spine without a high-end model and tested using a series of different postures and speeds. Results: Complex motions involving twisting (i.e., flexion and twisting) and higher speed had higher magnitudes of coactivation than uniplanar motions in the sagittal or lateral plane, which was expected. The coupled motion of flexion and twisting showed four to five times higher coactivation than uniplanar (sagittal or lateral) movements. Conclusion: The coactivation index developed accommodates multiplanar, naturalistic movements. Testing of the index showed that motions requiring higher degrees of head control had higher effort due to coactivation, which was expected. Application: Overall, this coactivation index may be utilized to understand the neuromuscular effort of various tasks in the cervical spine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-79
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Factors
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electromyography
Spine
Testing
Head
Neck Pain
pain
Posture
Neck
methodology

Keywords

  • co-contraction
  • coactivation
  • neck muscles
  • neuromuscular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

An Exploratory Electromyography-Based Coactivation Index for the Cervical Spine. / Le, Peter; Aurand, Alexander; Best, Thomas; Khan, Safdar N.; Mendel, Ehud; Marras, William S.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 68-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Le, Peter ; Aurand, Alexander ; Best, Thomas ; Khan, Safdar N. ; Mendel, Ehud ; Marras, William S. / An Exploratory Electromyography-Based Coactivation Index for the Cervical Spine. In: Human Factors. 2018 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 68-79.
@article{de3c5283d5c3418c9dc48ca8e4c563b9,
title = "An Exploratory Electromyography-Based Coactivation Index for the Cervical Spine",
abstract = "Objective: Develop a coactivation index for the neck and test its effectiveness with complex dynamic head motions. Background: Studies describing coactivation for the cervical spine are sparse in the literature. Of those in existence, they were either limited to a priori definitions of agonist/antagonist activity that limited the testing to sagittal and lateral planes or consisted of isometric exertions. Multiplanar movements would allow for a more realistic understanding of naturalistic movements in the cervical spine and propensity for neck pain. However, a gap in the literature exists in which a method to describe coactivation during complex dynamic motions does not exist for the cervical spine. Methods: An electromyography-based coactivation index was developed for the cervical spine based on previously tested methodology used on the lumbar spine without a high-end model and tested using a series of different postures and speeds. Results: Complex motions involving twisting (i.e., flexion and twisting) and higher speed had higher magnitudes of coactivation than uniplanar motions in the sagittal or lateral plane, which was expected. The coupled motion of flexion and twisting showed four to five times higher coactivation than uniplanar (sagittal or lateral) movements. Conclusion: The coactivation index developed accommodates multiplanar, naturalistic movements. Testing of the index showed that motions requiring higher degrees of head control had higher effort due to coactivation, which was expected. Application: Overall, this coactivation index may be utilized to understand the neuromuscular effort of various tasks in the cervical spine.",
keywords = "co-contraction, coactivation, neck muscles, neuromuscular",
author = "Peter Le and Alexander Aurand and Thomas Best and Khan, {Safdar N.} and Ehud Mendel and Marras, {William S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018720817738598",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "68--79",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Exploratory Electromyography-Based Coactivation Index for the Cervical Spine

AU - Le, Peter

AU - Aurand, Alexander

AU - Best, Thomas

AU - Khan, Safdar N.

AU - Mendel, Ehud

AU - Marras, William S.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Objective: Develop a coactivation index for the neck and test its effectiveness with complex dynamic head motions. Background: Studies describing coactivation for the cervical spine are sparse in the literature. Of those in existence, they were either limited to a priori definitions of agonist/antagonist activity that limited the testing to sagittal and lateral planes or consisted of isometric exertions. Multiplanar movements would allow for a more realistic understanding of naturalistic movements in the cervical spine and propensity for neck pain. However, a gap in the literature exists in which a method to describe coactivation during complex dynamic motions does not exist for the cervical spine. Methods: An electromyography-based coactivation index was developed for the cervical spine based on previously tested methodology used on the lumbar spine without a high-end model and tested using a series of different postures and speeds. Results: Complex motions involving twisting (i.e., flexion and twisting) and higher speed had higher magnitudes of coactivation than uniplanar motions in the sagittal or lateral plane, which was expected. The coupled motion of flexion and twisting showed four to five times higher coactivation than uniplanar (sagittal or lateral) movements. Conclusion: The coactivation index developed accommodates multiplanar, naturalistic movements. Testing of the index showed that motions requiring higher degrees of head control had higher effort due to coactivation, which was expected. Application: Overall, this coactivation index may be utilized to understand the neuromuscular effort of various tasks in the cervical spine.

AB - Objective: Develop a coactivation index for the neck and test its effectiveness with complex dynamic head motions. Background: Studies describing coactivation for the cervical spine are sparse in the literature. Of those in existence, they were either limited to a priori definitions of agonist/antagonist activity that limited the testing to sagittal and lateral planes or consisted of isometric exertions. Multiplanar movements would allow for a more realistic understanding of naturalistic movements in the cervical spine and propensity for neck pain. However, a gap in the literature exists in which a method to describe coactivation during complex dynamic motions does not exist for the cervical spine. Methods: An electromyography-based coactivation index was developed for the cervical spine based on previously tested methodology used on the lumbar spine without a high-end model and tested using a series of different postures and speeds. Results: Complex motions involving twisting (i.e., flexion and twisting) and higher speed had higher magnitudes of coactivation than uniplanar motions in the sagittal or lateral plane, which was expected. The coupled motion of flexion and twisting showed four to five times higher coactivation than uniplanar (sagittal or lateral) movements. Conclusion: The coactivation index developed accommodates multiplanar, naturalistic movements. Testing of the index showed that motions requiring higher degrees of head control had higher effort due to coactivation, which was expected. Application: Overall, this coactivation index may be utilized to understand the neuromuscular effort of various tasks in the cervical spine.

KW - co-contraction

KW - coactivation

KW - neck muscles

KW - neuromuscular

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040826215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040826215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720817738598

DO - 10.1177/0018720817738598

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 68

EP - 79

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 1

ER -