Adhoccery in epistemology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Ernest Sosa has argued that the relevant alternatives theory of knowledge has yet to overcome serious difficulties. The most serious difficulty is that of providing criteria for when a rival alternative to a claim is relevant. Without such criteria, the theory is ad hoc. I argue that most other externalist theories of knowledge, including Sosa’s own, fall victim to this criticism. At the end of the paper I make a suggestion as to why Sosa’s objection might not be as damaging as it at first seems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-82
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Papers
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adhoccery in epistemology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this