Accuracy of frame-based and frameless systems for deep brain stimulation: A meta-analysis

Andrew Roth, Simon S. Buttrick, Iahn Cajigas, Jonathan R. Jagid, Michael E. Ivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders. It relies on the accurate placement of leads within small nuclei in the basal ganglia. Traditionally, this has been done with great success using frame-based stereotaxy. More recently, frameless systems have been introduced, and several studies have investigated whether they can achieve a similar accuracy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the difference in targeting accuracy between frameless and frame-based systems in deep brain stimulation, using prior studies reporting error in all cardinal directions. We recorded the mean error and standard deviation, and calculated the composite mean difference in error between frame-based and frameless methods using standard difference of means. A total of 76 papers were screened, 25 papers were further assessed, and 5 papers were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 425 DBS electrode placements evaluated. Standard difference of means analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit to frame-based stereotaxy for the x and y coordinates with p = 0.036 and p = 0.0025, respectively. There was no significant difference in the z coordinate. However, the mean differences between frame-based and frameless stereotaxy was small and the composite mean differences were found to be 0.3037 mm, 0.0305 mm, and 0.1630 mm in the x, y and z direction. Our analysis shows that frameless systems represent a reasonable alternative to frame-based methods. Though there was a statistically significant loss of accuracy with frameless methods, the size of this effect was very small and of questionable clinical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Deep Brain Stimulation
Meta-Analysis
Neuronavigation
Movement Disorders
Basal Ganglia
Electrodes
Direction compound
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • DBS
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Frame-based
  • Frameless
  • Stereotaxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Accuracy of frame-based and frameless systems for deep brain stimulation : A meta-analysis. / Roth, Andrew; Buttrick, Simon S.; Cajigas, Iahn; Jagid, Jonathan R.; Ivan, Michael E.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3947c0b381084489914078e946c8efe7,
title = "Accuracy of frame-based and frameless systems for deep brain stimulation: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders. It relies on the accurate placement of leads within small nuclei in the basal ganglia. Traditionally, this has been done with great success using frame-based stereotaxy. More recently, frameless systems have been introduced, and several studies have investigated whether they can achieve a similar accuracy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the difference in targeting accuracy between frameless and frame-based systems in deep brain stimulation, using prior studies reporting error in all cardinal directions. We recorded the mean error and standard deviation, and calculated the composite mean difference in error between frame-based and frameless methods using standard difference of means. A total of 76 papers were screened, 25 papers were further assessed, and 5 papers were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 425 DBS electrode placements evaluated. Standard difference of means analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit to frame-based stereotaxy for the x and y coordinates with p = 0.036 and p = 0.0025, respectively. There was no significant difference in the z coordinate. However, the mean differences between frame-based and frameless stereotaxy was small and the composite mean differences were found to be 0.3037 mm, 0.0305 mm, and 0.1630 mm in the x, y and z direction. Our analysis shows that frameless systems represent a reasonable alternative to frame-based methods. Though there was a statistically significant loss of accuracy with frameless methods, the size of this effect was very small and of questionable clinical significance.",
keywords = "Accuracy, DBS, Deep brain stimulation, Frame-based, Frameless, Stereotaxy",
author = "Andrew Roth and Buttrick, {Simon S.} and Iahn Cajigas and Jagid, {Jonathan R.} and Ivan, {Michael E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.039",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of frame-based and frameless systems for deep brain stimulation

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Roth, Andrew

AU - Buttrick, Simon S.

AU - Cajigas, Iahn

AU - Jagid, Jonathan R.

AU - Ivan, Michael E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders. It relies on the accurate placement of leads within small nuclei in the basal ganglia. Traditionally, this has been done with great success using frame-based stereotaxy. More recently, frameless systems have been introduced, and several studies have investigated whether they can achieve a similar accuracy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the difference in targeting accuracy between frameless and frame-based systems in deep brain stimulation, using prior studies reporting error in all cardinal directions. We recorded the mean error and standard deviation, and calculated the composite mean difference in error between frame-based and frameless methods using standard difference of means. A total of 76 papers were screened, 25 papers were further assessed, and 5 papers were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 425 DBS electrode placements evaluated. Standard difference of means analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit to frame-based stereotaxy for the x and y coordinates with p = 0.036 and p = 0.0025, respectively. There was no significant difference in the z coordinate. However, the mean differences between frame-based and frameless stereotaxy was small and the composite mean differences were found to be 0.3037 mm, 0.0305 mm, and 0.1630 mm in the x, y and z direction. Our analysis shows that frameless systems represent a reasonable alternative to frame-based methods. Though there was a statistically significant loss of accuracy with frameless methods, the size of this effect was very small and of questionable clinical significance.

AB - Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders. It relies on the accurate placement of leads within small nuclei in the basal ganglia. Traditionally, this has been done with great success using frame-based stereotaxy. More recently, frameless systems have been introduced, and several studies have investigated whether they can achieve a similar accuracy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the difference in targeting accuracy between frameless and frame-based systems in deep brain stimulation, using prior studies reporting error in all cardinal directions. We recorded the mean error and standard deviation, and calculated the composite mean difference in error between frame-based and frameless methods using standard difference of means. A total of 76 papers were screened, 25 papers were further assessed, and 5 papers were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 425 DBS electrode placements evaluated. Standard difference of means analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit to frame-based stereotaxy for the x and y coordinates with p = 0.036 and p = 0.0025, respectively. There was no significant difference in the z coordinate. However, the mean differences between frame-based and frameless stereotaxy was small and the composite mean differences were found to be 0.3037 mm, 0.0305 mm, and 0.1630 mm in the x, y and z direction. Our analysis shows that frameless systems represent a reasonable alternative to frame-based methods. Though there was a statistically significant loss of accuracy with frameless methods, the size of this effect was very small and of questionable clinical significance.

KW - Accuracy

KW - DBS

KW - Deep brain stimulation

KW - Frame-based

KW - Frameless

KW - Stereotaxy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052949100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052949100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.039

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.039

M3 - Article

C2 - 30197058

AN - SCOPUS:85052949100

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

ER -