An easy road to nominalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I provide an easy road to nominalism which does not rely on a Field-type nominalization strategy for mathematics (Field 1980). According to this proposal, applications of mathematics to science, and alleged mathematical explanations of physical phenomena, only emerge when suitable physical interpretations of the mathematical formalism are advanced. And since these interpretations are rarely distinguished from the mathematical formalism, the impression arises that mathematical explanations derive from the mathematical formalism alone. I correct this misimpression by pointing out, in the cases recently discussed by Mark Colyvan (2010), exactly where the interpretations of the formalism were invoked and the function they played in the resulting explanations. A viable form of easy-road nominalism, which is also sensitive to scientific practice, then arises.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)967-982
Number of pages16
JournalMind
Volume121
Issue number484
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Nominalism
Formalism
Physical
Mathematics
Roads
Nominalization
Scientific Practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

An easy road to nominalism. / Bueno, Otavio.

In: Mind, Vol. 121, No. 484, 10.2012, p. 967-982.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bueno, Otavio. / An easy road to nominalism. In: Mind. 2012 ; Vol. 121, No. 484. pp. 967-982.
@article{80808d98284d485fb7076a6db8448ad8,
title = "An easy road to nominalism",
abstract = "In this paper, I provide an easy road to nominalism which does not rely on a Field-type nominalization strategy for mathematics (Field 1980). According to this proposal, applications of mathematics to science, and alleged mathematical explanations of physical phenomena, only emerge when suitable physical interpretations of the mathematical formalism are advanced. And since these interpretations are rarely distinguished from the mathematical formalism, the impression arises that mathematical explanations derive from the mathematical formalism alone. I correct this misimpression by pointing out, in the cases recently discussed by Mark Colyvan (2010), exactly where the interpretations of the formalism were invoked and the function they played in the resulting explanations. A viable form of easy-road nominalism, which is also sensitive to scientific practice, then arises.",
author = "Otavio Bueno",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/mind/fzs114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "967--982",
journal = "Mind",
issn = "0026-4423",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "484",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An easy road to nominalism

AU - Bueno, Otavio

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - In this paper, I provide an easy road to nominalism which does not rely on a Field-type nominalization strategy for mathematics (Field 1980). According to this proposal, applications of mathematics to science, and alleged mathematical explanations of physical phenomena, only emerge when suitable physical interpretations of the mathematical formalism are advanced. And since these interpretations are rarely distinguished from the mathematical formalism, the impression arises that mathematical explanations derive from the mathematical formalism alone. I correct this misimpression by pointing out, in the cases recently discussed by Mark Colyvan (2010), exactly where the interpretations of the formalism were invoked and the function they played in the resulting explanations. A viable form of easy-road nominalism, which is also sensitive to scientific practice, then arises.

AB - In this paper, I provide an easy road to nominalism which does not rely on a Field-type nominalization strategy for mathematics (Field 1980). According to this proposal, applications of mathematics to science, and alleged mathematical explanations of physical phenomena, only emerge when suitable physical interpretations of the mathematical formalism are advanced. And since these interpretations are rarely distinguished from the mathematical formalism, the impression arises that mathematical explanations derive from the mathematical formalism alone. I correct this misimpression by pointing out, in the cases recently discussed by Mark Colyvan (2010), exactly where the interpretations of the formalism were invoked and the function they played in the resulting explanations. A viable form of easy-road nominalism, which is also sensitive to scientific practice, then arises.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880561202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880561202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mind/fzs114

DO - 10.1093/mind/fzs114

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880561202

VL - 121

SP - 967

EP - 982

JO - Mind

JF - Mind

SN - 0026-4423

IS - 484

ER -