Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals

C. Sarantopoulos, A. Fassoulaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals we examined all 1989 and 1991 volumes of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia and European Journal of Anaesthesiology, and counted the number of entries and the number of errors in both indexes. The number of errors was expressed as a percentage of the number of entries, and the incidences of errors were compared by chi-square contingency table tests. The overall error rate in both indexes and for both years (1989 and 1991) differed significantly among the five journals (P < 0.001). Many of the individual differences were also significant. British Journal of Anaesthesia had the lowest error rate (0.9%), followed by Anesthesia and Analgesia (2.4%), Anesthesiology (3%), European Journal of Anaesthesiology (2.9%) and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (11.4%). The combined index accuracy was improved from 1989 to 1991 for Anesthesia and Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, did not change for European Journal of Anaesthesiology and was worse for Anesthesiology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-106
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 20 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Anesthesia
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Individuality
Incidence

Keywords

  • Anaesthesia journals
  • Publications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals. / Sarantopoulos, C.; Fassoulaki, A.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 74, No. 1, 20.01.1995, p. 104-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{caaddb87c336413086454d824923f6ef,
title = "Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals",
abstract = "To determine the accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals we examined all 1989 and 1991 volumes of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia and European Journal of Anaesthesiology, and counted the number of entries and the number of errors in both indexes. The number of errors was expressed as a percentage of the number of entries, and the incidences of errors were compared by chi-square contingency table tests. The overall error rate in both indexes and for both years (1989 and 1991) differed significantly among the five journals (P < 0.001). Many of the individual differences were also significant. British Journal of Anaesthesia had the lowest error rate (0.9{\%}), followed by Anesthesia and Analgesia (2.4{\%}), Anesthesiology (3{\%}), European Journal of Anaesthesiology (2.9{\%}) and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (11.4{\%}). The combined index accuracy was improved from 1989 to 1991 for Anesthesia and Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, did not change for European Journal of Anaesthesiology and was worse for Anesthesiology.",
keywords = "Anaesthesia journals, Publications",
author = "C. Sarantopoulos and A. Fassoulaki",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/bja/74.1.104",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "104--106",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals

AU - Sarantopoulos, C.

AU - Fassoulaki, A.

PY - 1995/1/20

Y1 - 1995/1/20

N2 - To determine the accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals we examined all 1989 and 1991 volumes of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia and European Journal of Anaesthesiology, and counted the number of entries and the number of errors in both indexes. The number of errors was expressed as a percentage of the number of entries, and the incidences of errors were compared by chi-square contingency table tests. The overall error rate in both indexes and for both years (1989 and 1991) differed significantly among the five journals (P < 0.001). Many of the individual differences were also significant. British Journal of Anaesthesia had the lowest error rate (0.9%), followed by Anesthesia and Analgesia (2.4%), Anesthesiology (3%), European Journal of Anaesthesiology (2.9%) and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (11.4%). The combined index accuracy was improved from 1989 to 1991 for Anesthesia and Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, did not change for European Journal of Anaesthesiology and was worse for Anesthesiology.

AB - To determine the accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals we examined all 1989 and 1991 volumes of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia and European Journal of Anaesthesiology, and counted the number of entries and the number of errors in both indexes. The number of errors was expressed as a percentage of the number of entries, and the incidences of errors were compared by chi-square contingency table tests. The overall error rate in both indexes and for both years (1989 and 1991) differed significantly among the five journals (P < 0.001). Many of the individual differences were also significant. British Journal of Anaesthesia had the lowest error rate (0.9%), followed by Anesthesia and Analgesia (2.4%), Anesthesiology (3%), European Journal of Anaesthesiology (2.9%) and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (11.4%). The combined index accuracy was improved from 1989 to 1991 for Anesthesia and Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, did not change for European Journal of Anaesthesiology and was worse for Anesthesiology.

KW - Anaesthesia journals

KW - Publications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028854141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028854141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bja/74.1.104

DO - 10.1093/bja/74.1.104

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 104

EP - 106

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 1

ER -