Abstract
Discussions of the dimensional structure of affect usually are based on results of factor analyses. Disagreements focus largely on issues of measurement and measurement error, I argue that the structure of affect is not discussed meaningfully without considering functional implications of affects. A functional analysis is outlined in which approach and incentive-related affects (both positive and negative) are managed by I self-regulatory system, and avoidance and threat-related affects (positive and negative) are managed by another self-regulatory system. In both cases, positive and negative affects are posited to convey information about whether the behavior being engaged in is going well or poorly. This view argues for the existence of 2 bipolar affective dimensions, the properties of which are informed by an understanding of both behavior and feelings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 345-356 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Personality and Social Psychology Review |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2001 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Social Psychology
Cite this
Affect and the functional bases of behavior : On the dimensional structure of affective experience. / Carver, Charles S.
In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.12.2001, p. 345-356.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Affect and the functional bases of behavior
T2 - On the dimensional structure of affective experience
AU - Carver, Charles S
PY - 2001/12/1
Y1 - 2001/12/1
N2 - Discussions of the dimensional structure of affect usually are based on results of factor analyses. Disagreements focus largely on issues of measurement and measurement error, I argue that the structure of affect is not discussed meaningfully without considering functional implications of affects. A functional analysis is outlined in which approach and incentive-related affects (both positive and negative) are managed by I self-regulatory system, and avoidance and threat-related affects (positive and negative) are managed by another self-regulatory system. In both cases, positive and negative affects are posited to convey information about whether the behavior being engaged in is going well or poorly. This view argues for the existence of 2 bipolar affective dimensions, the properties of which are informed by an understanding of both behavior and feelings.
AB - Discussions of the dimensional structure of affect usually are based on results of factor analyses. Disagreements focus largely on issues of measurement and measurement error, I argue that the structure of affect is not discussed meaningfully without considering functional implications of affects. A functional analysis is outlined in which approach and incentive-related affects (both positive and negative) are managed by I self-regulatory system, and avoidance and threat-related affects (positive and negative) are managed by another self-regulatory system. In both cases, positive and negative affects are posited to convey information about whether the behavior being engaged in is going well or poorly. This view argues for the existence of 2 bipolar affective dimensions, the properties of which are informed by an understanding of both behavior and feelings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035537631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035537631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035537631
VL - 5
SP - 345
EP - 356
JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review
JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review
SN - 1088-8683
IS - 4
ER -