Accuracy of Knee Range of Motion Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Carlos Lavernia, Michele D'Apuzzo, Mark D. Rossi, David J Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurement of knee joint range of motion (ROM) is important to assess after total knee arthroplasty. Our objective was to determine level of agreement and accuracy between observers with different knowledge on total ROM after total knee arthroplasty. Forty-one patients underwent x-ray of active and passive knee ROM (gold standard). Five different raters evaluated observed and measured ROM: orthopedic surgeon, clinical fellow, physician assistant, research fellow, and a physical therapist. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in ROM between raters over both conditions. Limit of agreement for each rater for both active and passive total ROM under both conditions was calculated. Analysis of variance indicated a difference between raters for all conditions (range, P = .004 to P ≤.0001). The trend for all raters was to overestimate ROM at higher ranges. Assessment of ROM through direct observation without a goniometer provides inaccurate findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-91
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume23
Issue number6 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Articular Range of Motion
Knee
Analysis of Variance
Physician Assistants
Physical Therapists
Knee Joint
Observation
X-Rays

Keywords

  • knee flexion
  • range of motion
  • total knee arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Accuracy of Knee Range of Motion Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty. / Lavernia, Carlos; D'Apuzzo, Michele; Rossi, Mark D.; Lee, David J.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 23, No. 6 SUPPL., 01.09.2008, p. 85-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lavernia, Carlos ; D'Apuzzo, Michele ; Rossi, Mark D. ; Lee, David J. / Accuracy of Knee Range of Motion Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 6 SUPPL. pp. 85-91.
@article{08d927acd1554b318acf7889676e3c24,
title = "Accuracy of Knee Range of Motion Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty",
abstract = "Measurement of knee joint range of motion (ROM) is important to assess after total knee arthroplasty. Our objective was to determine level of agreement and accuracy between observers with different knowledge on total ROM after total knee arthroplasty. Forty-one patients underwent x-ray of active and passive knee ROM (gold standard). Five different raters evaluated observed and measured ROM: orthopedic surgeon, clinical fellow, physician assistant, research fellow, and a physical therapist. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in ROM between raters over both conditions. Limit of agreement for each rater for both active and passive total ROM under both conditions was calculated. Analysis of variance indicated a difference between raters for all conditions (range, P = .004 to P ≤.0001). The trend for all raters was to overestimate ROM at higher ranges. Assessment of ROM through direct observation without a goniometer provides inaccurate findings.",
keywords = "knee flexion, range of motion, total knee arthroplasty",
author = "Carlos Lavernia and Michele D'Apuzzo and Rossi, {Mark D.} and Lee, {David J}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "85--91",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Knee Range of Motion Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty

AU - Lavernia, Carlos

AU - D'Apuzzo, Michele

AU - Rossi, Mark D.

AU - Lee, David J

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - Measurement of knee joint range of motion (ROM) is important to assess after total knee arthroplasty. Our objective was to determine level of agreement and accuracy between observers with different knowledge on total ROM after total knee arthroplasty. Forty-one patients underwent x-ray of active and passive knee ROM (gold standard). Five different raters evaluated observed and measured ROM: orthopedic surgeon, clinical fellow, physician assistant, research fellow, and a physical therapist. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in ROM between raters over both conditions. Limit of agreement for each rater for both active and passive total ROM under both conditions was calculated. Analysis of variance indicated a difference between raters for all conditions (range, P = .004 to P ≤.0001). The trend for all raters was to overestimate ROM at higher ranges. Assessment of ROM through direct observation without a goniometer provides inaccurate findings.

AB - Measurement of knee joint range of motion (ROM) is important to assess after total knee arthroplasty. Our objective was to determine level of agreement and accuracy between observers with different knowledge on total ROM after total knee arthroplasty. Forty-one patients underwent x-ray of active and passive knee ROM (gold standard). Five different raters evaluated observed and measured ROM: orthopedic surgeon, clinical fellow, physician assistant, research fellow, and a physical therapist. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences in ROM between raters over both conditions. Limit of agreement for each rater for both active and passive total ROM under both conditions was calculated. Analysis of variance indicated a difference between raters for all conditions (range, P = .004 to P ≤.0001). The trend for all raters was to overestimate ROM at higher ranges. Assessment of ROM through direct observation without a goniometer provides inaccurate findings.

KW - knee flexion

KW - range of motion

KW - total knee arthroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49549114891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49549114891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 18722308

AN - SCOPUS:49549114891

VL - 23

SP - 85

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 6 SUPPL.

ER -