Active surveillance

Pitfalls to consider

Barbara Ercole, Dipen J Parekh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

With the pendulum swinging in low risk prostate cancer (PCa) to ideas of overtreatment and overdiagnosis more urologists are looking at Active Surveillance (AS) as a valid option for their low risk PCa patients. AS will undoubtedly hold a place as a management option in men with low risk PCa, however, it is critical to understand its limitations in its current form as highlighted in this article. We conducted a review of multiple computerized databases (Ovid, Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cohrane Library database) with the keywords active surveillance, prostate neoplasm, and low risk PCa. Manual searches were also carried out. Assumptions of AS are discussed and their implications on selecting the appropriate AS candidate. As with any active treatment option offered to patients with PCa, those who are offered AS must be appropriately selected and counseled as to its risks and benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-702
Number of pages8
JournalArchivos Espanoles de Urologia
Volume64
Issue number8
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Databases
PubMed
Libraries
Medical Overuse
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Active Surveillance
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate neoplasm
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Active surveillance : Pitfalls to consider. / Ercole, Barbara; Parekh, Dipen J.

In: Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, Vol. 64, No. 8, 01.10.2011, p. 695-702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ercole, Barbara ; Parekh, Dipen J. / Active surveillance : Pitfalls to consider. In: Archivos Espanoles de Urologia. 2011 ; Vol. 64, No. 8. pp. 695-702.
@article{c0d3fe6174b940b4921cbb14a4431513,
title = "Active surveillance: Pitfalls to consider",
abstract = "With the pendulum swinging in low risk prostate cancer (PCa) to ideas of overtreatment and overdiagnosis more urologists are looking at Active Surveillance (AS) as a valid option for their low risk PCa patients. AS will undoubtedly hold a place as a management option in men with low risk PCa, however, it is critical to understand its limitations in its current form as highlighted in this article. We conducted a review of multiple computerized databases (Ovid, Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cohrane Library database) with the keywords active surveillance, prostate neoplasm, and low risk PCa. Manual searches were also carried out. Assumptions of AS are discussed and their implications on selecting the appropriate AS candidate. As with any active treatment option offered to patients with PCa, those who are offered AS must be appropriately selected and counseled as to its risks and benefits.",
keywords = "Active Surveillance, Prostate cancer, Prostate neoplasm, Treatment",
author = "Barbara Ercole and Parekh, {Dipen J}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "695--702",
journal = "Archivos Espanoles de Urologia",
issn = "0004-0614",
publisher = "Iniestares, S.A.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active surveillance

T2 - Pitfalls to consider

AU - Ercole, Barbara

AU - Parekh, Dipen J

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - With the pendulum swinging in low risk prostate cancer (PCa) to ideas of overtreatment and overdiagnosis more urologists are looking at Active Surveillance (AS) as a valid option for their low risk PCa patients. AS will undoubtedly hold a place as a management option in men with low risk PCa, however, it is critical to understand its limitations in its current form as highlighted in this article. We conducted a review of multiple computerized databases (Ovid, Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cohrane Library database) with the keywords active surveillance, prostate neoplasm, and low risk PCa. Manual searches were also carried out. Assumptions of AS are discussed and their implications on selecting the appropriate AS candidate. As with any active treatment option offered to patients with PCa, those who are offered AS must be appropriately selected and counseled as to its risks and benefits.

AB - With the pendulum swinging in low risk prostate cancer (PCa) to ideas of overtreatment and overdiagnosis more urologists are looking at Active Surveillance (AS) as a valid option for their low risk PCa patients. AS will undoubtedly hold a place as a management option in men with low risk PCa, however, it is critical to understand its limitations in its current form as highlighted in this article. We conducted a review of multiple computerized databases (Ovid, Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cohrane Library database) with the keywords active surveillance, prostate neoplasm, and low risk PCa. Manual searches were also carried out. Assumptions of AS are discussed and their implications on selecting the appropriate AS candidate. As with any active treatment option offered to patients with PCa, those who are offered AS must be appropriately selected and counseled as to its risks and benefits.

KW - Active Surveillance

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Prostate neoplasm

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055007731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055007731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 695

EP - 702

JO - Archivos Espanoles de Urologia

JF - Archivos Espanoles de Urologia

SN - 0004-0614

IS - 8

ER -