Acoustic estimates of zooplankton distributions in Prince William Sound, spring 1996

Jay Kirsch, Gary Thomas, R. Ted Cooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A survey was conducted in Prince William Sound (PWS) in May 1996, to study the volume backscattering of zooplankton using a 420 kHz digital sonar and a multiple opening-closing net environmental sampling system (MOCNESS). While the digital sonar provided continuous fine-scale volume scattering strength measurements, the MOCNESS samples provided zooplankton species, size, and coarse-scale estimates of density and distribution. This catch information was applied to acoustic scattering models to predict zooplankton volume backscattering strength. By least-squares fitting the predicted backscatter values with the measured acoustic backscatter, we determined the reflection coefficients for Neocalanus, pteropods, and eupausiids to be 0.0178, 0.1533, and 0.0341, respectively. By applying these reflection coefficients and the measured animal sizes to the same acoustic models, we were able to calculate target strengths (TSs) for these taxa, which were then applied to the volume scattering information, yielding estimates of the absolute densities of those selected species along continuous transects inside and outside PWS. The comparison of these density values with the density estimates from the MOCNESS showed reasonable agreement, although the distribution of acoustic values was much wider than the MOCNESS due to finer sampling. Since reflection coefficients vary from species to species, it is inappropriate to borrow this value from another species based on similarity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-260
Number of pages16
JournalFisheries Research
Volume47
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

acoustics
zooplankton
sampling
scattering
sonar
backscatter
target strength
transect
distribution
least squares
animal
animals

Keywords

  • Acoustics
  • Inverse problems
  • Least squares
  • MOCNESS
  • Neocalanus
  • Scattering models
  • Sonar
  • Zooplankton

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science

Cite this

Acoustic estimates of zooplankton distributions in Prince William Sound, spring 1996. / Kirsch, Jay; Thomas, Gary; Ted Cooney, R.

In: Fisheries Research, Vol. 47, No. 2-3, 01.07.2000, p. 245-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dc1d918a1f24e04bb26d70afd9eee61,
title = "Acoustic estimates of zooplankton distributions in Prince William Sound, spring 1996",
abstract = "A survey was conducted in Prince William Sound (PWS) in May 1996, to study the volume backscattering of zooplankton using a 420 kHz digital sonar and a multiple opening-closing net environmental sampling system (MOCNESS). While the digital sonar provided continuous fine-scale volume scattering strength measurements, the MOCNESS samples provided zooplankton species, size, and coarse-scale estimates of density and distribution. This catch information was applied to acoustic scattering models to predict zooplankton volume backscattering strength. By least-squares fitting the predicted backscatter values with the measured acoustic backscatter, we determined the reflection coefficients for Neocalanus, pteropods, and eupausiids to be 0.0178, 0.1533, and 0.0341, respectively. By applying these reflection coefficients and the measured animal sizes to the same acoustic models, we were able to calculate target strengths (TSs) for these taxa, which were then applied to the volume scattering information, yielding estimates of the absolute densities of those selected species along continuous transects inside and outside PWS. The comparison of these density values with the density estimates from the MOCNESS showed reasonable agreement, although the distribution of acoustic values was much wider than the MOCNESS due to finer sampling. Since reflection coefficients vary from species to species, it is inappropriate to borrow this value from another species based on similarity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Acoustics, Inverse problems, Least squares, MOCNESS, Neocalanus, Scattering models, Sonar, Zooplankton",
author = "Jay Kirsch and Gary Thomas and {Ted Cooney}, R.",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00173-9",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "245--260",
journal = "Fisheries Research",
issn = "0165-7836",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic estimates of zooplankton distributions in Prince William Sound, spring 1996

AU - Kirsch, Jay

AU - Thomas, Gary

AU - Ted Cooney, R.

PY - 2000/7/1

Y1 - 2000/7/1

N2 - A survey was conducted in Prince William Sound (PWS) in May 1996, to study the volume backscattering of zooplankton using a 420 kHz digital sonar and a multiple opening-closing net environmental sampling system (MOCNESS). While the digital sonar provided continuous fine-scale volume scattering strength measurements, the MOCNESS samples provided zooplankton species, size, and coarse-scale estimates of density and distribution. This catch information was applied to acoustic scattering models to predict zooplankton volume backscattering strength. By least-squares fitting the predicted backscatter values with the measured acoustic backscatter, we determined the reflection coefficients for Neocalanus, pteropods, and eupausiids to be 0.0178, 0.1533, and 0.0341, respectively. By applying these reflection coefficients and the measured animal sizes to the same acoustic models, we were able to calculate target strengths (TSs) for these taxa, which were then applied to the volume scattering information, yielding estimates of the absolute densities of those selected species along continuous transects inside and outside PWS. The comparison of these density values with the density estimates from the MOCNESS showed reasonable agreement, although the distribution of acoustic values was much wider than the MOCNESS due to finer sampling. Since reflection coefficients vary from species to species, it is inappropriate to borrow this value from another species based on similarity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - A survey was conducted in Prince William Sound (PWS) in May 1996, to study the volume backscattering of zooplankton using a 420 kHz digital sonar and a multiple opening-closing net environmental sampling system (MOCNESS). While the digital sonar provided continuous fine-scale volume scattering strength measurements, the MOCNESS samples provided zooplankton species, size, and coarse-scale estimates of density and distribution. This catch information was applied to acoustic scattering models to predict zooplankton volume backscattering strength. By least-squares fitting the predicted backscatter values with the measured acoustic backscatter, we determined the reflection coefficients for Neocalanus, pteropods, and eupausiids to be 0.0178, 0.1533, and 0.0341, respectively. By applying these reflection coefficients and the measured animal sizes to the same acoustic models, we were able to calculate target strengths (TSs) for these taxa, which were then applied to the volume scattering information, yielding estimates of the absolute densities of those selected species along continuous transects inside and outside PWS. The comparison of these density values with the density estimates from the MOCNESS showed reasonable agreement, although the distribution of acoustic values was much wider than the MOCNESS due to finer sampling. Since reflection coefficients vary from species to species, it is inappropriate to borrow this value from another species based on similarity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Acoustics

KW - Inverse problems

KW - Least squares

KW - MOCNESS

KW - Neocalanus

KW - Scattering models

KW - Sonar

KW - Zooplankton

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034044539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034044539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00173-9

DO - 10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00173-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034044539

VL - 47

SP - 245

EP - 260

JO - Fisheries Research

JF - Fisheries Research

SN - 0165-7836

IS - 2-3

ER -