A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Marc Savoie, Sandy S. Kim, Mark S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

128 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Some patients report that the penis is smaller after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We performed a prospective study which measured penile length before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 men consented to penile measurements before radical prostatectomy performed by the same surgeon. Repeat measurements were performed at 3-month intervals following surgery. Penile measurements (cm.) consisted of flaccid length, stretched length, depth of prepubic fat pad and circumference. Statistical analysis of penile measurements was performed using the paired samples and independent Student's t test, Pearson's correlation and analysis of variance. Results: Mean patient age was 59.1 (range 42 to 76). No patient had a penile abnormality, for example Peyronie's disease, or history of penile or urethral surgery. The size of the penis was significantly smaller after prostatectomy, and there was a significant difference for flaccid (p <0.001), stretched (p <0.001), prepubic fat pad (p = 0.02) and circumference measurements (p <0.01). Twelve patients (19%) had a 15% or greater decrease in stretched penile length. When dichotomizing groups at the cut point of 15% decrease, the independent t test of prostate size was not significant (t[df 36.7] = -1.83, p = 0.076). Nerve sparing was not significant in relation to change in penile stretched length, (F[df 2, 62] = 0.501, p = 0.609). Conclusions: Our findings support observations of decreased penile length after radical prostatectomy. Men should be counseled before radical prostatectomy that penile shortening may occur.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1462-1464
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume169
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prospective Studies
Penis
Adipose Tissue
Penile Induration
Prostate
Analysis of Variance
Students

Keywords

  • Body weights and measures
  • Penis
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. / Savoie, Marc; Kim, Sandy S.; Soloway, Mark S.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 169, No. 4, 01.04.2003, p. 1462-1464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savoie, Marc ; Kim, Sandy S. ; Soloway, Mark S. / A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In: Journal of Urology. 2003 ; Vol. 169, No. 4. pp. 1462-1464.
@article{fc3bfa872f774418851d522dae0e09a0,
title = "A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: Some patients report that the penis is smaller after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We performed a prospective study which measured penile length before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 men consented to penile measurements before radical prostatectomy performed by the same surgeon. Repeat measurements were performed at 3-month intervals following surgery. Penile measurements (cm.) consisted of flaccid length, stretched length, depth of prepubic fat pad and circumference. Statistical analysis of penile measurements was performed using the paired samples and independent Student's t test, Pearson's correlation and analysis of variance. Results: Mean patient age was 59.1 (range 42 to 76). No patient had a penile abnormality, for example Peyronie's disease, or history of penile or urethral surgery. The size of the penis was significantly smaller after prostatectomy, and there was a significant difference for flaccid (p <0.001), stretched (p <0.001), prepubic fat pad (p = 0.02) and circumference measurements (p <0.01). Twelve patients (19{\%}) had a 15{\%} or greater decrease in stretched penile length. When dichotomizing groups at the cut point of 15{\%} decrease, the independent t test of prostate size was not significant (t[df 36.7] = -1.83, p = 0.076). Nerve sparing was not significant in relation to change in penile stretched length, (F[df 2, 62] = 0.501, p = 0.609). Conclusions: Our findings support observations of decreased penile length after radical prostatectomy. Men should be counseled before radical prostatectomy that penile shortening may occur.",
keywords = "Body weights and measures, Penis, Prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms",
author = "Marc Savoie and Kim, {Sandy S.} and Soloway, {Mark S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000053720.93303.33",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "1462--1464",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

AU - Savoie, Marc

AU - Kim, Sandy S.

AU - Soloway, Mark S.

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Some patients report that the penis is smaller after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We performed a prospective study which measured penile length before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 men consented to penile measurements before radical prostatectomy performed by the same surgeon. Repeat measurements were performed at 3-month intervals following surgery. Penile measurements (cm.) consisted of flaccid length, stretched length, depth of prepubic fat pad and circumference. Statistical analysis of penile measurements was performed using the paired samples and independent Student's t test, Pearson's correlation and analysis of variance. Results: Mean patient age was 59.1 (range 42 to 76). No patient had a penile abnormality, for example Peyronie's disease, or history of penile or urethral surgery. The size of the penis was significantly smaller after prostatectomy, and there was a significant difference for flaccid (p <0.001), stretched (p <0.001), prepubic fat pad (p = 0.02) and circumference measurements (p <0.01). Twelve patients (19%) had a 15% or greater decrease in stretched penile length. When dichotomizing groups at the cut point of 15% decrease, the independent t test of prostate size was not significant (t[df 36.7] = -1.83, p = 0.076). Nerve sparing was not significant in relation to change in penile stretched length, (F[df 2, 62] = 0.501, p = 0.609). Conclusions: Our findings support observations of decreased penile length after radical prostatectomy. Men should be counseled before radical prostatectomy that penile shortening may occur.

AB - Purpose: Some patients report that the penis is smaller after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We performed a prospective study which measured penile length before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 men consented to penile measurements before radical prostatectomy performed by the same surgeon. Repeat measurements were performed at 3-month intervals following surgery. Penile measurements (cm.) consisted of flaccid length, stretched length, depth of prepubic fat pad and circumference. Statistical analysis of penile measurements was performed using the paired samples and independent Student's t test, Pearson's correlation and analysis of variance. Results: Mean patient age was 59.1 (range 42 to 76). No patient had a penile abnormality, for example Peyronie's disease, or history of penile or urethral surgery. The size of the penis was significantly smaller after prostatectomy, and there was a significant difference for flaccid (p <0.001), stretched (p <0.001), prepubic fat pad (p = 0.02) and circumference measurements (p <0.01). Twelve patients (19%) had a 15% or greater decrease in stretched penile length. When dichotomizing groups at the cut point of 15% decrease, the independent t test of prostate size was not significant (t[df 36.7] = -1.83, p = 0.076). Nerve sparing was not significant in relation to change in penile stretched length, (F[df 2, 62] = 0.501, p = 0.609). Conclusions: Our findings support observations of decreased penile length after radical prostatectomy. Men should be counseled before radical prostatectomy that penile shortening may occur.

KW - Body weights and measures

KW - Penis

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037377020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037377020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000053720.93303.33

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000053720.93303.33

M3 - Article

C2 - 12629384

AN - SCOPUS:0037377020

VL - 169

SP - 1462

EP - 1464

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -