Affect and cognition in party identification

Barry C. Burden, Casey A Klofstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the centrality of party identification in understandings of political behavior in the United States, there is an unacknowledged disparity between our theories and measurement of the phenomenon. The traditional method of measuring party identification relies on supplying cognitive cues by explicitly asking respondents to "think" about their partisanship. The Michigan theory of party identification, in contrast, assumes that partisanship is primarily affective. Using a survey experiment, we explore the effects of asking respondents to feel rather than think about their party identification. The new questions reveal that the electorate is more Republican than previously thought. Response timers show that respondents take longer to answer the new items, suggesting that they are surveying a wider and deeper array of considerations. These results serve to revive many of our traditional conceptions of how party identity works while also opening the door for new research questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)869-886
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Cognition
cognition
political behavior
Cues
Surveys and Questionnaires
experiment
Research
Partisanship

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Cognition
  • Party identification
  • Response times
  • Survey experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Affect and cognition in party identification. / Burden, Barry C.; Klofstad, Casey A.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 869-886.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burden, Barry C. ; Klofstad, Casey A. / Affect and cognition in party identification. In: Political Psychology. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 869-886.
@article{a1d5f8d3b49644e1a084f8479464cf06,
title = "Affect and cognition in party identification",
abstract = "Despite the centrality of party identification in understandings of political behavior in the United States, there is an unacknowledged disparity between our theories and measurement of the phenomenon. The traditional method of measuring party identification relies on supplying cognitive cues by explicitly asking respondents to {"}think{"} about their partisanship. The Michigan theory of party identification, in contrast, assumes that partisanship is primarily affective. Using a survey experiment, we explore the effects of asking respondents to feel rather than think about their party identification. The new questions reveal that the electorate is more Republican than previously thought. Response timers show that respondents take longer to answer the new items, suggesting that they are surveying a wider and deeper array of considerations. These results serve to revive many of our traditional conceptions of how party identity works while also opening the door for new research questions.",
keywords = "Affect, Cognition, Party identification, Response times, Survey experiment",
author = "Burden, {Barry C.} and Klofstad, {Casey A}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00448.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "869--886",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affect and cognition in party identification

AU - Burden, Barry C.

AU - Klofstad, Casey A

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Despite the centrality of party identification in understandings of political behavior in the United States, there is an unacknowledged disparity between our theories and measurement of the phenomenon. The traditional method of measuring party identification relies on supplying cognitive cues by explicitly asking respondents to "think" about their partisanship. The Michigan theory of party identification, in contrast, assumes that partisanship is primarily affective. Using a survey experiment, we explore the effects of asking respondents to feel rather than think about their party identification. The new questions reveal that the electorate is more Republican than previously thought. Response timers show that respondents take longer to answer the new items, suggesting that they are surveying a wider and deeper array of considerations. These results serve to revive many of our traditional conceptions of how party identity works while also opening the door for new research questions.

AB - Despite the centrality of party identification in understandings of political behavior in the United States, there is an unacknowledged disparity between our theories and measurement of the phenomenon. The traditional method of measuring party identification relies on supplying cognitive cues by explicitly asking respondents to "think" about their partisanship. The Michigan theory of party identification, in contrast, assumes that partisanship is primarily affective. Using a survey experiment, we explore the effects of asking respondents to feel rather than think about their party identification. The new questions reveal that the electorate is more Republican than previously thought. Response timers show that respondents take longer to answer the new items, suggesting that they are surveying a wider and deeper array of considerations. These results serve to revive many of our traditional conceptions of how party identity works while also opening the door for new research questions.

KW - Affect

KW - Cognition

KW - Party identification

KW - Response times

KW - Survey experiment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29444445657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29444445657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00448.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00448.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:29444445657

VL - 26

SP - 869

EP - 886

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 6

ER -