Agreement between company-recorded and self-reported estimates of duration and frequency of occupational fumigant exposure

Geoffrey M. Calvert, Charles A. Mueller, Virginia L. O'Neill, John M. Fajen, Thomas Briggle, Lora E. Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigators must often rely on self-reported work history information collected with questionnaires. However, little is known about the agreement between self-reported estimates of exposure and records kept by companies. As part of a cross-sectional medical study of structural fumigation workers, self-reported work history information was collected on both duration and frequency of exposure using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. All company records available on these workers were also collected. Only 15 of 81 structural fumigation companies identified by study participants as current or past structural fumigation employers had records suitable for comparison. These 15 companies employed 32 of the workers who participated in the cross- sectional medical study. The exposure information provided by the 32 workers was compared to information obtained from company records. By examining the agreement between these two data sources, potential limitations were identified in both the self-reported and company-recorded exposure data. By recognizing these limitations in the exposure data, we identified the most appropriate exposure measures to be used in subsequent data analyses. This exercise also demonstrated the difficulties in undertaking these exposure comparisons in an industry consisting of many small, independent companies. Similar difficulties with assessing exposures may be experienced by investigators studying other service industries consisting of many small, independent companies (e.g., dry cleaning, auto repair).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)364-368
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fumigation
Occupational Exposure
Industry
Cross-Sectional Studies
History
Research Personnel
Information Storage and Retrieval
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Data agreement
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Fumigation
  • Occupational exposure estimation
  • Pesticides, occupational health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Agreement between company-recorded and self-reported estimates of duration and frequency of occupational fumigant exposure. / Calvert, Geoffrey M.; Mueller, Charles A.; O'Neill, Virginia L.; Fajen, John M.; Briggle, Thomas; Fleming, Lora E.

In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.10.1997, p. 364-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Calvert, Geoffrey M. ; Mueller, Charles A. ; O'Neill, Virginia L. ; Fajen, John M. ; Briggle, Thomas ; Fleming, Lora E. / Agreement between company-recorded and self-reported estimates of duration and frequency of occupational fumigant exposure. In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 364-368.
@article{8a10b940deb7411e95c5d44a7af0f790,
title = "Agreement between company-recorded and self-reported estimates of duration and frequency of occupational fumigant exposure",
abstract = "Investigators must often rely on self-reported work history information collected with questionnaires. However, little is known about the agreement between self-reported estimates of exposure and records kept by companies. As part of a cross-sectional medical study of structural fumigation workers, self-reported work history information was collected on both duration and frequency of exposure using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. All company records available on these workers were also collected. Only 15 of 81 structural fumigation companies identified by study participants as current or past structural fumigation employers had records suitable for comparison. These 15 companies employed 32 of the workers who participated in the cross- sectional medical study. The exposure information provided by the 32 workers was compared to information obtained from company records. By examining the agreement between these two data sources, potential limitations were identified in both the self-reported and company-recorded exposure data. By recognizing these limitations in the exposure data, we identified the most appropriate exposure measures to be used in subsequent data analyses. This exercise also demonstrated the difficulties in undertaking these exposure comparisons in an industry consisting of many small, independent companies. Similar difficulties with assessing exposures may be experienced by investigators studying other service industries consisting of many small, independent companies (e.g., dry cleaning, auto repair).",
keywords = "Data agreement, Epidemiologic methods, Fumigation, Occupational exposure estimation, Pesticides, occupational health",
author = "Calvert, {Geoffrey M.} and Mueller, {Charles A.} and O'Neill, {Virginia L.} and Fajen, {John M.} and Thomas Briggle and Fleming, {Lora E.}",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199710)32:4<364::AID-AJIM7>3.0.CO;2-U",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "364--368",
journal = "American Journal of Industrial Medicine",
issn = "0271-3586",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between company-recorded and self-reported estimates of duration and frequency of occupational fumigant exposure

AU - Calvert, Geoffrey M.

AU - Mueller, Charles A.

AU - O'Neill, Virginia L.

AU - Fajen, John M.

AU - Briggle, Thomas

AU - Fleming, Lora E.

PY - 1997/10/1

Y1 - 1997/10/1

N2 - Investigators must often rely on self-reported work history information collected with questionnaires. However, little is known about the agreement between self-reported estimates of exposure and records kept by companies. As part of a cross-sectional medical study of structural fumigation workers, self-reported work history information was collected on both duration and frequency of exposure using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. All company records available on these workers were also collected. Only 15 of 81 structural fumigation companies identified by study participants as current or past structural fumigation employers had records suitable for comparison. These 15 companies employed 32 of the workers who participated in the cross- sectional medical study. The exposure information provided by the 32 workers was compared to information obtained from company records. By examining the agreement between these two data sources, potential limitations were identified in both the self-reported and company-recorded exposure data. By recognizing these limitations in the exposure data, we identified the most appropriate exposure measures to be used in subsequent data analyses. This exercise also demonstrated the difficulties in undertaking these exposure comparisons in an industry consisting of many small, independent companies. Similar difficulties with assessing exposures may be experienced by investigators studying other service industries consisting of many small, independent companies (e.g., dry cleaning, auto repair).

AB - Investigators must often rely on self-reported work history information collected with questionnaires. However, little is known about the agreement between self-reported estimates of exposure and records kept by companies. As part of a cross-sectional medical study of structural fumigation workers, self-reported work history information was collected on both duration and frequency of exposure using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. All company records available on these workers were also collected. Only 15 of 81 structural fumigation companies identified by study participants as current or past structural fumigation employers had records suitable for comparison. These 15 companies employed 32 of the workers who participated in the cross- sectional medical study. The exposure information provided by the 32 workers was compared to information obtained from company records. By examining the agreement between these two data sources, potential limitations were identified in both the self-reported and company-recorded exposure data. By recognizing these limitations in the exposure data, we identified the most appropriate exposure measures to be used in subsequent data analyses. This exercise also demonstrated the difficulties in undertaking these exposure comparisons in an industry consisting of many small, independent companies. Similar difficulties with assessing exposures may be experienced by investigators studying other service industries consisting of many small, independent companies (e.g., dry cleaning, auto repair).

KW - Data agreement

KW - Epidemiologic methods

KW - Fumigation

KW - Occupational exposure estimation

KW - Pesticides, occupational health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030789948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030789948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199710)32:4<364::AID-AJIM7>3.0.CO;2-U

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199710)32:4<364::AID-AJIM7>3.0.CO;2-U

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 364

EP - 368

JO - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

JF - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

SN - 0271-3586

IS - 4

ER -