Against the grain: Agricultural trade policies of the US, the European Community and Japan at the GATT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

US, European Community and Japanese agricultural trade policies are examined from an institutional framework, which positions the state at the center of analysis, as mediator of the global economy and domestic politics. My argument is that there is a similarity between the farm trade policies of many industrial states. Evidence from traditional measures of openness such as tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as producer subsidies paid to farmers supports this reasoning. In addition to strong state involvement in the agricultural arena, the persistence of the 'agrarian myth' and similarities in the institutional policy process are found across states. The conclusion drawn is that the role of the state is very important in agricultural policy-making, and it is premature to discuss a transnational state in the agricultural arena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-262
Number of pages16
JournalPolitical Geography
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

agricultural trade
GATT
trade policy
European Community
agricultural product
European Union
Japan
national politics
institutional framework
global economy
agricultural policy
policy making
subsidy
persistence
myth
producer
farm
farmer
economy
politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Against the grain : Agricultural trade policies of the US, the European Community and Japan at the GATT. / Grant, Richard.

In: Political Geography, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1993, p. 247-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc061bcaa70445f69231d30eb17e356d,
title = "Against the grain: Agricultural trade policies of the US, the European Community and Japan at the GATT",
abstract = "US, European Community and Japanese agricultural trade policies are examined from an institutional framework, which positions the state at the center of analysis, as mediator of the global economy and domestic politics. My argument is that there is a similarity between the farm trade policies of many industrial states. Evidence from traditional measures of openness such as tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as producer subsidies paid to farmers supports this reasoning. In addition to strong state involvement in the agricultural arena, the persistence of the 'agrarian myth' and similarities in the institutional policy process are found across states. The conclusion drawn is that the role of the state is very important in agricultural policy-making, and it is premature to discuss a transnational state in the agricultural arena.",
author = "Richard Grant",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0962-6298(93)90056-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "247--262",
journal = "Political Geography",
issn = "0962-6298",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Against the grain

T2 - Agricultural trade policies of the US, the European Community and Japan at the GATT

AU - Grant, Richard

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - US, European Community and Japanese agricultural trade policies are examined from an institutional framework, which positions the state at the center of analysis, as mediator of the global economy and domestic politics. My argument is that there is a similarity between the farm trade policies of many industrial states. Evidence from traditional measures of openness such as tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as producer subsidies paid to farmers supports this reasoning. In addition to strong state involvement in the agricultural arena, the persistence of the 'agrarian myth' and similarities in the institutional policy process are found across states. The conclusion drawn is that the role of the state is very important in agricultural policy-making, and it is premature to discuss a transnational state in the agricultural arena.

AB - US, European Community and Japanese agricultural trade policies are examined from an institutional framework, which positions the state at the center of analysis, as mediator of the global economy and domestic politics. My argument is that there is a similarity between the farm trade policies of many industrial states. Evidence from traditional measures of openness such as tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as producer subsidies paid to farmers supports this reasoning. In addition to strong state involvement in the agricultural arena, the persistence of the 'agrarian myth' and similarities in the institutional policy process are found across states. The conclusion drawn is that the role of the state is very important in agricultural policy-making, and it is premature to discuss a transnational state in the agricultural arena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027713459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027713459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0962-6298(93)90056-D

DO - 10.1016/0962-6298(93)90056-D

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027713459

VL - 12

SP - 247

EP - 262

JO - Political Geography

JF - Political Geography

SN - 0962-6298

IS - 3

ER -