Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery

Ronald P. Olson, Adam J. Schow, Richard McCann, David Lubarsky, Tong J. Gan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The decision to cancel vascular access surgery because of hyperkalemia requires knowledge of the risks vs benefits. This study sought to identify and characterize cases where surgery had been performed in patients with uncorrected hyperkalemia. Methods: One thousand four hundred and seventy-two consecutive cases of vascular access surgery at an academic medical centre between 1995 and 2000 by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eight cases had clear documentation that the case proceeded with hyperkalemia. Anesthesia techniques were one general anesthetic, one regional block, five monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and one local infiltration only. Mean potassium was 6.9 mmol·L-1 (range 6.1-8.0). In this series of selected asymptomatic hyperkalemic patients undergoing low risk surgery, no adverse results occurred. Conclusion: While this review of eight cases (only one receiving general anesthesia) cannot be used to prove the safety of proceeding to surgery with uncorrected hyperkalemia, it does suggest that asymptomatic hyperkalemia may not be an absolute contraindication to vascular access surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)553-557
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume50
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hyperkalemia
Blood Vessels
Anesthesia
General Anesthetics
Documentation
General Anesthesia
Potassium
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Olson, R. P., Schow, A. J., McCann, R., Lubarsky, D., & Gan, T. J. (2003). Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 50(6), 553-557.

Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery. / Olson, Ronald P.; Schow, Adam J.; McCann, Richard; Lubarsky, David; Gan, Tong J.

In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.06.2003, p. 553-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olson, RP, Schow, AJ, McCann, R, Lubarsky, D & Gan, TJ 2003, 'Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery', Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 553-557.
Olson RP, Schow AJ, McCann R, Lubarsky D, Gan TJ. Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2003 Jun 1;50(6):553-557.
Olson, Ronald P. ; Schow, Adam J. ; McCann, Richard ; Lubarsky, David ; Gan, Tong J. / Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery. In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2003 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 553-557.
@article{4bfdc44bc2fc4b5a93f14435a317d749,
title = "Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery",
abstract = "Purpose: The decision to cancel vascular access surgery because of hyperkalemia requires knowledge of the risks vs benefits. This study sought to identify and characterize cases where surgery had been performed in patients with uncorrected hyperkalemia. Methods: One thousand four hundred and seventy-two consecutive cases of vascular access surgery at an academic medical centre between 1995 and 2000 by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eight cases had clear documentation that the case proceeded with hyperkalemia. Anesthesia techniques were one general anesthetic, one regional block, five monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and one local infiltration only. Mean potassium was 6.9 mmol·L-1 (range 6.1-8.0). In this series of selected asymptomatic hyperkalemic patients undergoing low risk surgery, no adverse results occurred. Conclusion: While this review of eight cases (only one receiving general anesthesia) cannot be used to prove the safety of proceeding to surgery with uncorrected hyperkalemia, it does suggest that asymptomatic hyperkalemia may not be an absolute contraindication to vascular access surgery.",
author = "Olson, {Ronald P.} and Schow, {Adam J.} and Richard McCann and David Lubarsky and Gan, {Tong J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "553--557",
journal = "Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesth{\'e}sie",
issn = "0008-2856",
publisher = "Canadian Anaesthetists Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery

AU - Olson, Ronald P.

AU - Schow, Adam J.

AU - McCann, Richard

AU - Lubarsky, David

AU - Gan, Tong J.

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

N2 - Purpose: The decision to cancel vascular access surgery because of hyperkalemia requires knowledge of the risks vs benefits. This study sought to identify and characterize cases where surgery had been performed in patients with uncorrected hyperkalemia. Methods: One thousand four hundred and seventy-two consecutive cases of vascular access surgery at an academic medical centre between 1995 and 2000 by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eight cases had clear documentation that the case proceeded with hyperkalemia. Anesthesia techniques were one general anesthetic, one regional block, five monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and one local infiltration only. Mean potassium was 6.9 mmol·L-1 (range 6.1-8.0). In this series of selected asymptomatic hyperkalemic patients undergoing low risk surgery, no adverse results occurred. Conclusion: While this review of eight cases (only one receiving general anesthesia) cannot be used to prove the safety of proceeding to surgery with uncorrected hyperkalemia, it does suggest that asymptomatic hyperkalemia may not be an absolute contraindication to vascular access surgery.

AB - Purpose: The decision to cancel vascular access surgery because of hyperkalemia requires knowledge of the risks vs benefits. This study sought to identify and characterize cases where surgery had been performed in patients with uncorrected hyperkalemia. Methods: One thousand four hundred and seventy-two consecutive cases of vascular access surgery at an academic medical centre between 1995 and 2000 by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eight cases had clear documentation that the case proceeded with hyperkalemia. Anesthesia techniques were one general anesthetic, one regional block, five monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and one local infiltration only. Mean potassium was 6.9 mmol·L-1 (range 6.1-8.0). In this series of selected asymptomatic hyperkalemic patients undergoing low risk surgery, no adverse results occurred. Conclusion: While this review of eight cases (only one receiving general anesthesia) cannot be used to prove the safety of proceeding to surgery with uncorrected hyperkalemia, it does suggest that asymptomatic hyperkalemia may not be an absolute contraindication to vascular access surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041422298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041422298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12826545

AN - SCOPUS:0041422298

VL - 50

SP - 553

EP - 557

JO - Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie

JF - Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie

SN - 0008-2856

IS - 6

ER -