A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology

Shane S. Bush, Christopher L. Grote, Doug E. Johnson-Greene, Michele Macartney-Filgate

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Neuropsychologists who have considerable experience reflecting, presenting, publishing, and advising on ethical matters are a rich resource for clinicians who have ethics questions. Consultation with such colleagues can be an important part of the ethical decision-making process. The purpose of the present article is to provide the opinions and perspectives of three neuropsychologists who, based on their experience and scholarly activities, served as panelists regarding ethical matters. Although the advice and opinions of colleagues are not a substitute for familiarity with relevant ethical requirements, guidelines, and professional literature, they offer valuable information that enhances the ethical decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-344
Number of pages24
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes


  • Competence
  • Ethics
  • Interview
  • Neuropsychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this