A simplified noninvasive method to measure airway blood flow in humans

Adam Wanner, Eliana Mendes, Neal D. Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our laboratory has previously developed and validated a noninvasive soluble gas uptake method to measure airway blood flow (Q̇aw) in humans (Onorato DJ, Demirozu MC, Breitenbücher A, Atkins ND, Chediak AD, and Wanner A. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149: 1132-1137, 1994; Scuri M, McCaskill V, Chediak AD, Abraham WM, and Wanner A. J Appl Physiol 79: 1386-1390, 1995). The method has the disadvantage of requiring eight breath-hold maneuvers for a single Qaw measurement, a complicated data analysis, and the inhalation of a potentially explosive gas mixture containing dimethylether (DME) and O2. Because of these shortcomings, the method thus far has not been used in other laboratories. We now simplified the method by having the subjects inhale 500 ml of a 10% DME-90% N2 gas mixture to fill the anatomical dead space, followed by a 5- or 15-s breath hold, and measuring the instantaneous DME and N2 concentrations and volume at the airway opening during the subsequent exhalation. From the difference in DME concentration in phase 1 of the expired N2 wash-in curve multiplied by the phase 1 dead space volume and divided by the mean DME concentration and the solubility coefficient for DME in tissue, Qaw can be calculated by using Fick's equation. We compared the new method to the validated old method in 10 healthy subjects and found mean ± SE Q̇aw values of 34.6 ± 2.3 and 34.6 ± 2.8 μl·min-1·ml-1, respectively (r = 0.93; upper and lower 95% confidence limit +2.48 and -2.47). Using the new method, the mean coefficient of variation for two consecutive measurements was 4.4% (range 0-10.4%); inhalation of 1.2 mg albuterol caused a 53 ± 14% increase in Q̇aw (P = 0.02) and inhalation of 2.4 mg methoxamine caused a 32 ± 7% decrease in Q̇aw (P = 0.07). We conclude that the new method provides reliable values of and detects the expected changes in Q̇aw with vasoactive drugs. The simplicity and improved safety of the method should improve its acceptability for the noninvasive assessment of Q̇aw in clinical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1674-1678
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume100
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Fingerprint

Inhalation
Gases
Exhalation
Methoxamine
Albuterol
Solubility
Healthy Volunteers
Safety
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Adrenergic agents
  • Bronchial blood flow
  • Soluble gases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

A simplified noninvasive method to measure airway blood flow in humans. / Wanner, Adam; Mendes, Eliana; Atkins, Neal D.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 100, No. 5, 01.05.2006, p. 1674-1678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb219e4a418b45d683f5354980cc66a3,
title = "A simplified noninvasive method to measure airway blood flow in humans",
abstract = "Our laboratory has previously developed and validated a noninvasive soluble gas uptake method to measure airway blood flow (Q̇aw) in humans (Onorato DJ, Demirozu MC, Breitenb{\"u}cher A, Atkins ND, Chediak AD, and Wanner A. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149: 1132-1137, 1994; Scuri M, McCaskill V, Chediak AD, Abraham WM, and Wanner A. J Appl Physiol 79: 1386-1390, 1995). The method has the disadvantage of requiring eight breath-hold maneuvers for a single Qaw measurement, a complicated data analysis, and the inhalation of a potentially explosive gas mixture containing dimethylether (DME) and O2. Because of these shortcomings, the method thus far has not been used in other laboratories. We now simplified the method by having the subjects inhale 500 ml of a 10{\%} DME-90{\%} N2 gas mixture to fill the anatomical dead space, followed by a 5- or 15-s breath hold, and measuring the instantaneous DME and N2 concentrations and volume at the airway opening during the subsequent exhalation. From the difference in DME concentration in phase 1 of the expired N2 wash-in curve multiplied by the phase 1 dead space volume and divided by the mean DME concentration and the solubility coefficient for DME in tissue, Qaw can be calculated by using Fick's equation. We compared the new method to the validated old method in 10 healthy subjects and found mean ± SE Q̇aw values of 34.6 ± 2.3 and 34.6 ± 2.8 μl·min-1·ml-1, respectively (r = 0.93; upper and lower 95{\%} confidence limit +2.48 and -2.47). Using the new method, the mean coefficient of variation for two consecutive measurements was 4.4{\%} (range 0-10.4{\%}); inhalation of 1.2 mg albuterol caused a 53 ± 14{\%} increase in Q̇aw (P = 0.02) and inhalation of 2.4 mg methoxamine caused a 32 ± 7{\%} decrease in Q̇aw (P = 0.07). We conclude that the new method provides reliable values of and detects the expected changes in Q̇aw with vasoactive drugs. The simplicity and improved safety of the method should improve its acceptability for the noninvasive assessment of Q̇aw in clinical research.",
keywords = "Adrenergic agents, Bronchial blood flow, Soluble gases",
author = "Adam Wanner and Eliana Mendes and Atkins, {Neal D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.01349.2005",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "1674--1678",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simplified noninvasive method to measure airway blood flow in humans

AU - Wanner, Adam

AU - Mendes, Eliana

AU - Atkins, Neal D.

