Adaptive and Maladaptive Components of Rumination? Diagnostic Specificity and Relation to Depressive Biases

Jutta Joormann, Marco Dkane, Ian H. Gotlib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

261 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study investigated the validity of the two-factor solution of items selected from the Rumination Scale of the Response Style Questionnaire proposed by Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). In the first part of this study we used samples of currently depressed (MDD), formerly depressed (FD), socially anxious (SP), and healthy control participants to examine whether the brooding and reflective pondering components differentiate participants with an anxiety disorder from participants with depression. In the second part of this study we examined whether these components of rumination were differentially related to cognitive biases in depression. Overall, the MDD group exhibited higher brooding scores than did all other groups; SP and FD groups did not differ from each other but obtained higher brooding scores than did the control participants. Only the MDD and the control groups differed on the reflective pondering factor. Importantly, brooding and reflective pondering were differentially related to cognitive biases. Specifically, the correlation between brooding/reflective pondering and memory bias was not significant when depressive symptoms were partialed out. The correlation between brooding and attentional bias for sad faces, however, remained significant even when current depressive symptoms were taken into account. In sum, our results support the formulation that rumination is composed of an adaptive reflective pondering factor and a maladaptive brooding factor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-280
Number of pages12
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

Depression
Anxiety Disorders
Healthy Volunteers
Control Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires
Attentional Bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Adaptive and Maladaptive Components of Rumination? Diagnostic Specificity and Relation to Depressive Biases. / Joormann, Jutta; Dkane, Marco; Gotlib, Ian H.

In: Behavior Therapy, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 269-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joormann, Jutta ; Dkane, Marco ; Gotlib, Ian H. / Adaptive and Maladaptive Components of Rumination? Diagnostic Specificity and Relation to Depressive Biases. In: Behavior Therapy. 2006 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 269-280.
@article{f1af033d15c3438d8cca4ed874528dd8,
title = "Adaptive and Maladaptive Components of Rumination? Diagnostic Specificity and Relation to Depressive Biases",
abstract = "The present study investigated the validity of the two-factor solution of items selected from the Rumination Scale of the Response Style Questionnaire proposed by Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). In the first part of this study we used samples of currently depressed (MDD), formerly depressed (FD), socially anxious (SP), and healthy control participants to examine whether the brooding and reflective pondering components differentiate participants with an anxiety disorder from participants with depression. In the second part of this study we examined whether these components of rumination were differentially related to cognitive biases in depression. Overall, the MDD group exhibited higher brooding scores than did all other groups; SP and FD groups did not differ from each other but obtained higher brooding scores than did the control participants. Only the MDD and the control groups differed on the reflective pondering factor. Importantly, brooding and reflective pondering were differentially related to cognitive biases. Specifically, the correlation between brooding/reflective pondering and memory bias was not significant when depressive symptoms were partialed out. The correlation between brooding and attentional bias for sad faces, however, remained significant even when current depressive symptoms were taken into account. In sum, our results support the formulation that rumination is composed of an adaptive reflective pondering factor and a maladaptive brooding factor.",
author = "Jutta Joormann and Marco Dkane and Gotlib, {Ian H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "269--280",
journal = "Behavior Therapy",
issn = "0005-7894",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive and Maladaptive Components of Rumination? Diagnostic Specificity and Relation to Depressive Biases

AU - Joormann, Jutta

AU - Dkane, Marco

AU - Gotlib, Ian H.

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - The present study investigated the validity of the two-factor solution of items selected from the Rumination Scale of the Response Style Questionnaire proposed by Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). In the first part of this study we used samples of currently depressed (MDD), formerly depressed (FD), socially anxious (SP), and healthy control participants to examine whether the brooding and reflective pondering components differentiate participants with an anxiety disorder from participants with depression. In the second part of this study we examined whether these components of rumination were differentially related to cognitive biases in depression. Overall, the MDD group exhibited higher brooding scores than did all other groups; SP and FD groups did not differ from each other but obtained higher brooding scores than did the control participants. Only the MDD and the control groups differed on the reflective pondering factor. Importantly, brooding and reflective pondering were differentially related to cognitive biases. Specifically, the correlation between brooding/reflective pondering and memory bias was not significant when depressive symptoms were partialed out. The correlation between brooding and attentional bias for sad faces, however, remained significant even when current depressive symptoms were taken into account. In sum, our results support the formulation that rumination is composed of an adaptive reflective pondering factor and a maladaptive brooding factor.

AB - The present study investigated the validity of the two-factor solution of items selected from the Rumination Scale of the Response Style Questionnaire proposed by Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). In the first part of this study we used samples of currently depressed (MDD), formerly depressed (FD), socially anxious (SP), and healthy control participants to examine whether the brooding and reflective pondering components differentiate participants with an anxiety disorder from participants with depression. In the second part of this study we examined whether these components of rumination were differentially related to cognitive biases in depression. Overall, the MDD group exhibited higher brooding scores than did all other groups; SP and FD groups did not differ from each other but obtained higher brooding scores than did the control participants. Only the MDD and the control groups differed on the reflective pondering factor. Importantly, brooding and reflective pondering were differentially related to cognitive biases. Specifically, the correlation between brooding/reflective pondering and memory bias was not significant when depressive symptoms were partialed out. The correlation between brooding and attentional bias for sad faces, however, remained significant even when current depressive symptoms were taken into account. In sum, our results support the formulation that rumination is composed of an adaptive reflective pondering factor and a maladaptive brooding factor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746791935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746791935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 16942978

AN - SCOPUS:33746791935

VL - 37

SP - 269

EP - 280

JO - Behavior Therapy

JF - Behavior Therapy

SN - 0005-7894

IS - 3

ER -