Abbreviated neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia: Prediction of different aspects of outcome

Philip D Harvey, Richard S E Keefe, Thomas L. Patterson, Robert K. Heaton, Christopher R. Bowie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the best subset of neuropsychological tests for prediction of several different aspects of functioning in a large (n = 236) sample of older people with schizophrenia. While the validity of abbreviated assessment methods has been examined before, there has never been a comparative study of the prediction of different elements of cognitive impairment, real-world outcomes, and performance-based measures of functional capacity. Scores on 10 different tests from a neuropsychological assessment battery were used to predict global neuropsychological (NP) performance (indexed with averaged scores or calculated general deficit scores), performance-based indices of everyday-living skills and social competence, and case-manager ratings of real-world functioning. Forward entry stepwise regression analyses were used to identify the best predictors for each of the outcomes measures. Then, the analyses were adjusted for estimated premorbid IQ, which reduced the magnitude, but not the structure, of the correlations. Substantial amounts (over 70%) of the variance in overall NP performance were accounted for by a limited number of NP tests. Considerable variance in measures of functional capacity was also accounted for by a limited number of tests. Different tests constituted the best predictor set for each outcome measure. A substantial proportion of the variance in several different NP and functional outcomes can be accounted for by a small number of NP tests that can be completed in a few minutes, although there is considerable unexplained variance. However, the abbreviated assessments that best predict different outcomes vary across outcomes. Future studies should determine whether responses to pharmacological and remediation treatments can be captured with brief assessments as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-471
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neuropsychological Tests
Schizophrenia
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Regression Analysis
Pharmacology
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Abbreviated assessments
  • Disability
  • Functional capacity
  • Neuropsychological assessment
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Abbreviated neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia : Prediction of different aspects of outcome. / Harvey, Philip D; Keefe, Richard S E; Patterson, Thomas L.; Heaton, Robert K.; Bowie, Christopher R.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.05.2009, p. 462-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvey, Philip D ; Keefe, Richard S E ; Patterson, Thomas L. ; Heaton, Robert K. ; Bowie, Christopher R. / Abbreviated neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia : Prediction of different aspects of outcome. In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2009 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 462-471.
@article{3ddcc211f510476ea8391c23394174f6,
title = "Abbreviated neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia: Prediction of different aspects of outcome",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to identify the best subset of neuropsychological tests for prediction of several different aspects of functioning in a large (n = 236) sample of older people with schizophrenia. While the validity of abbreviated assessment methods has been examined before, there has never been a comparative study of the prediction of different elements of cognitive impairment, real-world outcomes, and performance-based measures of functional capacity. Scores on 10 different tests from a neuropsychological assessment battery were used to predict global neuropsychological (NP) performance (indexed with averaged scores or calculated general deficit scores), performance-based indices of everyday-living skills and social competence, and case-manager ratings of real-world functioning. Forward entry stepwise regression analyses were used to identify the best predictors for each of the outcomes measures. Then, the analyses were adjusted for estimated premorbid IQ, which reduced the magnitude, but not the structure, of the correlations. Substantial amounts (over 70{\%}) of the variance in overall NP performance were accounted for by a limited number of NP tests. Considerable variance in measures of functional capacity was also accounted for by a limited number of tests. Different tests constituted the best predictor set for each outcome measure. A substantial proportion of the variance in several different NP and functional outcomes can be accounted for by a small number of NP tests that can be completed in a few minutes, although there is considerable unexplained variance. However, the abbreviated assessments that best predict different outcomes vary across outcomes. Future studies should determine whether responses to pharmacological and remediation treatments can be captured with brief assessments as well.",
keywords = "Abbreviated assessments, Disability, Functional capacity, Neuropsychological assessment, Schizophrenia",
author = "Harvey, {Philip D} and Keefe, {Richard S E} and Patterson, {Thomas L.} and Heaton, {Robert K.} and Bowie, {Christopher R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13803390802251386",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "462--471",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "1380-3395",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abbreviated neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia

T2 - Prediction of different aspects of outcome

AU - Harvey, Philip D

AU - Keefe, Richard S E

AU - Patterson, Thomas L.

AU - Heaton, Robert K.

AU - Bowie, Christopher R.

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to identify the best subset of neuropsychological tests for prediction of several different aspects of functioning in a large (n = 236) sample of older people with schizophrenia. While the validity of abbreviated assessment methods has been examined before, there has never been a comparative study of the prediction of different elements of cognitive impairment, real-world outcomes, and performance-based measures of functional capacity. Scores on 10 different tests from a neuropsychological assessment battery were used to predict global neuropsychological (NP) performance (indexed with averaged scores or calculated general deficit scores), performance-based indices of everyday-living skills and social competence, and case-manager ratings of real-world functioning. Forward entry stepwise regression analyses were used to identify the best predictors for each of the outcomes measures. Then, the analyses were adjusted for estimated premorbid IQ, which reduced the magnitude, but not the structure, of the correlations. Substantial amounts (over 70%) of the variance in overall NP performance were accounted for by a limited number of NP tests. Considerable variance in measures of functional capacity was also accounted for by a limited number of tests. Different tests constituted the best predictor set for each outcome measure. A substantial proportion of the variance in several different NP and functional outcomes can be accounted for by a small number of NP tests that can be completed in a few minutes, although there is considerable unexplained variance. However, the abbreviated assessments that best predict different outcomes vary across outcomes. Future studies should determine whether responses to pharmacological and remediation treatments can be captured with brief assessments as well.

AB - The aim of this study was to identify the best subset of neuropsychological tests for prediction of several different aspects of functioning in a large (n = 236) sample of older people with schizophrenia. While the validity of abbreviated assessment methods has been examined before, there has never been a comparative study of the prediction of different elements of cognitive impairment, real-world outcomes, and performance-based measures of functional capacity. Scores on 10 different tests from a neuropsychological assessment battery were used to predict global neuropsychological (NP) performance (indexed with averaged scores or calculated general deficit scores), performance-based indices of everyday-living skills and social competence, and case-manager ratings of real-world functioning. Forward entry stepwise regression analyses were used to identify the best predictors for each of the outcomes measures. Then, the analyses were adjusted for estimated premorbid IQ, which reduced the magnitude, but not the structure, of the correlations. Substantial amounts (over 70%) of the variance in overall NP performance were accounted for by a limited number of NP tests. Considerable variance in measures of functional capacity was also accounted for by a limited number of tests. Different tests constituted the best predictor set for each outcome measure. A substantial proportion of the variance in several different NP and functional outcomes can be accounted for by a small number of NP tests that can be completed in a few minutes, although there is considerable unexplained variance. However, the abbreviated assessments that best predict different outcomes vary across outcomes. Future studies should determine whether responses to pharmacological and remediation treatments can be captured with brief assessments as well.

KW - Abbreviated assessments

KW - Disability

KW - Functional capacity

KW - Neuropsychological assessment

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649910511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649910511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13803390802251386

DO - 10.1080/13803390802251386

M3 - Article

C2 - 18720182

AN - SCOPUS:67649910511

VL - 31

SP - 462

EP - 471

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 1380-3395

IS - 4

ER -