Adolescent Standardized Patients: Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks

Mark Hanson, Richard Tiberius, Brian Hodges, Sherri MacKay, Nancy McNaughton, Susan Dickens, Glenn Regehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our psychiatric Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) group wishes to develop adolescent psychiatry OSCE stations. The literature regarding adolescent standardized patient (SP) selection methods and simulation effects, however, offered limited assurance that such adolescents would not experience adverse simulation effects. Purpose: Evaluation of adolescent SP selection methods and simulation effects for low- and high-stress roles. Method: A two-component (employment-psychological) SP selection method was used. Carefully selected SPs were assigned across three conditions: low-stress medical role, high-stress psychosocial role, and wait list control. Qualitative and quantitative measures were used to assess simulation effects. Results: Our selection method excluded 21% (7% employment and 14% psychological) of SP applicants. For SP participants, beneficial effects included acquisition of job skills and satisfaction in making an important contribution to society. SP reactions of discomfort to roles were reported. Long-term adverse effects were not identified. Conclusions: A two-component adolescent SP selection method is recommended. Adolescent SP benefits outweigh risks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-113
Number of pages10
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Selection
adolescent
Patient Simulation
simulation
Psychology
Adolescent Psychiatry
examination
Job Satisfaction
applicant
psychiatry
Psychiatry
evaluation
experience
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Hanson, M., Tiberius, R., Hodges, B., MacKay, S., McNaughton, N., Dickens, S., & Regehr, G. (2002). Adolescent Standardized Patients: Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14(2), 104-113.

Adolescent Standardized Patients : Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks. / Hanson, Mark; Tiberius, Richard; Hodges, Brian; MacKay, Sherri; McNaughton, Nancy; Dickens, Susan; Regehr, Glenn.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.03.2002, p. 104-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hanson, M, Tiberius, R, Hodges, B, MacKay, S, McNaughton, N, Dickens, S & Regehr, G 2002, 'Adolescent Standardized Patients: Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks', Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 104-113.
Hanson M, Tiberius R, Hodges B, MacKay S, McNaughton N, Dickens S et al. Adolescent Standardized Patients: Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2002 Mar 1;14(2):104-113.
Hanson, Mark ; Tiberius, Richard ; Hodges, Brian ; MacKay, Sherri ; McNaughton, Nancy ; Dickens, Susan ; Regehr, Glenn. / Adolescent Standardized Patients : Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks. In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 104-113.
@article{a26de5a2f6334fe09d3f19bc7c919d24,
title = "Adolescent Standardized Patients: Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks",
abstract = "Background: Our psychiatric Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) group wishes to develop adolescent psychiatry OSCE stations. The literature regarding adolescent standardized patient (SP) selection methods and simulation effects, however, offered limited assurance that such adolescents would not experience adverse simulation effects. Purpose: Evaluation of adolescent SP selection methods and simulation effects for low- and high-stress roles. Method: A two-component (employment-psychological) SP selection method was used. Carefully selected SPs were assigned across three conditions: low-stress medical role, high-stress psychosocial role, and wait list control. Qualitative and quantitative measures were used to assess simulation effects. Results: Our selection method excluded 21{\%} (7{\%} employment and 14{\%} psychological) of SP applicants. For SP participants, beneficial effects included acquisition of job skills and satisfaction in making an important contribution to society. SP reactions of discomfort to roles were reported. Long-term adverse effects were not identified. Conclusions: A two-component adolescent SP selection method is recommended. Adolescent SP benefits outweigh risks.",
author = "Mark Hanson and Richard Tiberius and Brian Hodges and Sherri MacKay and Nancy McNaughton and Susan Dickens and Glenn Regehr",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "104--113",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adolescent Standardized Patients

T2 - Method of Selection and Assessment of Benefits and Risks

AU - Hanson, Mark

AU - Tiberius, Richard

AU - Hodges, Brian

AU - MacKay, Sherri

AU - McNaughton, Nancy

AU - Dickens, Susan

AU - Regehr, Glenn

PY - 2002/3/1

Y1 - 2002/3/1

N2 - Background: Our psychiatric Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) group wishes to develop adolescent psychiatry OSCE stations. The literature regarding adolescent standardized patient (SP) selection methods and simulation effects, however, offered limited assurance that such adolescents would not experience adverse simulation effects. Purpose: Evaluation of adolescent SP selection methods and simulation effects for low- and high-stress roles. Method: A two-component (employment-psychological) SP selection method was used. Carefully selected SPs were assigned across three conditions: low-stress medical role, high-stress psychosocial role, and wait list control. Qualitative and quantitative measures were used to assess simulation effects. Results: Our selection method excluded 21% (7% employment and 14% psychological) of SP applicants. For SP participants, beneficial effects included acquisition of job skills and satisfaction in making an important contribution to society. SP reactions of discomfort to roles were reported. Long-term adverse effects were not identified. Conclusions: A two-component adolescent SP selection method is recommended. Adolescent SP benefits outweigh risks.

AB - Background: Our psychiatric Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) group wishes to develop adolescent psychiatry OSCE stations. The literature regarding adolescent standardized patient (SP) selection methods and simulation effects, however, offered limited assurance that such adolescents would not experience adverse simulation effects. Purpose: Evaluation of adolescent SP selection methods and simulation effects for low- and high-stress roles. Method: A two-component (employment-psychological) SP selection method was used. Carefully selected SPs were assigned across three conditions: low-stress medical role, high-stress psychosocial role, and wait list control. Qualitative and quantitative measures were used to assess simulation effects. Results: Our selection method excluded 21% (7% employment and 14% psychological) of SP applicants. For SP participants, beneficial effects included acquisition of job skills and satisfaction in making an important contribution to society. SP reactions of discomfort to roles were reported. Long-term adverse effects were not identified. Conclusions: A two-component adolescent SP selection method is recommended. Adolescent SP benefits outweigh risks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036516842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036516842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12058545

AN - SCOPUS:0036516842

VL - 14

SP - 104

EP - 113

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 2

ER -