A prospective evaluation comparing CT localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

Steve J. Feigenberg, Kamen Paskalev, Shawn McNeeley, Eric M. Horwitz, Andre Konski, Lu Wang, Charlie Ma, Alan Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-110
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume8
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy
Tomography
radiation therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms
tomography
Ultrasonics
cancer
evaluation
shift
rooms
Therapeutics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
correlation coefficients
positioning
therapy
alignment
Direction compound

Keywords

  • CT localization
  • Image-guided radiotherapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Ultrasound localization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

A prospective evaluation comparing CT localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. / Feigenberg, Steve J.; Paskalev, Kamen; McNeeley, Shawn; Horwitz, Eric M.; Konski, Andre; Wang, Lu; Ma, Charlie; Pollack, Alan.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.06.2007, p. 99-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feigenberg, Steve J. ; Paskalev, Kamen ; McNeeley, Shawn ; Horwitz, Eric M. ; Konski, Andre ; Wang, Lu ; Ma, Charlie ; Pollack, Alan. / A prospective evaluation comparing CT localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2007 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 99-110.
@article{557183dc6781421586fe9e2c9b5bd9db,
title = "A prospective evaluation comparing CT localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer",
abstract = "In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.",
keywords = "CT localization, Image-guided radiotherapy, Prostate cancer, Ultrasound localization",
author = "Feigenberg, {Steve J.} and Kamen Paskalev and Shawn McNeeley and Horwitz, {Eric M.} and Andre Konski and Lu Wang and Charlie Ma and Alan Pollack",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "99--110",
journal = "Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective evaluation comparing CT localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

AU - Feigenberg, Steve J.

AU - Paskalev, Kamen

AU - McNeeley, Shawn

AU - Horwitz, Eric M.

AU - Konski, Andre

AU - Wang, Lu

AU - Ma, Charlie

AU - Pollack, Alan

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.

AB - In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.

KW - CT localization

KW - Image-guided radiotherapy

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Ultrasound localization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548219962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548219962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 99

EP - 110

JO - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 3

ER -