Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion

Karla E Maguire, Kathleen Morrell, Carolyn Westhoff, Anne Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Providers often underestimate patient pain. This study investigated if providers accurately assess pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants rated pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Providers marked a similar VAS for maximum level and timing of participant pain. Results The mean patient maximum pain was 64.8 mm (SD, 27) compared to 35.3 mm (SD, 26) rated by the provider (p<.001). Patient and provider agreement on most painful time point of procedure was weak (kappa statistic, 0.16). Conclusions Providers underestimate pain during IUD insertion. Implications To our knowledge, this is the first paper to compare provider and patient perceptions of pain during IUD insertion. Understanding this relationship will help guide further research about IUD insertion pain and techniques and could improve patient counseling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-24
Number of pages3
JournalContraception
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Intrauterine Devices
Pain Measurement
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Pain Perception
Counseling
Research

Keywords

  • Intrauterine device insertion
  • IUD insertion
  • Pain
  • Provider perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion. / Maguire, Karla E; Morrell, Kathleen; Westhoff, Carolyn; Davis, Anne.

In: Contraception, Vol. 89, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 22-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maguire, Karla E ; Morrell, Kathleen ; Westhoff, Carolyn ; Davis, Anne. / Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion. In: Contraception. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 1. pp. 22-24.
@article{7e41764e1d4c4af588bc8a2db2deadef,
title = "Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion",
abstract = "Background Providers often underestimate patient pain. This study investigated if providers accurately assess pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants rated pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Providers marked a similar VAS for maximum level and timing of participant pain. Results The mean patient maximum pain was 64.8 mm (SD, 27) compared to 35.3 mm (SD, 26) rated by the provider (p<.001). Patient and provider agreement on most painful time point of procedure was weak (kappa statistic, 0.16). Conclusions Providers underestimate pain during IUD insertion. Implications To our knowledge, this is the first paper to compare provider and patient perceptions of pain during IUD insertion. Understanding this relationship will help guide further research about IUD insertion pain and techniques and could improve patient counseling.",
keywords = "Intrauterine device insertion, IUD insertion, Pain, Provider perception",
author = "Maguire, {Karla E} and Kathleen Morrell and Carolyn Westhoff and Anne Davis",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "22--24",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of providers' assessment of pain during intrauterine device insertion

AU - Maguire, Karla E

AU - Morrell, Kathleen

AU - Westhoff, Carolyn

AU - Davis, Anne

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background Providers often underestimate patient pain. This study investigated if providers accurately assess pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants rated pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Providers marked a similar VAS for maximum level and timing of participant pain. Results The mean patient maximum pain was 64.8 mm (SD, 27) compared to 35.3 mm (SD, 26) rated by the provider (p<.001). Patient and provider agreement on most painful time point of procedure was weak (kappa statistic, 0.16). Conclusions Providers underestimate pain during IUD insertion. Implications To our knowledge, this is the first paper to compare provider and patient perceptions of pain during IUD insertion. Understanding this relationship will help guide further research about IUD insertion pain and techniques and could improve patient counseling.

AB - Background Providers often underestimate patient pain. This study investigated if providers accurately assess pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants rated pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Providers marked a similar VAS for maximum level and timing of participant pain. Results The mean patient maximum pain was 64.8 mm (SD, 27) compared to 35.3 mm (SD, 26) rated by the provider (p<.001). Patient and provider agreement on most painful time point of procedure was weak (kappa statistic, 0.16). Conclusions Providers underestimate pain during IUD insertion. Implications To our knowledge, this is the first paper to compare provider and patient perceptions of pain during IUD insertion. Understanding this relationship will help guide further research about IUD insertion pain and techniques and could improve patient counseling.

KW - Intrauterine device insertion

KW - IUD insertion

KW - Pain

KW - Provider perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889095348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889095348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 24134898

AN - SCOPUS:84889095348

VL - 89

SP - 22

EP - 24

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 1

ER -