An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the coaching efficacy scale for coaches from the United States of America

Nicholas Myers, Edward W. Wolfe, Deborah L. Feltz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study extends validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale (CES; Feltz, Chase, Moritz, & Sullivan, 1999) by providing an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument from previously collected data on high school and college coaches from United States. Data were fitted to a multidimensional item response theory model. Results offered some supporting evidence concerning validity based on the fit of a multidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., motivation, game strategy, technique, and character building) as compared to a unidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., total coaching efficacy), the fit of the majority of items to the measurement model, the internal consistency of coaching efficacy estimates, and the precision of total coaching efficacy estimates. However, concerns exist relating to the rating scale structure, the precision of multidimensional coaching efficacy estimates, and misfit of a couple of items to the measurement model. Practical recommendations for both future research with the CES and for the development of a revised instrument are forwarded.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-160
Number of pages26
JournalMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Mentoring
Motivation

Keywords

  • Coaching efficacy
  • Multidimensional item response theory
  • Rasch model
  • Self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the coaching efficacy scale for coaches from the United States of America. / Myers, Nicholas; Wolfe, Edward W.; Feltz, Deborah L.

In: Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.09.2005, p. 135-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{75f42c3cce8148b49e3aee044c214ae2,
title = "An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the coaching efficacy scale for coaches from the United States of America",
abstract = "This study extends validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale (CES; Feltz, Chase, Moritz, & Sullivan, 1999) by providing an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument from previously collected data on high school and college coaches from United States. Data were fitted to a multidimensional item response theory model. Results offered some supporting evidence concerning validity based on the fit of a multidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., motivation, game strategy, technique, and character building) as compared to a unidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., total coaching efficacy), the fit of the majority of items to the measurement model, the internal consistency of coaching efficacy estimates, and the precision of total coaching efficacy estimates. However, concerns exist relating to the rating scale structure, the precision of multidimensional coaching efficacy estimates, and misfit of a couple of items to the measurement model. Practical recommendations for both future research with the CES and for the development of a revised instrument are forwarded.",
keywords = "Coaching efficacy, Multidimensional item response theory, Rasch model, Self-efficacy",
author = "Nicholas Myers and Wolfe, {Edward W.} and Feltz, {Deborah L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "135--160",
journal = "Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science",
issn = "1091-367X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the coaching efficacy scale for coaches from the United States of America

AU - Myers, Nicholas

AU - Wolfe, Edward W.

AU - Feltz, Deborah L.

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - This study extends validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale (CES; Feltz, Chase, Moritz, & Sullivan, 1999) by providing an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument from previously collected data on high school and college coaches from United States. Data were fitted to a multidimensional item response theory model. Results offered some supporting evidence concerning validity based on the fit of a multidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., motivation, game strategy, technique, and character building) as compared to a unidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., total coaching efficacy), the fit of the majority of items to the measurement model, the internal consistency of coaching efficacy estimates, and the precision of total coaching efficacy estimates. However, concerns exist relating to the rating scale structure, the precision of multidimensional coaching efficacy estimates, and misfit of a couple of items to the measurement model. Practical recommendations for both future research with the CES and for the development of a revised instrument are forwarded.

AB - This study extends validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale (CES; Feltz, Chase, Moritz, & Sullivan, 1999) by providing an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument from previously collected data on high school and college coaches from United States. Data were fitted to a multidimensional item response theory model. Results offered some supporting evidence concerning validity based on the fit of a multidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., motivation, game strategy, technique, and character building) as compared to a unidimensional conceptualization of coaching efficacy (i.e., total coaching efficacy), the fit of the majority of items to the measurement model, the internal consistency of coaching efficacy estimates, and the precision of total coaching efficacy estimates. However, concerns exist relating to the rating scale structure, the precision of multidimensional coaching efficacy estimates, and misfit of a couple of items to the measurement model. Practical recommendations for both future research with the CES and for the development of a revised instrument are forwarded.

KW - Coaching efficacy

KW - Multidimensional item response theory

KW - Rasch model

KW - Self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944509350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944509350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_1

DO - 10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23944509350

VL - 9

SP - 135

EP - 160

JO - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

JF - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

SN - 1091-367X

IS - 3

ER -