An energy performance study of several factors in air economizers with low-limit space humidity

Gang Wang, Li Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most air handling units in commercial buildings adopt an air-side economizer for free cooling when the outside air is cool. Since the outside air may be dry during the economizer operations, humidification is needed for special applications where stringent space humidity controls are required. Therefore, the economizer saves cooling energy but may lose space humidity control or require additional energy for humidification. A humidification energy penalty or loss of space humidity control may prevent or reduce air-side economizer usage. The barrier comes from the lack of systematic energy analysis on an economizer operation with a humidification process. In this paper, optimal economizer operation zones are simulated to minimize the total cost of mechanical cooling and humidification and an experiment is conducted to validate the energy savings. The results reveal that the significant energy benefits (up to 9.3 kW/(m3/s) or15 Btu/h-CFM) exist by using air economizers while the space low-limit space humidity is maintained. However, the energy benefits heavily depend on humidification cost and required low-limit space humidity. For the low-limit space relative humidity of 30% in a moderate weather, the energy performance of regular economizer excels non-economizer when the cooling price is twice of the humidification price or lower.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-455
Number of pages9
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume64
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 24 2013

Fingerprint

Economizers
Atmospheric humidity
Humidity control
Air
Cooling
Costs
Energy conservation

Keywords

  • Air handling unit
  • Control
  • Energy efficiency
  • Free cooling
  • Optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

An energy performance study of several factors in air economizers with low-limit space humidity. / Wang, Gang; Song, Li.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 64, 24.06.2013, p. 447-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e7f95f1e334424198142feedc0492e4,
title = "An energy performance study of several factors in air economizers with low-limit space humidity",
abstract = "Most air handling units in commercial buildings adopt an air-side economizer for free cooling when the outside air is cool. Since the outside air may be dry during the economizer operations, humidification is needed for special applications where stringent space humidity controls are required. Therefore, the economizer saves cooling energy but may lose space humidity control or require additional energy for humidification. A humidification energy penalty or loss of space humidity control may prevent or reduce air-side economizer usage. The barrier comes from the lack of systematic energy analysis on an economizer operation with a humidification process. In this paper, optimal economizer operation zones are simulated to minimize the total cost of mechanical cooling and humidification and an experiment is conducted to validate the energy savings. The results reveal that the significant energy benefits (up to 9.3 kW/(m3/s) or15 Btu/h-CFM) exist by using air economizers while the space low-limit space humidity is maintained. However, the energy benefits heavily depend on humidification cost and required low-limit space humidity. For the low-limit space relative humidity of 30{\%} in a moderate weather, the energy performance of regular economizer excels non-economizer when the cooling price is twice of the humidification price or lower.",
keywords = "Air handling unit, Control, Energy efficiency, Free cooling, Optimization",
author = "Gang Wang and Li Song",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.025",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "447--455",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An energy performance study of several factors in air economizers with low-limit space humidity

AU - Wang, Gang

AU - Song, Li

PY - 2013/6/24

Y1 - 2013/6/24

N2 - Most air handling units in commercial buildings adopt an air-side economizer for free cooling when the outside air is cool. Since the outside air may be dry during the economizer operations, humidification is needed for special applications where stringent space humidity controls are required. Therefore, the economizer saves cooling energy but may lose space humidity control or require additional energy for humidification. A humidification energy penalty or loss of space humidity control may prevent or reduce air-side economizer usage. The barrier comes from the lack of systematic energy analysis on an economizer operation with a humidification process. In this paper, optimal economizer operation zones are simulated to minimize the total cost of mechanical cooling and humidification and an experiment is conducted to validate the energy savings. The results reveal that the significant energy benefits (up to 9.3 kW/(m3/s) or15 Btu/h-CFM) exist by using air economizers while the space low-limit space humidity is maintained. However, the energy benefits heavily depend on humidification cost and required low-limit space humidity. For the low-limit space relative humidity of 30% in a moderate weather, the energy performance of regular economizer excels non-economizer when the cooling price is twice of the humidification price or lower.

AB - Most air handling units in commercial buildings adopt an air-side economizer for free cooling when the outside air is cool. Since the outside air may be dry during the economizer operations, humidification is needed for special applications where stringent space humidity controls are required. Therefore, the economizer saves cooling energy but may lose space humidity control or require additional energy for humidification. A humidification energy penalty or loss of space humidity control may prevent or reduce air-side economizer usage. The barrier comes from the lack of systematic energy analysis on an economizer operation with a humidification process. In this paper, optimal economizer operation zones are simulated to minimize the total cost of mechanical cooling and humidification and an experiment is conducted to validate the energy savings. The results reveal that the significant energy benefits (up to 9.3 kW/(m3/s) or15 Btu/h-CFM) exist by using air economizers while the space low-limit space humidity is maintained. However, the energy benefits heavily depend on humidification cost and required low-limit space humidity. For the low-limit space relative humidity of 30% in a moderate weather, the energy performance of regular economizer excels non-economizer when the cooling price is twice of the humidification price or lower.

KW - Air handling unit

KW - Control

KW - Energy efficiency

KW - Free cooling

KW - Optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879120626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879120626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.025

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.025

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 447

EP - 455

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

ER -