Altruism in viscous populations revisited: Competition and altruism do not exactly cancel even in the island model

Michael C. Whitlock, James Van Dyken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Hamilton suggested that cooperation would evolve most readily in viscous (low dispersal) populations, because nearby individuals would have high genetic relatedness. However, Taylor (1992) found that the indirect fitness gains achieved by cooperation with relatives is exactly offset by local competition, preventing true altruism from evolving no matter the degree of relatedness or population viscosity. Question: Does local density regulation exactly cancel the indirect fitness benefits of altruism in Taylor's model? Mathematical method: Inclusive fitness theory following the derivation of Taylor (1992). Key assumptions: Relatedness depends on the effective deme size, N e, but the distribution of fitness benefits depends on its census size, N. Conclusions: For Taylor's model, the exact cancellation of the indirect fitness benefits of altruism by local competition requires the special case where Ne = N, a condition not often observed in nature. Even in Taylor's model, the benefits of altruism depend on relatedness, rather than just direct benefits. When Ne ≤ N, as is commonly observed, true altruism can evolve, and it is more likely to do so when populations are more viscous. Local competition is important, but it requires restrictive conditions to exactly negate the effects of cooperation among relatives in a viscous population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)747-752
Number of pages6
JournalEvolutionary Ecology Research
Volume13
Issue number7
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

altruism
relatedness
fitness
inclusive fitness
numerical method
genetic relationships
census
viscosity
co-operation

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Competition
  • Cooperation
  • Inclusive fitness
  • Island model
  • Viscosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Altruism in viscous populations revisited : Competition and altruism do not exactly cancel even in the island model. / Whitlock, Michael C.; Van Dyken, James.

In: Evolutionary Ecology Research, Vol. 13, No. 7, 10.2011, p. 747-752.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24a4324a0ec446ba9b160da3e800ee35,
title = "Altruism in viscous populations revisited: Competition and altruism do not exactly cancel even in the island model",
abstract = "Background: Hamilton suggested that cooperation would evolve most readily in viscous (low dispersal) populations, because nearby individuals would have high genetic relatedness. However, Taylor (1992) found that the indirect fitness gains achieved by cooperation with relatives is exactly offset by local competition, preventing true altruism from evolving no matter the degree of relatedness or population viscosity. Question: Does local density regulation exactly cancel the indirect fitness benefits of altruism in Taylor's model? Mathematical method: Inclusive fitness theory following the derivation of Taylor (1992). Key assumptions: Relatedness depends on the effective deme size, N e, but the distribution of fitness benefits depends on its census size, N. Conclusions: For Taylor's model, the exact cancellation of the indirect fitness benefits of altruism by local competition requires the special case where Ne = N, a condition not often observed in nature. Even in Taylor's model, the benefits of altruism depend on relatedness, rather than just direct benefits. When Ne ≤ N, as is commonly observed, true altruism can evolve, and it is more likely to do so when populations are more viscous. Local competition is important, but it requires restrictive conditions to exactly negate the effects of cooperation among relatives in a viscous population.",
keywords = "Altruism, Competition, Cooperation, Inclusive fitness, Island model, Viscosity",
author = "Whitlock, {Michael C.} and {Van Dyken}, James",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "747--752",
journal = "Evolutionary Ecology Research",
issn = "1522-0613",
publisher = "Evolutionary Ecology Research",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Altruism in viscous populations revisited

T2 - Competition and altruism do not exactly cancel even in the island model

AU - Whitlock, Michael C.

AU - Van Dyken, James

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Background: Hamilton suggested that cooperation would evolve most readily in viscous (low dispersal) populations, because nearby individuals would have high genetic relatedness. However, Taylor (1992) found that the indirect fitness gains achieved by cooperation with relatives is exactly offset by local competition, preventing true altruism from evolving no matter the degree of relatedness or population viscosity. Question: Does local density regulation exactly cancel the indirect fitness benefits of altruism in Taylor's model? Mathematical method: Inclusive fitness theory following the derivation of Taylor (1992). Key assumptions: Relatedness depends on the effective deme size, N e, but the distribution of fitness benefits depends on its census size, N. Conclusions: For Taylor's model, the exact cancellation of the indirect fitness benefits of altruism by local competition requires the special case where Ne = N, a condition not often observed in nature. Even in Taylor's model, the benefits of altruism depend on relatedness, rather than just direct benefits. When Ne ≤ N, as is commonly observed, true altruism can evolve, and it is more likely to do so when populations are more viscous. Local competition is important, but it requires restrictive conditions to exactly negate the effects of cooperation among relatives in a viscous population.

AB - Background: Hamilton suggested that cooperation would evolve most readily in viscous (low dispersal) populations, because nearby individuals would have high genetic relatedness. However, Taylor (1992) found that the indirect fitness gains achieved by cooperation with relatives is exactly offset by local competition, preventing true altruism from evolving no matter the degree of relatedness or population viscosity. Question: Does local density regulation exactly cancel the indirect fitness benefits of altruism in Taylor's model? Mathematical method: Inclusive fitness theory following the derivation of Taylor (1992). Key assumptions: Relatedness depends on the effective deme size, N e, but the distribution of fitness benefits depends on its census size, N. Conclusions: For Taylor's model, the exact cancellation of the indirect fitness benefits of altruism by local competition requires the special case where Ne = N, a condition not often observed in nature. Even in Taylor's model, the benefits of altruism depend on relatedness, rather than just direct benefits. When Ne ≤ N, as is commonly observed, true altruism can evolve, and it is more likely to do so when populations are more viscous. Local competition is important, but it requires restrictive conditions to exactly negate the effects of cooperation among relatives in a viscous population.

KW - Altruism

KW - Competition

KW - Cooperation

KW - Inclusive fitness

KW - Island model

KW - Viscosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861433829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861433829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861433829

VL - 13

SP - 747

EP - 752

JO - Evolutionary Ecology Research

JF - Evolutionary Ecology Research

SN - 1522-0613

IS - 7

ER -