Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

Jonathan Lessick, Eduard Ghersin, Sobhi Abadi, Sergey Yalonetsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful for assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. Validation has mainly been carried out using Simpson's method of summing up consecutive short-axis areas. Because the latter method is time-consuming, many users prefer using a quicker method, based on a single view or a pair of views. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the long-axis area-length method (AL), which has not been validated for MDCT, using Simpson's method as the gold standard, as well as right anterior oblique LV angiography as a clinical standard. Methods: Twenty-three patients admitted with acute chest pain were clinically evaluated with electrocardiogram-gated MDCT and invasive LV angiography. MDCT-based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated using Simpson's method, biplane AL and single-plane AL. For LV angiography, EF was calculated using single-plane AL. Results: A Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between biplane AL and Simpson's method for EF, with 1% underestimation, 95% CI of ±11% and a correlation of 0.89. For end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, overestimations of 7 mL, 4 mL and 2 mL, and 95% CI of ±27 mL, ±15 mL and ±26 mL, respectively were found. Correlation coefficients were 0.95, 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Comparisons with LV angiography were considerably weaker. The vertical long-axis AL method by MDCT correlated better with both LV angiography and Simpson's method than the horizontal long-axis AL method. Conclusions: The biplane AL method gives results for EF, which correspond closely with the more cumbersome Simpson's method, although volumes are slightly overestimated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)685-689
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number9
StatePublished - Dec 10 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Stroke Volume
Angiography

Keywords

  • Catheterization
  • Imaging
  • Left ventricle
  • Myocardial contraction
  • Myocardial infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography. / Lessick, Jonathan; Ghersin, Eduard; Abadi, Sobhi; Yalonetsky, Sergey.

In: Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 24, No. 9, 10.12.2008, p. 685-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{708a758be7d74cb1bae6a55d41dc25fe,
title = "Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography",
abstract = "Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful for assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. Validation has mainly been carried out using Simpson's method of summing up consecutive short-axis areas. Because the latter method is time-consuming, many users prefer using a quicker method, based on a single view or a pair of views. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the long-axis area-length method (AL), which has not been validated for MDCT, using Simpson's method as the gold standard, as well as right anterior oblique LV angiography as a clinical standard. Methods: Twenty-three patients admitted with acute chest pain were clinically evaluated with electrocardiogram-gated MDCT and invasive LV angiography. MDCT-based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated using Simpson's method, biplane AL and single-plane AL. For LV angiography, EF was calculated using single-plane AL. Results: A Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between biplane AL and Simpson's method for EF, with 1{\%} underestimation, 95{\%} CI of ±11{\%} and a correlation of 0.89. For end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, overestimations of 7 mL, 4 mL and 2 mL, and 95{\%} CI of ±27 mL, ±15 mL and ±26 mL, respectively were found. Correlation coefficients were 0.95, 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Comparisons with LV angiography were considerably weaker. The vertical long-axis AL method by MDCT correlated better with both LV angiography and Simpson's method than the horizontal long-axis AL method. Conclusions: The biplane AL method gives results for EF, which correspond closely with the more cumbersome Simpson's method, although volumes are slightly overestimated.",
keywords = "Catheterization, Imaging, Left ventricle, Myocardial contraction, Myocardial infarction",
author = "Jonathan Lessick and Eduard Ghersin and Sobhi Abadi and Sergey Yalonetsky",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "685--689",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0828-282X",
publisher = "Pulsus Group Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

AU - Lessick, Jonathan

AU - Ghersin, Eduard

AU - Abadi, Sobhi

AU - Yalonetsky, Sergey

PY - 2008/12/10

Y1 - 2008/12/10

N2 - Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful for assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. Validation has mainly been carried out using Simpson's method of summing up consecutive short-axis areas. Because the latter method is time-consuming, many users prefer using a quicker method, based on a single view or a pair of views. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the long-axis area-length method (AL), which has not been validated for MDCT, using Simpson's method as the gold standard, as well as right anterior oblique LV angiography as a clinical standard. Methods: Twenty-three patients admitted with acute chest pain were clinically evaluated with electrocardiogram-gated MDCT and invasive LV angiography. MDCT-based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated using Simpson's method, biplane AL and single-plane AL. For LV angiography, EF was calculated using single-plane AL. Results: A Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between biplane AL and Simpson's method for EF, with 1% underestimation, 95% CI of ±11% and a correlation of 0.89. For end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, overestimations of 7 mL, 4 mL and 2 mL, and 95% CI of ±27 mL, ±15 mL and ±26 mL, respectively were found. Correlation coefficients were 0.95, 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Comparisons with LV angiography were considerably weaker. The vertical long-axis AL method by MDCT correlated better with both LV angiography and Simpson's method than the horizontal long-axis AL method. Conclusions: The biplane AL method gives results for EF, which correspond closely with the more cumbersome Simpson's method, although volumes are slightly overestimated.

AB - Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful for assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. Validation has mainly been carried out using Simpson's method of summing up consecutive short-axis areas. Because the latter method is time-consuming, many users prefer using a quicker method, based on a single view or a pair of views. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of the long-axis area-length method (AL), which has not been validated for MDCT, using Simpson's method as the gold standard, as well as right anterior oblique LV angiography as a clinical standard. Methods: Twenty-three patients admitted with acute chest pain were clinically evaluated with electrocardiogram-gated MDCT and invasive LV angiography. MDCT-based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated using Simpson's method, biplane AL and single-plane AL. For LV angiography, EF was calculated using single-plane AL. Results: A Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between biplane AL and Simpson's method for EF, with 1% underestimation, 95% CI of ±11% and a correlation of 0.89. For end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, overestimations of 7 mL, 4 mL and 2 mL, and 95% CI of ±27 mL, ±15 mL and ±26 mL, respectively were found. Correlation coefficients were 0.95, 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Comparisons with LV angiography were considerably weaker. The vertical long-axis AL method by MDCT correlated better with both LV angiography and Simpson's method than the horizontal long-axis AL method. Conclusions: The biplane AL method gives results for EF, which correspond closely with the more cumbersome Simpson's method, although volumes are slightly overestimated.

KW - Catheterization

KW - Imaging

KW - Left ventricle

KW - Myocardial contraction

KW - Myocardial infarction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049145597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049145597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18787718

AN - SCOPUS:54049145597

VL - 24

SP - 685

EP - 689

JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0828-282X

IS - 9

ER -