Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus palpation-based carpometacarpal joint injections: A randomized pilot study in cadavers

Armen Derian, Julia Amundson, Karl Abi-Aad, Ricardo Vasquez-Duarte, Douglas E Johnson-Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of ultrasound guidance compared to palpation in performing carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. Design: In all, 36 carpometacarpal joints were randomized to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-based injections, with 1 cc of blue latex solution injected into each joint. The specimens were then dissected and the distribution of the latex was assessed by two independent, blinded raters. Injection accuracy was evaluated on a four-point quartile rating scale of 1–4, corresponding to the amount of the latex solution within the joint (1 = 0–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = 76–100%). Inter-rater reliability was a secondary measure. Results: The mean rating of accuracy was 2.1 for both palpation-based and ultrasound-guided injections. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the two injectors. Chi-square analysis testing differences in accuracy for the two conditions was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha for rater 2 was 0.74, which represents an acceptable level of reliability. A Friedman’s Chi-square for the two raters was 2.3 (p = 0.13), indicating no significant difference between raters. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance did not improve the accuracy of carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. However, the high inter-rater reliability attests to the value of the novel assessment scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUltrasound
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Carpometacarpal Joints
Palpation
Cadaver
Latex
Injections
Joints

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • carpometacarpal joint
  • injection
  • Ultrasound
  • ultrasound guided injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus palpation-based carpometacarpal joint injections : A randomized pilot study in cadavers. / Derian, Armen; Amundson, Julia; Abi-Aad, Karl; Vasquez-Duarte, Ricardo; Johnson-Greene, Douglas E.

In: Ultrasound, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2cb426b7ba046479bfc676f9ae32f3e,
title = "Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus palpation-based carpometacarpal joint injections: A randomized pilot study in cadavers",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the accuracy of ultrasound guidance compared to palpation in performing carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. Design: In all, 36 carpometacarpal joints were randomized to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-based injections, with 1 cc of blue latex solution injected into each joint. The specimens were then dissected and the distribution of the latex was assessed by two independent, blinded raters. Injection accuracy was evaluated on a four-point quartile rating scale of 1–4, corresponding to the amount of the latex solution within the joint (1 = 0–25{\%}, 2 = 26–50{\%}, 3 = 51–75{\%}, 4 = 76–100{\%}). Inter-rater reliability was a secondary measure. Results: The mean rating of accuracy was 2.1 for both palpation-based and ultrasound-guided injections. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the two injectors. Chi-square analysis testing differences in accuracy for the two conditions was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha for rater 2 was 0.74, which represents an acceptable level of reliability. A Friedman’s Chi-square for the two raters was 2.3 (p = 0.13), indicating no significant difference between raters. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance did not improve the accuracy of carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. However, the high inter-rater reliability attests to the value of the novel assessment scale.",
keywords = "accuracy, carpometacarpal joint, injection, Ultrasound, ultrasound guided injections",
author = "Armen Derian and Julia Amundson and Karl Abi-Aad and Ricardo Vasquez-Duarte and Johnson-Greene, {Douglas E}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1742271X18789711",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ultrasound",
issn = "1742-271X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus palpation-based carpometacarpal joint injections

T2 - A randomized pilot study in cadavers

AU - Derian, Armen

AU - Amundson, Julia

AU - Abi-Aad, Karl

AU - Vasquez-Duarte, Ricardo

AU - Johnson-Greene, Douglas E

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine the accuracy of ultrasound guidance compared to palpation in performing carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. Design: In all, 36 carpometacarpal joints were randomized to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-based injections, with 1 cc of blue latex solution injected into each joint. The specimens were then dissected and the distribution of the latex was assessed by two independent, blinded raters. Injection accuracy was evaluated on a four-point quartile rating scale of 1–4, corresponding to the amount of the latex solution within the joint (1 = 0–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = 76–100%). Inter-rater reliability was a secondary measure. Results: The mean rating of accuracy was 2.1 for both palpation-based and ultrasound-guided injections. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the two injectors. Chi-square analysis testing differences in accuracy for the two conditions was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha for rater 2 was 0.74, which represents an acceptable level of reliability. A Friedman’s Chi-square for the two raters was 2.3 (p = 0.13), indicating no significant difference between raters. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance did not improve the accuracy of carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. However, the high inter-rater reliability attests to the value of the novel assessment scale.

AB - Objective: To determine the accuracy of ultrasound guidance compared to palpation in performing carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. Design: In all, 36 carpometacarpal joints were randomized to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-based injections, with 1 cc of blue latex solution injected into each joint. The specimens were then dissected and the distribution of the latex was assessed by two independent, blinded raters. Injection accuracy was evaluated on a four-point quartile rating scale of 1–4, corresponding to the amount of the latex solution within the joint (1 = 0–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = 76–100%). Inter-rater reliability was a secondary measure. Results: The mean rating of accuracy was 2.1 for both palpation-based and ultrasound-guided injections. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the two injectors. Chi-square analysis testing differences in accuracy for the two conditions was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha for rater 2 was 0.74, which represents an acceptable level of reliability. A Friedman’s Chi-square for the two raters was 2.3 (p = 0.13), indicating no significant difference between raters. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance did not improve the accuracy of carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. However, the high inter-rater reliability attests to the value of the novel assessment scale.

KW - accuracy

KW - carpometacarpal joint

KW - injection

KW - Ultrasound

KW - ultrasound guided injections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052373735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052373735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1742271X18789711

DO - 10.1177/1742271X18789711

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052373735

JO - Ultrasound

JF - Ultrasound

SN - 1742-271X

ER -