A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures

Travis C. Evans, Katherine A. Walukevich, Ilana Seager, Jennifer C Britton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control each purportedly play a key role in anxiety disorders. Divergent psychometric properties among attention measures may produce differential detection of anxiety-related associations and treatment-related changes. However, no studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of these attention measures in the same sample. Design: Eighty-five young adults (M = 19.41 years, SD = 1.47, 48 Females) completed a cognitive task battery and a subset of 60 participants (M = 19.42 years, SD = 1.48, 33 Females) completed the task battery again approximately two weeks later. Method: To assess preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control, the cognitive task battery included a dot-probe task, emotion and gender Stroop tasks, and a flanker task. Tasks varied in how attention was directed and if emotional stimuli were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across measures. Results: Within the same sample, internal consistency and reliability differed across attention measures. Explicit attention measures (emotional Stroop and flanker) exhibited stronger internal consistency and greater test-retest reliability compared to implicit measures (dot-probe and gender Stroop). Conclusions: These results inform clinical research using attention measures to assess anxiety-related differences and treatment response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalAnxiety, Stress and Coping
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 6 2018

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Anxiety
Reproducibility of Results
Anxiety Disorders
Battery
Stroop
Emotion
Young Adult
Emotions
Threat
Emotional Response
Test-retest Reliability
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • attention
  • cognitive tasks
  • information processing
  • Psychometric properties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures. / Evans, Travis C.; Walukevich, Katherine A.; Seager, Ilana; Britton, Jennifer C.

In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 06.07.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, Travis C. ; Walukevich, Katherine A. ; Seager, Ilana ; Britton, Jennifer C. / A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures. In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping. 2018 ; pp. 1-16.
@article{f26543a90448484a9c9a069c1b5e5e61,
title = "A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control each purportedly play a key role in anxiety disorders. Divergent psychometric properties among attention measures may produce differential detection of anxiety-related associations and treatment-related changes. However, no studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of these attention measures in the same sample. Design: Eighty-five young adults (M = 19.41 years, SD = 1.47, 48 Females) completed a cognitive task battery and a subset of 60 participants (M = 19.42 years, SD = 1.48, 33 Females) completed the task battery again approximately two weeks later. Method: To assess preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control, the cognitive task battery included a dot-probe task, emotion and gender Stroop tasks, and a flanker task. Tasks varied in how attention was directed and if emotional stimuli were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across measures. Results: Within the same sample, internal consistency and reliability differed across attention measures. Explicit attention measures (emotional Stroop and flanker) exhibited stronger internal consistency and greater test-retest reliability compared to implicit measures (dot-probe and gender Stroop). Conclusions: These results inform clinical research using attention measures to assess anxiety-related differences and treatment response.",
keywords = "anxiety, attention, cognitive tasks, information processing, Psychometric properties",
author = "Evans, {Travis C.} and Walukevich, {Katherine A.} and Ilana Seager and Britton, {Jennifer C}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/10615806.2018.1489536",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Anxiety, Stress and Coping",
issn = "1061-5806",
publisher = "Brunner - Routledge (US)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures

AU - Evans, Travis C.

AU - Walukevich, Katherine A.

AU - Seager, Ilana

AU - Britton, Jennifer C

PY - 2018/7/6

Y1 - 2018/7/6

N2 - Background and Objectives: Preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control each purportedly play a key role in anxiety disorders. Divergent psychometric properties among attention measures may produce differential detection of anxiety-related associations and treatment-related changes. However, no studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of these attention measures in the same sample. Design: Eighty-five young adults (M = 19.41 years, SD = 1.47, 48 Females) completed a cognitive task battery and a subset of 60 participants (M = 19.42 years, SD = 1.48, 33 Females) completed the task battery again approximately two weeks later. Method: To assess preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control, the cognitive task battery included a dot-probe task, emotion and gender Stroop tasks, and a flanker task. Tasks varied in how attention was directed and if emotional stimuli were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across measures. Results: Within the same sample, internal consistency and reliability differed across attention measures. Explicit attention measures (emotional Stroop and flanker) exhibited stronger internal consistency and greater test-retest reliability compared to implicit measures (dot-probe and gender Stroop). Conclusions: These results inform clinical research using attention measures to assess anxiety-related differences and treatment response.

AB - Background and Objectives: Preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control each purportedly play a key role in anxiety disorders. Divergent psychometric properties among attention measures may produce differential detection of anxiety-related associations and treatment-related changes. However, no studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of these attention measures in the same sample. Design: Eighty-five young adults (M = 19.41 years, SD = 1.47, 48 Females) completed a cognitive task battery and a subset of 60 participants (M = 19.42 years, SD = 1.48, 33 Females) completed the task battery again approximately two weeks later. Method: To assess preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control, the cognitive task battery included a dot-probe task, emotion and gender Stroop tasks, and a flanker task. Tasks varied in how attention was directed and if emotional stimuli were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across measures. Results: Within the same sample, internal consistency and reliability differed across attention measures. Explicit attention measures (emotional Stroop and flanker) exhibited stronger internal consistency and greater test-retest reliability compared to implicit measures (dot-probe and gender Stroop). Conclusions: These results inform clinical research using attention measures to assess anxiety-related differences and treatment response.

KW - anxiety

KW - attention

KW - cognitive tasks

KW - information processing

KW - Psychometric properties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049627017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049627017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10615806.2018.1489536

DO - 10.1080/10615806.2018.1489536

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

JF - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

SN - 1061-5806

ER -