A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine

Peter Le, Thomas Best, Safdar N. Khan, Ehud Mendel, William S. Marras

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coactivation is an important component for understanding the physiological cost of muscular and spinal loads and their associations with spinal pathology and potentially myofascial pain. However, due to the complex and dynamic nature of most activities of daily living, it can be difficult to capture a quantifiable measure of coactivation. Many methods exist to assess coactivation, but most are limited to two-muscle systems, isometric/complex analyses, or dynamic/uniplanar analyses. Hence, a void exists in that coactivation has not been documented or assessed as a multiple-muscle system under realistic complex dynamic loading. Overall, no coactivation index has been capable of assessing coactivation during complex dynamic exertions. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding of the factors that may influence coactivation, document the metrics used to assess coactivity, assess the feasibility of those metrics, and define the necessary variables for a coactivation index that can be used for a variety of tasks. It may also be clinically and practically relevant in the understanding of rehabilitation effectiveness, efficiency during task performance, human-task interactions, and possibly the etiology for a multitude of musculoskeletal conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-60
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume32
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Muscles
Task Performance and Analysis
Activities of Daily Living
Rehabilitation
Pathology
Efficiency
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Co-contraction
  • Lumbar spine
  • Muscle
  • Neck
  • Neuromuscular
  • Physiologic cost
  • Torso
  • Trunk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Biophysics
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine. / Le, Peter; Best, Thomas; Khan, Safdar N.; Mendel, Ehud; Marras, William S.

In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 32, 01.02.2017, p. 51-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Le, Peter ; Best, Thomas ; Khan, Safdar N. ; Mendel, Ehud ; Marras, William S. / A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine. In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2017 ; Vol. 32. pp. 51-60.
@article{301e046b94774980a83866793e0d8313,
title = "A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine",
abstract = "Coactivation is an important component for understanding the physiological cost of muscular and spinal loads and their associations with spinal pathology and potentially myofascial pain. However, due to the complex and dynamic nature of most activities of daily living, it can be difficult to capture a quantifiable measure of coactivation. Many methods exist to assess coactivation, but most are limited to two-muscle systems, isometric/complex analyses, or dynamic/uniplanar analyses. Hence, a void exists in that coactivation has not been documented or assessed as a multiple-muscle system under realistic complex dynamic loading. Overall, no coactivation index has been capable of assessing coactivation during complex dynamic exertions. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding of the factors that may influence coactivation, document the metrics used to assess coactivity, assess the feasibility of those metrics, and define the necessary variables for a coactivation index that can be used for a variety of tasks. It may also be clinically and practically relevant in the understanding of rehabilitation effectiveness, efficiency during task performance, human-task interactions, and possibly the etiology for a multitude of musculoskeletal conditions.",
keywords = "Cervical spine, Co-contraction, Lumbar spine, Muscle, Neck, Neuromuscular, Physiologic cost, Torso, Trunk",
author = "Peter Le and Thomas Best and Khan, {Safdar N.} and Ehud Mendel and Marras, {William S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "51--60",
journal = "Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology",
issn = "1050-6411",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine

AU - Le, Peter

AU - Best, Thomas

AU - Khan, Safdar N.

AU - Mendel, Ehud

AU - Marras, William S.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Coactivation is an important component for understanding the physiological cost of muscular and spinal loads and their associations with spinal pathology and potentially myofascial pain. However, due to the complex and dynamic nature of most activities of daily living, it can be difficult to capture a quantifiable measure of coactivation. Many methods exist to assess coactivation, but most are limited to two-muscle systems, isometric/complex analyses, or dynamic/uniplanar analyses. Hence, a void exists in that coactivation has not been documented or assessed as a multiple-muscle system under realistic complex dynamic loading. Overall, no coactivation index has been capable of assessing coactivation during complex dynamic exertions. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding of the factors that may influence coactivation, document the metrics used to assess coactivity, assess the feasibility of those metrics, and define the necessary variables for a coactivation index that can be used for a variety of tasks. It may also be clinically and practically relevant in the understanding of rehabilitation effectiveness, efficiency during task performance, human-task interactions, and possibly the etiology for a multitude of musculoskeletal conditions.

AB - Coactivation is an important component for understanding the physiological cost of muscular and spinal loads and their associations with spinal pathology and potentially myofascial pain. However, due to the complex and dynamic nature of most activities of daily living, it can be difficult to capture a quantifiable measure of coactivation. Many methods exist to assess coactivation, but most are limited to two-muscle systems, isometric/complex analyses, or dynamic/uniplanar analyses. Hence, a void exists in that coactivation has not been documented or assessed as a multiple-muscle system under realistic complex dynamic loading. Overall, no coactivation index has been capable of assessing coactivation during complex dynamic exertions. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding of the factors that may influence coactivation, document the metrics used to assess coactivity, assess the feasibility of those metrics, and define the necessary variables for a coactivation index that can be used for a variety of tasks. It may also be clinically and practically relevant in the understanding of rehabilitation effectiveness, efficiency during task performance, human-task interactions, and possibly the etiology for a multitude of musculoskeletal conditions.

KW - Cervical spine

KW - Co-contraction

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Muscle

KW - Neck

KW - Neuromuscular

KW - Physiologic cost

KW - Torso

KW - Trunk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007043808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007043808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.12.004

M3 - Review article

VL - 32

SP - 51

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

JF - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

SN - 1050-6411

ER -