An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry

Kenneth Voss, Scott Mclean, Marlon Lewis, Carol Johnson, Stephanie Flora, Michael Feinholz, Mark Yarbrough, Charles Trees, Mike Twardowski, Dennis Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vicarious calibration of ocean color satellites involves the use of accurate surface measurements of waterleaving radiance to update and improve the system calibration of ocean color satellite sensors. An experiment was performed to compare a free-fall technique with the established Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY) measurement. It was found in the laboratory that the radiance and irradiance instruments compared well within their estimated uncertainties for various spectral sources. The spectrally averaged differences between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) values for the sources and the instruments werew calculated from each instrument agreed in almost all cases within the combined instrument uncertainties (approximately 7%), there was a relative bias between the two instrument classes/techniques that varied spectrally. The spectrally averaged (400-600 nm) difference between the two instrument classes/techniques was 3.1%. However, the spectral variation resulted in the freefall instruments being 0.2% lower at 450 nm and 5.9% higher at 550 nm. Based on the analysis of one matchup, the bias in Lw was similar to that observed for Lu(1 m) with both systems, indicating the difference did not come from propagating Lu(1 m) to Lw.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1747-1759
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Volume27
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Radiometry
ocean color
radiance
Satellites
Calibration
Color
calibration
satellite sensor
Testing
irradiance
experiment
Experiments
Surface measurement
Light sources
Sensors
laboratory
analysis

Keywords

  • Buoy observations
  • In situ observations
  • Instrumentation/sensors
  • Optical properties
  • Radiances
  • Satellite observations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Ocean Engineering

Cite this

An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry. / Voss, Kenneth; Mclean, Scott; Lewis, Marlon; Johnson, Carol; Flora, Stephanie; Feinholz, Michael; Yarbrough, Mark; Trees, Charles; Twardowski, Mike; Clark, Dennis.

In: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 27, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 1747-1759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Voss, K, Mclean, S, Lewis, M, Johnson, C, Flora, S, Feinholz, M, Yarbrough, M, Trees, C, Twardowski, M & Clark, D 2010, 'An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry', Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1747-1759. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHO737.1
Voss, Kenneth ; Mclean, Scott ; Lewis, Marlon ; Johnson, Carol ; Flora, Stephanie ; Feinholz, Michael ; Yarbrough, Mark ; Trees, Charles ; Twardowski, Mike ; Clark, Dennis. / An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry. In: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 2010 ; Vol. 27, No. 10. pp. 1747-1759.
@article{231c7add7cad4d018eb633c8b23482a0,
title = "An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry",
abstract = "Vicarious calibration of ocean color satellites involves the use of accurate surface measurements of waterleaving radiance to update and improve the system calibration of ocean color satellite sensors. An experiment was performed to compare a free-fall technique with the established Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY) measurement. It was found in the laboratory that the radiance and irradiance instruments compared well within their estimated uncertainties for various spectral sources. The spectrally averaged differences between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) values for the sources and the instruments werew calculated from each instrument agreed in almost all cases within the combined instrument uncertainties (approximately 7{\%}), there was a relative bias between the two instrument classes/techniques that varied spectrally. The spectrally averaged (400-600 nm) difference between the two instrument classes/techniques was 3.1{\%}. However, the spectral variation resulted in the freefall instruments being 0.2{\%} lower at 450 nm and 5.9{\%} higher at 550 nm. Based on the analysis of one matchup, the bias in Lw was similar to that observed for Lu(1 m) with both systems, indicating the difference did not come from propagating Lu(1 m) to Lw.",
keywords = "Buoy observations, In situ observations, Instrumentation/sensors, Optical properties, Radiances, Satellite observations",
author = "Kenneth Voss and Scott Mclean and Marlon Lewis and Carol Johnson and Stephanie Flora and Michael Feinholz and Mark Yarbrough and Charles Trees and Mike Twardowski and Dennis Clark",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1175/2010JTECHO737.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1747--1759",
journal = "Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology",
issn = "0739-0572",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An example crossover experiment for testing new vicarious calibration techniques for satellite ocean color radiometry

AU - Voss, Kenneth

AU - Mclean, Scott

AU - Lewis, Marlon

AU - Johnson, Carol

AU - Flora, Stephanie

AU - Feinholz, Michael

AU - Yarbrough, Mark

AU - Trees, Charles

AU - Twardowski, Mike

AU - Clark, Dennis

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Vicarious calibration of ocean color satellites involves the use of accurate surface measurements of waterleaving radiance to update and improve the system calibration of ocean color satellite sensors. An experiment was performed to compare a free-fall technique with the established Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY) measurement. It was found in the laboratory that the radiance and irradiance instruments compared well within their estimated uncertainties for various spectral sources. The spectrally averaged differences between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) values for the sources and the instruments werew calculated from each instrument agreed in almost all cases within the combined instrument uncertainties (approximately 7%), there was a relative bias between the two instrument classes/techniques that varied spectrally. The spectrally averaged (400-600 nm) difference between the two instrument classes/techniques was 3.1%. However, the spectral variation resulted in the freefall instruments being 0.2% lower at 450 nm and 5.9% higher at 550 nm. Based on the analysis of one matchup, the bias in Lw was similar to that observed for Lu(1 m) with both systems, indicating the difference did not come from propagating Lu(1 m) to Lw.

AB - Vicarious calibration of ocean color satellites involves the use of accurate surface measurements of waterleaving radiance to update and improve the system calibration of ocean color satellite sensors. An experiment was performed to compare a free-fall technique with the established Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY) measurement. It was found in the laboratory that the radiance and irradiance instruments compared well within their estimated uncertainties for various spectral sources. The spectrally averaged differences between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) values for the sources and the instruments werew calculated from each instrument agreed in almost all cases within the combined instrument uncertainties (approximately 7%), there was a relative bias between the two instrument classes/techniques that varied spectrally. The spectrally averaged (400-600 nm) difference between the two instrument classes/techniques was 3.1%. However, the spectral variation resulted in the freefall instruments being 0.2% lower at 450 nm and 5.9% higher at 550 nm. Based on the analysis of one matchup, the bias in Lw was similar to that observed for Lu(1 m) with both systems, indicating the difference did not come from propagating Lu(1 m) to Lw.

KW - Buoy observations

KW - In situ observations

KW - Instrumentation/sensors

KW - Optical properties

KW - Radiances

KW - Satellite observations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958451201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958451201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2010JTECHO737.1

DO - 10.1175/2010JTECHO737.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77958451201

VL - 27

SP - 1747

EP - 1759

JO - Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

JF - Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

SN - 0739-0572

IS - 10

ER -