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - Our laboratory has previously developed and validated a noninvasive soluble gas uptake method to measure airway blood flow (Q̇aw) in humans (Onorato DJ, Demirozu MC, Breitenbücher A, Atkins ND, Chediak AD, and Wanner A. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149: 1132-1137, 1994; Scuri M, McCaskill V, Chediak AD, Abraham WM, and Wanner A. J Appl Physiol 79: 1386-1390, 1995). The method has the disadvantage of requiring eight breath-hold maneuvers for a single Qaw measurement, a complicated data analysis, and the inhalation of a potentially explosive gas mixture containing dimethylether (DME) and O2. Because of these shortcomings, the method thus far has not been used in other laboratories. We now simplified the method by having the subjects inhale 500 ml of a 10% DME-90% N2 gas mixture to fill the anatomical dead space, followed by a 5- or 15-s breath hold, and measuring the instantaneous DME and N2 concentrations and volume at the airway opening during the subsequent exhalation. From the difference in DME concentration in phase 1 of the expired N2 wash-in curve multiplied by the phase 1 dead space volume and divided by the mean DME concentration and the solubility coefficient for DME in tissue, Qaw can be calculated by using Fick's equation. We compared the new method to the validated old method in 10 healthy subjects and found mean ± SE Q̇aw values of 34.6 ± 2.3 and 34.6 ± 2.8 μl·min-1·ml-1, respectively (r = 0.93; upper and lower 95% confidence limit +2.48 and -2.47). Using the new method, the mean coefficient of variation for two consecutive measurements was 4.4% (range 0-10.4%); inhalation of 1.2 mg albuterol caused a 53 ± 14% increase in Q̇aw (P = 0.02) and inhalation of 2.4 mg methoxamine caused a 32 ± 7% decrease in Q̇aw (P = 0.07). We conclude that the new method provides reliable values of and detects the expected changes in Q̇aw with vasoactive drugs. The simplicity and improved safety of the method should improve its acceptability for the noninvasive assessment of Q̇aw in clinical research.

AB - Our laboratory has previously developed and validated a noninvasive soluble gas uptake method to measure airway blood flow (Q̇aw) in humans (Onorato DJ, Demirozu MC, Breitenbücher A, Atkins ND, Chediak AD, and Wanner A. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149: 1132-1137, 1994; Scuri M, McCaskill V, Chediak AD, Abraham WM, and Wanner A. J Appl Physiol 79: 1386-1390, 1995). The method has the disadvantage of requiring eight breath-hold maneuvers for a single Qaw measurement, a complicated data analysis, and the inhalation of a potentially explosive gas mixture containing dimethylether (DME) and O2. Because of these shortcomings, the method thus far has not been used in other laboratories. We now simplified the method by having the subjects inhale 500 ml of a 10% DME-90% N2 gas mixture to fill the anatomical dead space, followed by a 5- or 15-s breath hold, and measuring the instantaneous DME and N2 concentrations and volume at the airway opening during the subsequent exhalation. From the difference in DME concentration in phase 1 of the expired N2 wash-in curve multiplied by the phase 1 dead space volume and divided by the mean DME concentration and the solubility coefficient for DME in tissue, Qaw can be calculated by using Fick's equation. We compared the new method to the validated old method in 10 healthy subjects and found mean ± SE Q̇aw values of 34.6 ± 2.3 and 34.6 ± 2.8 μl·min-1·ml-1, respectively (r = 0.93; upper and lower 95% confidence limit +2.48 and -2.47). Using the new method, the mean coefficient of variation for two consecutive measurements was 4.4% (range 0-10.4%); inhalation of 1.2 mg albuterol caused a 53 ± 14% increase in Q̇aw (P = 0.02) and inhalation of 2.4 mg methoxamine caused a 32 ± 7% decrease in Q̇aw (P = 0.07). We conclude that the new method provides reliable values of and detects the expected changes in Q̇aw with vasoactive drugs. The simplicity and improved safety of the method should improve its acceptability for the noninvasive assessment of Q̇aw in clinical research.

KW - Adrenergic agents

KW - Bronchial blood flow

KW - Soluble gases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646426095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646426095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01349.2005

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01349.2005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16614365

AN - SCOPUS:33646426095

VL - 100

SP - 1674

EP - 1678

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 5

ER -