A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire

Maria Voss, Thomas Ehring, Kiara R. Timpano, Jutta Joormann, Larissa Wolkenstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the importance of negative and positive emotion for our understanding of affective disorders, research on emotion regulation has mainly focused on the regulation of negative emotion. To capture individual differences in positive emotion regulation, Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008) developed the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire (RPA), a self-report measure of different cognitive responses to positive emotions, including self-focused rumination, emotion-focused rumination, and dampening thoughts. The main purpose of this study was to develop a German version of this questionnaire and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Participants from two independent samples (N = 403; N = 486) completed a set of questionnaires. An exploratory factor analysis within the first sample did not replicate the 3-factor model of the original English version by Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008), but rather suggested a 2-factor solution with rumination and dampening reflecting the main factors. A confirmatory factor analysis within the second sample confirmed this 2-factor solution. Although model fit was generally low, both subscales showed adequate internal consistency and acceptable convergent and incremental validity with measures of self-esteem, rumination, depressive symptoms, mania symptoms, and mania vulnerability. Our results support the German RPA as a helpful measure of positive emotion regulation in research on and therapy of affective disorders. The factor structure of the RPA should be further evaluated in future studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-435
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2019

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Emotions
Cognitive Therapy
Mood Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Research
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Self Concept
Individuality
Self Report
Depression

Keywords

  • Dampening
  • Depression
  • Emotion regulation
  • Mania
  • Positive affect
  • Rumination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire. / Voss, Maria; Ehring, Thomas; Timpano, Kiara R.; Joormann, Jutta; Wolkenstein, Larissa.

In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 41, No. 3, 15.09.2019, p. 425-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Voss, Maria ; Ehring, Thomas ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Joormann, Jutta ; Wolkenstein, Larissa. / A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire. In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 425-435.
@article{644af780a19e4572856fbe2a24926199,
title = "A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire",
abstract = "Despite the importance of negative and positive emotion for our understanding of affective disorders, research on emotion regulation has mainly focused on the regulation of negative emotion. To capture individual differences in positive emotion regulation, Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008) developed the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire (RPA), a self-report measure of different cognitive responses to positive emotions, including self-focused rumination, emotion-focused rumination, and dampening thoughts. The main purpose of this study was to develop a German version of this questionnaire and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Participants from two independent samples (N = 403; N = 486) completed a set of questionnaires. An exploratory factor analysis within the first sample did not replicate the 3-factor model of the original English version by Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008), but rather suggested a 2-factor solution with rumination and dampening reflecting the main factors. A confirmatory factor analysis within the second sample confirmed this 2-factor solution. Although model fit was generally low, both subscales showed adequate internal consistency and acceptable convergent and incremental validity with measures of self-esteem, rumination, depressive symptoms, mania symptoms, and mania vulnerability. Our results support the German RPA as a helpful measure of positive emotion regulation in research on and therapy of affective disorders. The factor structure of the RPA should be further evaluated in future studies.",
keywords = "Dampening, Depression, Emotion regulation, Mania, Positive affect, Rumination",
author = "Maria Voss and Thomas Ehring and Timpano, {Kiara R.} and Jutta Joormann and Larissa Wolkenstein",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10862-019-09757-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "425--435",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire

AU - Voss, Maria

AU - Ehring, Thomas

AU - Timpano, Kiara R.

AU - Joormann, Jutta

AU - Wolkenstein, Larissa

PY - 2019/9/15

Y1 - 2019/9/15

N2 - Despite the importance of negative and positive emotion for our understanding of affective disorders, research on emotion regulation has mainly focused on the regulation of negative emotion. To capture individual differences in positive emotion regulation, Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008) developed the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire (RPA), a self-report measure of different cognitive responses to positive emotions, including self-focused rumination, emotion-focused rumination, and dampening thoughts. The main purpose of this study was to develop a German version of this questionnaire and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Participants from two independent samples (N = 403; N = 486) completed a set of questionnaires. An exploratory factor analysis within the first sample did not replicate the 3-factor model of the original English version by Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008), but rather suggested a 2-factor solution with rumination and dampening reflecting the main factors. A confirmatory factor analysis within the second sample confirmed this 2-factor solution. Although model fit was generally low, both subscales showed adequate internal consistency and acceptable convergent and incremental validity with measures of self-esteem, rumination, depressive symptoms, mania symptoms, and mania vulnerability. Our results support the German RPA as a helpful measure of positive emotion regulation in research on and therapy of affective disorders. The factor structure of the RPA should be further evaluated in future studies.

AB - Despite the importance of negative and positive emotion for our understanding of affective disorders, research on emotion regulation has mainly focused on the regulation of negative emotion. To capture individual differences in positive emotion regulation, Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008) developed the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire (RPA), a self-report measure of different cognitive responses to positive emotions, including self-focused rumination, emotion-focused rumination, and dampening thoughts. The main purpose of this study was to develop a German version of this questionnaire and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Participants from two independent samples (N = 403; N = 486) completed a set of questionnaires. An exploratory factor analysis within the first sample did not replicate the 3-factor model of the original English version by Feldman et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4): 507–525, 2008), but rather suggested a 2-factor solution with rumination and dampening reflecting the main factors. A confirmatory factor analysis within the second sample confirmed this 2-factor solution. Although model fit was generally low, both subscales showed adequate internal consistency and acceptable convergent and incremental validity with measures of self-esteem, rumination, depressive symptoms, mania symptoms, and mania vulnerability. Our results support the German RPA as a helpful measure of positive emotion regulation in research on and therapy of affective disorders. The factor structure of the RPA should be further evaluated in future studies.

KW - Dampening

KW - Depression

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Mania

KW - Positive affect

KW - Rumination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070059325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070059325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10862-019-09757-8

DO - 10.1007/s10862-019-09757-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070059325

VL - 41

SP - 425

EP - 435

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

IS - 3

ER -