A quantitative description of tetanic and post tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction

Karl Magleby, J. E. Zengel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

End plate potentials were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca, to study post tetanic potentiation (potentiation). The magnitude of potentiation was not directly related to the number of conditioning impulses, but was a function of the frequency and duration of the conditioning stimulation. Potentiation was always greater following an equal number of impulses delivered at higher frequency of stimulation. Plots of the magnitude of potentiation against the number of conditioning impulses would sometimes show an upward inflexion depending on the parameters of stimulation. These experimental observations were described by a model based on the assumptions that potentiation is linearly related to a residual substance, R(t), which accumulates in the nerve terminal during repetitive stimulation, and that each nerve impulse adds an identical increment, r, of this residual substance. The data were not described by assuming a 4th power relationship between potential and R(t). The upward inflexion in potentiation is described by the model as resulting from an increase in the time constant for the decay of potentiation, as the magnitude of potentiation increases. The increment of residual substance r added by each impulse was independent of the amount of transmitter released during the conditioning train. This increment typically increased transmitter release by about 1% of the control level in the absence of potentiation. Suggestions are given to explain why potentiation of transmitter release, which is thought to arise from an accumulation of Ca2+ in the nerve terminal, can be described assuming a linear relationship between potentiation and R(t), the proposed substance responsible for potentiation under experimental conditions in which a 3rd to 4th power relationship would be expected to exist between external Ca concentration and evoked transmitter release.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-208
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Physiology
Volume245
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 1975
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neuromuscular Junction
Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials
Anura
Action Potentials
Electrodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

A quantitative description of tetanic and post tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. / Magleby, Karl; Zengel, J. E.

In: Journal of Physiology, Vol. 245, No. 1, 01.12.1975, p. 183-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b33579f6f7c844ecafc4d0f5b09faf38,
title = "A quantitative description of tetanic and post tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction",
abstract = "End plate potentials were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca, to study post tetanic potentiation (potentiation). The magnitude of potentiation was not directly related to the number of conditioning impulses, but was a function of the frequency and duration of the conditioning stimulation. Potentiation was always greater following an equal number of impulses delivered at higher frequency of stimulation. Plots of the magnitude of potentiation against the number of conditioning impulses would sometimes show an upward inflexion depending on the parameters of stimulation. These experimental observations were described by a model based on the assumptions that potentiation is linearly related to a residual substance, R(t), which accumulates in the nerve terminal during repetitive stimulation, and that each nerve impulse adds an identical increment, r, of this residual substance. The data were not described by assuming a 4th power relationship between potential and R(t). The upward inflexion in potentiation is described by the model as resulting from an increase in the time constant for the decay of potentiation, as the magnitude of potentiation increases. The increment of residual substance r added by each impulse was independent of the amount of transmitter released during the conditioning train. This increment typically increased transmitter release by about 1{\%} of the control level in the absence of potentiation. Suggestions are given to explain why potentiation of transmitter release, which is thought to arise from an accumulation of Ca2+ in the nerve terminal, can be described assuming a linear relationship between potentiation and R(t), the proposed substance responsible for potentiation under experimental conditions in which a 3rd to 4th power relationship would be expected to exist between external Ca concentration and evoked transmitter release.",
author = "Karl Magleby and Zengel, {J. E.}",
year = "1975",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "245",
pages = "183--208",
journal = "Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0022-3751",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative description of tetanic and post tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction

AU - Magleby, Karl

AU - Zengel, J. E.

PY - 1975/12/1

Y1 - 1975/12/1

N2 - End plate potentials were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca, to study post tetanic potentiation (potentiation). The magnitude of potentiation was not directly related to the number of conditioning impulses, but was a function of the frequency and duration of the conditioning stimulation. Potentiation was always greater following an equal number of impulses delivered at higher frequency of stimulation. Plots of the magnitude of potentiation against the number of conditioning impulses would sometimes show an upward inflexion depending on the parameters of stimulation. These experimental observations were described by a model based on the assumptions that potentiation is linearly related to a residual substance, R(t), which accumulates in the nerve terminal during repetitive stimulation, and that each nerve impulse adds an identical increment, r, of this residual substance. The data were not described by assuming a 4th power relationship between potential and R(t). The upward inflexion in potentiation is described by the model as resulting from an increase in the time constant for the decay of potentiation, as the magnitude of potentiation increases. The increment of residual substance r added by each impulse was independent of the amount of transmitter released during the conditioning train. This increment typically increased transmitter release by about 1% of the control level in the absence of potentiation. Suggestions are given to explain why potentiation of transmitter release, which is thought to arise from an accumulation of Ca2+ in the nerve terminal, can be described assuming a linear relationship between potentiation and R(t), the proposed substance responsible for potentiation under experimental conditions in which a 3rd to 4th power relationship would be expected to exist between external Ca concentration and evoked transmitter release.

AB - End plate potentials were recorded with a surface electrode from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and low Ca, to study post tetanic potentiation (potentiation). The magnitude of potentiation was not directly related to the number of conditioning impulses, but was a function of the frequency and duration of the conditioning stimulation. Potentiation was always greater following an equal number of impulses delivered at higher frequency of stimulation. Plots of the magnitude of potentiation against the number of conditioning impulses would sometimes show an upward inflexion depending on the parameters of stimulation. These experimental observations were described by a model based on the assumptions that potentiation is linearly related to a residual substance, R(t), which accumulates in the nerve terminal during repetitive stimulation, and that each nerve impulse adds an identical increment, r, of this residual substance. The data were not described by assuming a 4th power relationship between potential and R(t). The upward inflexion in potentiation is described by the model as resulting from an increase in the time constant for the decay of potentiation, as the magnitude of potentiation increases. The increment of residual substance r added by each impulse was independent of the amount of transmitter released during the conditioning train. This increment typically increased transmitter release by about 1% of the control level in the absence of potentiation. Suggestions are given to explain why potentiation of transmitter release, which is thought to arise from an accumulation of Ca2+ in the nerve terminal, can be described assuming a linear relationship between potentiation and R(t), the proposed substance responsible for potentiation under experimental conditions in which a 3rd to 4th power relationship would be expected to exist between external Ca concentration and evoked transmitter release.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016659763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016659763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 165286

AN - SCOPUS:0016659763

VL - 245

SP - 183

EP - 208

JO - Journal of Physiology

JF - Journal of Physiology

SN - 0022-3751

IS - 1

ER -