A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry

Jason White, Martha Wells, Kristopher Arheart, Martin Donaldson, Marjorie A. Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of parents about oral sedation in pediatric dentistry. Methods: A 21-question questionnaire, administered to parents of children presenting for care in four pediatric dental practices, collected demographic information, media exposure to sedation, and parental knowledge/opinions regarding sedation procedures, such as NPO (nothing by mouth) guidelines, need for restraint, parental presence, and parental acceptance of treatment scenarios. Results: Among 256 questionnaires completed, 235 were usable. Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported using public insurance. Parents agreed/strongly agreed (75 percent) that protective stabilization should not be necessary during sedation, and 87 percent preferred to stay with their child during the appointment. No parents perceived sedation as unsafe. Seventy-three percent of parents were unaware of media coverage of sedation; 82 percent reported it was acceptable for their child to sleep through a sedation appointment, while only 18 percent found it acceptable for the child to be highly reactive. Conclusions: Parents prefer to remain with their child, believe that sedation is safe and restraint should not be necessary, and are more accepting of the child sleeping during treatment. Most parents are unaware of media coverage of dental sedation for children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-121
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric Dentistry
Volume38
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conscious Sedation
Pediatric Dentistry
Parents
Appointments and Schedules
Tooth
Child Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Insurance
Mouth
Sleep
Demography
Guidelines
Pediatrics
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Conscious Sedation
  • Parents
  • Pediatric Dentistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

White, J., Wells, M., Arheart, K., Donaldson, M., & Woods, M. A. (2016). A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry, 38(2), 116-121.

A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. / White, Jason; Wells, Martha; Arheart, Kristopher; Donaldson, Martin; Woods, Marjorie A.

In: Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 116-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, J, Wells, M, Arheart, K, Donaldson, M & Woods, MA 2016, 'A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry', Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 116-121.
White J, Wells M, Arheart K, Donaldson M, Woods MA. A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry. 2016 Mar 1;38(2):116-121.
White, Jason ; Wells, Martha ; Arheart, Kristopher ; Donaldson, Martin ; Woods, Marjorie A. / A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. In: Pediatric Dentistry. 2016 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 116-121.
@article{948b77a54f7745acb4746d847c0d717e,
title = "A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of parents about oral sedation in pediatric dentistry. Methods: A 21-question questionnaire, administered to parents of children presenting for care in four pediatric dental practices, collected demographic information, media exposure to sedation, and parental knowledge/opinions regarding sedation procedures, such as NPO (nothing by mouth) guidelines, need for restraint, parental presence, and parental acceptance of treatment scenarios. Results: Among 256 questionnaires completed, 235 were usable. Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported using public insurance. Parents agreed/strongly agreed (75 percent) that protective stabilization should not be necessary during sedation, and 87 percent preferred to stay with their child during the appointment. No parents perceived sedation as unsafe. Seventy-three percent of parents were unaware of media coverage of sedation; 82 percent reported it was acceptable for their child to sleep through a sedation appointment, while only 18 percent found it acceptable for the child to be highly reactive. Conclusions: Parents prefer to remain with their child, believe that sedation is safe and restraint should not be necessary, and are more accepting of the child sleeping during treatment. Most parents are unaware of media coverage of dental sedation for children.",
keywords = "Conscious Sedation, Parents, Pediatric Dentistry",
author = "Jason White and Martha Wells and Kristopher Arheart and Martin Donaldson and Woods, {Marjorie A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "116--121",
journal = "Pediatric Dentistry",
issn = "0164-1263",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry

AU - White, Jason

AU - Wells, Martha

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

AU - Donaldson, Martin

AU - Woods, Marjorie A.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of parents about oral sedation in pediatric dentistry. Methods: A 21-question questionnaire, administered to parents of children presenting for care in four pediatric dental practices, collected demographic information, media exposure to sedation, and parental knowledge/opinions regarding sedation procedures, such as NPO (nothing by mouth) guidelines, need for restraint, parental presence, and parental acceptance of treatment scenarios. Results: Among 256 questionnaires completed, 235 were usable. Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported using public insurance. Parents agreed/strongly agreed (75 percent) that protective stabilization should not be necessary during sedation, and 87 percent preferred to stay with their child during the appointment. No parents perceived sedation as unsafe. Seventy-three percent of parents were unaware of media coverage of sedation; 82 percent reported it was acceptable for their child to sleep through a sedation appointment, while only 18 percent found it acceptable for the child to be highly reactive. Conclusions: Parents prefer to remain with their child, believe that sedation is safe and restraint should not be necessary, and are more accepting of the child sleeping during treatment. Most parents are unaware of media coverage of dental sedation for children.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of parents about oral sedation in pediatric dentistry. Methods: A 21-question questionnaire, administered to parents of children presenting for care in four pediatric dental practices, collected demographic information, media exposure to sedation, and parental knowledge/opinions regarding sedation procedures, such as NPO (nothing by mouth) guidelines, need for restraint, parental presence, and parental acceptance of treatment scenarios. Results: Among 256 questionnaires completed, 235 were usable. Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported using public insurance. Parents agreed/strongly agreed (75 percent) that protective stabilization should not be necessary during sedation, and 87 percent preferred to stay with their child during the appointment. No parents perceived sedation as unsafe. Seventy-three percent of parents were unaware of media coverage of sedation; 82 percent reported it was acceptable for their child to sleep through a sedation appointment, while only 18 percent found it acceptable for the child to be highly reactive. Conclusions: Parents prefer to remain with their child, believe that sedation is safe and restraint should not be necessary, and are more accepting of the child sleeping during treatment. Most parents are unaware of media coverage of dental sedation for children.

KW - Conscious Sedation

KW - Parents

KW - Pediatric Dentistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025809683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025809683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 116

EP - 121

JO - Pediatric Dentistry

JF - Pediatric Dentistry

SN - 0164-1263

IS - 2

ER -